|
||||||||
Is Ola's sexy calendar inappropriate? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#151 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
|
I think there's no love lost between Craig and Jordan(s), but I don't think he completely made it up darling.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#152 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
It sure is, I wonder why.
Gleb Savchenko ripped off his shirt and that was on the "family orientated" show itself.Somehow I doubt the ladies who object to a beautiful lady posing for sexy shots immediately called OFCOM to complain about the buff gent with his top off on Strictly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
|
Quote:
Completely agree. I'm amazed that some people have actually said Ola's calendar is 'tasteful'
- its sleazy and she and James both know it...Sleazy has connotations of being unhand or without consent. If an attractive woman chooses to pose in a sexy way then there's nothing wrong with that - she's allowed to be sexual in any way she chooses! Anyone who judges her on that wants to take a good hard look at themselves and ask why they're so bothered or judgemental over what another human being chooses to do with her body. |
|
|
|
|
|
#154 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25,462
|
Quote:
In my original OP I cited it was James only who had publicly condemned the calendar.
I later discovered statements such as this in the articles discussing James apparent distaste The shots come after controversy regarding BBC Executives asking their Strictly Come Dancing stars to tone down their provocative spin-off projects. In particular, BBC Bosses are said to be worried that 'tacky' spin-off projects are damaging the hit show's wholesome family image. The statement above can be found in the below link http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...6-calendar.htm But I am not particularly interested in the BBC views on the matter, but that of DS posters..! Hence why the OP states the opinion of James only not that of the BBC.If the BBC had sent around an EMail or letter then someone would have passed on to the media. I suspect that the BBC would be more concerned if any of the professionals used the 'Strictly Come Dancing' brand commercially. Ola is just doing what other female professionals have done this year and in previous years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#155 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
|
Quote:
There is a double standard at work on the thread now I have had chance to read it in its entirety.
Gleb Savchenko ripped off his shirt and that was on the "family orientated" show itself.Somehow I doubt the ladies who object to a beautiful lady posing for sexy shots immediately called OFCOM to complain about the buff gent with his top off on Strictly. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
'are said to be' is the crucial phrase.
If the BBC had sent around an EMail or letter then someone would have passed on to the media. I suspect that the BBC would be more concerned if any of the professionals used the 'Strictly Come Dancing' brand commercially. Ola is just doing what other female professionals have done this year and in previous years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#157 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,727
|
Quote:
Why is it sleazy? Because an attractive woman is posing in a provocative way? What a load of nonsense!
Sleazy has connotations of being unhand or without consent. If an attractive woman chooses to pose in a sexy way then there's nothing wrong with that - she's allowed to be sexual in any way she chooses! Anyone who judges her on that wants to take a good hard look at themselves and ask why they're so bothered or judgemental over what another human being chooses to do with her body. It just means vulgar. I think posing with hardly anything on, with your legs spread, pouring milk over yourself (clearly to represent what plenty of people on here have said) is a bit vulgar. If you don't agree, fine, I actually said that if she and James are happy with it then fair enough. We're all entitled to our opinions and I'm not going to tell you that you 'need to take a look at yourself' because I don't agree with yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On the ground
Posts: 3,686
|
Quote:
Is there anything wrong with what you regard as " soft porn?"
Although I do not perceive this calendar as soft porn in all honesty but I concede that is down to personal perception. If Ola did a calendar dressed in her jim jams with no make up on it may not sell in such large numbers., (although doubtless she would still look beautiful!) You'd have to read it all in context and then understand and then make a relevant comment, I won't wait. |
|
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Away with the faries
Posts: 27,378
|
Quote:
What made you remember that interview?
|
|
|
|
|
#161 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,484
|
This whole story just proves that Ola is a woman with two arses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
What a blast from the past!
What made you remember that interview? ![]() ![]() Plus - she really is a very nice person. James has a nice person somewhere within him, but a lot of other stuff too - Ola is just the good stuff, so they are different, but strangely compatible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 1,663
|
Quote:
I've always been a fan of Ola - plus I agree with the sentiments expressed.
![]() Plus - she really is a very nice person. James has a nice person somewhere within him, but a lot of other stuff too - Ola is just the good stuff, so they are different, but strangely compatible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Land of Glitter
Posts: 2,573
|
Quote:
I'm not keen on the calendar, but I agree about James and Ola.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51.



show itself.
- its sleazy and she and James both know it...
It just means vulgar. I think posing with hardly anything on, with your legs spread, pouring milk over yourself (clearly to represent what plenty of people on here have said) is a bit vulgar. If you don't agree, fine, I actually said that if she and James are happy with it then fair enough. We're all entitled to our opinions and I'm not going to tell you that you 'need to take a look at yourself' because I don't agree with yours.
What made you remember that interview? 