|
||||||||
Why is Anita always undermarked ??!!?? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
|
Why is Anita always undermarked ??!!??
Seriously why
???Undermarked in comparison to the other contestants. Since day 1 !!!!!! She has so much natural talent. ..no dancing experience to my knowledge and YET the judges are so tough with her. It's a shame that she hasn't even scored a 30 yet
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7,319
|
She has not been under Marked!
PS FYI there are a lot of under marked and overmarked threads running already. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,352
|
Its the thing that annoying me the most this year Anita is great and a natural dancer. She has been undermarked every week I know a lot of people will disagree with me but for me Anita is the best female dancer this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,403
|
I thought she was undermarked last night. Going first didn't help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,833
|
Quote:
Seriously why
???Undermarked in comparison to the other contestants. Since day 1 !!!!!! She has so much natural talent. ..no dancing experience to my knowledge and YET the judges are so tough with her. It's a shame that she hasn't even scored a 30 yet ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,283
|
Is she? Only really liked her Charleston and I have a feeling that Gleb is one of the reasons why she is so popular (between the Gleb special and ripping his shirt off, he is making Artem look like an amateur
).People rave about her latin dances, but I just can't see it. Her CCC was very decent, but people claiming that her Samba was great yesterday And there is nothing wrong with my sight. But perhaps you should be glad, as her perceived undermarking will only gain her more votes (in the end the audience votes trump the judges votes). Look at it this way, Craig scored her only 1 point lower then Jay in the first 4 weeks (and she beat him twice!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,283
|
Quote:
Its the thing that annoying me the most this year Anita is great and a natural dancer. She has been undermarked every week I know a lot of people will disagree with me but for me Anita is the best female dancer this year.
![]() People might like her best, for whatever reasons, but that doesn't make her the best dancer. *starts a campaign for Carol* |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,761
|
Quote:
I thought she was undermarked last night. Going first didn't help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Scotland .
Posts: 5,660
|
I think her marking was about right .
I love Anita's work , she's fabulous and I would be more than happy to see her win the show , BUT she seems to have stalled . She started so fantastically well and I was mesmerised by her , but last night was a bit ordinary . The routine was slightly less good than her past performances so yes , I think her scoring was reasonable . |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond, Surrey.
Posts: 13,814
|
I agree to a certain extent. I would have put her about level with Kellie and Peter, but Katie, Georgia and Helen were all better. It's all a matter of opinion of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,187
|
Quote:
Seriously why
???Undermarked in comparison to the other contestants. Since day 1 !!!!!! She has so much natural talent. ..no dancing experience to my knowledge and YET the judges are so tough with her. It's a shame that she hasn't even scored a 30 yet ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,520
|
I felt the marking was about right this week. She looked fine from the hips up. I felt that she did not have a very good leg and foot action.
Loved her charleston though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 120
|
I don't dislike Anita, but I don't get the hype over her either last night she was average.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
Sambas have always been quite tough to get right for the women compared to salsas. Caroline Flack, for example, had a similar looking samba last year that also left the judges a bit cold. It didn't do her any harm in the long run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,372
|
I think Anita and Gleb look the part but they aren't quite dancing it yet - hopefully they will soon
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,259
|
Quote:
Sambas have always been quite tough to get right for the women compared to salsas. Caroline Flack, for example, had a similar looking samba last year that also left the judges a bit cold. It didn't do her any harm in the long run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 28,896
|
Ryan McShane, a pro-dancer, tweeted that he thought Anita & Gleb had been undermarked.
I thought the judge's comments and scores were fair and pretty good for someone who's new to dance and attempted a Samba on Week 4 - and did a pretty good job of it. Not convinced any of Helen, Kellie, Peter, Jamelia were a full 5 points better than Anita though. I'd say it was more a case of them being overmarked by comparison. I suspect there was some over-hyping of Peter and protecting of Jamelia going on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,584
|
The judges have been instructed to mark a certain way by the production team. Their the reason why Peter is over scored, all they give a shit over is ratings and having more headlines in the media to encourage publicity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,443
|
Quote:
I agree to a certain extent. I would have put her about level with Kellie and Peter, but Katie, Georgia and Helen were all better. It's all a matter of opinion of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Scotland .
Posts: 5,660
|
Quote:
Sambas have always been quite tough to get right for the women compared to salsas. Caroline Flack, for example, had a similar looking samba last year that also left the judges a bit cold. It didn't do her any harm in the long run.
I really should do some youtubeing to hone my judgement . Anita's dance just looked off and lacked her usual oomph to me, and for that reason I thought her score about right this week .Hopefully next week she gets back to smashing it . |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
|
Quote:
Its the thing that annoying me the most this year Anita is great and a natural dancer. She has been undermarked every week I know a lot of people will disagree with me but for me Anita is the best female dancer this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Twitterverse
Posts: 39,530
|
Yes I agree and think she is being consistently undermarked. I know she has got a few issues that are in need of improvement but I always feel the judges are quite picky in their comments.
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 269
|
Quote:
Ryan McShane, a pro-dancer, tweeted that he thought Anita & Gleb had been undermarked.
I thought the judge's comments and scores were fair and pretty good for someone who's new to dance and attempted a Samba on Week 4 - and did a pretty good job of it. Not convinced any of Helen, Kellie, Peter, Jamelia were a full 5 points better than Anita though. I'd say it was more a case of them being overmarked by comparison. I suspect there was some over-hyping of Peter and protecting of Jamelia going on. Anita dances a sinuous Samba complete with quick basic, voltas, travelling voltas, bota fogos. Her hip action comes from her feet and the all-important back-of-knee flex so she looks natural and not jerky. The placement of her arms is just right. She gets 27. Helen does a stiffer version of the Skorjanec salsa. She gets 32????
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,584
|
Quote:
Agreed, to a point. I'm not convinced that Strictly judges score each dance on its own. Unless they're present during final or dress rehearsals to get an advance look then it is all comparative marking which makes me think that maybe there's truth to what they're saying that their scores are influenced by program producers. I mean, really;
Anita dances a sinuous Samba complete with quick basic, voltas, travelling voltas, bota fogos. Her hip action comes from her feet and the all-important back-of-knee flex so she looks natural and not jerky. The placement of her arms is just right. She gets 27. Helen does a stiffer version of the Skorjanec salsa. She gets 32???? ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,714
|
I did think she was marginally under marked this week with a difficult dance but then first out is the pace-maker and often suffers. I didn't think she deserved more last week with that strange 'show-dance' kerfuffle masquerading as a Smooth. But in any event, I'm not sure under marking at this stage is a problem when they are in no danger of a dance-off - it allows the illusion of the all important 'journey' as the judges add on marks ager on. Rachel Stevens was a good e.g. of this - in truth she didn't get noticeably better as the series progressed (she was consistently good) but the judges started marking her higher towards the end when she needed it to get to the final.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:08.


???

).
And there is nothing wrong with my sight.
