|
||||||||
Why is no one campaigning to free the Walford One? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,413
|
Why is no one campaigning to free the Walford One?
OK, so I get that jake wood has taken a year off from Ee but I can't help but feel that it's a little unrealistic (!) that he has been sent to jail and that everyone in Walford are either happy to believe it's him or know it's not him but are happy for him to take the blame. Surely at least a couple of people would still be trying to support him or help him with an appeal? It's totally ridiculous that Carol jetted off on her bike knowing he was innocent but stating an appeal was a lost cause - that's not Carol at all! She'd fight tooth and nail for her family! Lauren hopped back on a plane to Peter without asking to speak to keeble or Marsden, or without going to the press to tell the truth. A front page reveal in a national newspaper would certainly have got things going! Even stacey who suddenly started questioning Jane stopped abruptly when max was carted off. it just doesn't add up. There would be at least one person who would still be trying to clear his name. Added to that, all the residents seem happy to believe it's him too - Ronnie was married to his brother but doesn't seem to have an opinion on it, dot's condemned her step son (even though she always stood by nick who she knew was a murderer) and Jay was once close to max when he was going out with Abi, but even he hasn't expressed disbelief. I know the writers have to cover max 's absence but I just don't think the continuity or realism is there. Rant over!
Last edited by MissMonkeyMoo : 20-10-2015 at 23:57. Reason: Autostart fail! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 510
|
Basically it's because the people who write Eastenders write what they are told to write, and the people who tell them what to write are sometimes very sloppy at their job.
Of course it's unrealistic, even within the licensed "reality" of Eastenders. Very unprofessional. Every now and the Eastenders gets like that. Right now it's about at its worst. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 43,728
|
Can't stand him recently, glad to have a break!
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 8,641
|
As you have rightly highlighted the storyline us disjointed and provides no logical patterns to the characters involved in this narrative.
As with many other Eastenders plots, I think they will just provide that one moment that supposedly resolves the issue without careful development of the plot and the characters involved. In this case Max will suddenly return and the fact that he has appeared from no where back onto our screens will 'make us think oh my gosh he's back.' |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,677
|
Because Max never captured the nations hearts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
I think Sorcha chained herself to some railings outside Buck House but it didn't work.
Good post btw. It's made all involved look mendacious or stupid or both. I don't mind suspending my disbelief but come on! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,151
|
From the title I thought this was about Christine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,209
|
I'm surprised that Stacey hasn't done anything since she's the only one on the square who cares about Max. She asked Jane why Max shouted that Bobby killed Lucy, but Jane was stressed so Stacey thought it was best not to ask again.
Can't Max tell the police that Jane herself confessed to him that she had helped to protect Bobby and that she should be questioned? They probably won't believe him but they could atleast be a little suspicious. If only Lauren went to any other police officer other than Bryant
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,101
|
I wrote to my MP weeks ago and am still waiting for a reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Coventry, Warwickshire
Posts: 4,930
|
Just waiting for the paint to dry on my banner then I'll join in the march to Downing Street. Not sure if I should add glitter while I'm waiting or if it will be overkill. Don't let me keep you waiting though.
Riot on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Coventry, Warwickshire
Posts: 4,930
|
Quote:
I think Sorcha chained herself to some railings outside Buck House but it didn't work.
Good post btw. It's made all involved look mendacious or stupid or both. I don't mind suspending my disbelief but come on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,663
|
I think there are a few reasons why,
1. it has been revealed that the actor is taking a year out and will be back. So we know he will be back. If the they had been professional this vital snippet of info should never have been revealed. 2. the story has been done to death among all soaps. Someone gets falsely accused, gets sent down, and we all know they justice will be done. 3. Max is very different from 90s Deadrie Barlow. Hes not strictly a nice character. If it was someone like Honey, Barry Evans etc who had not done anything bad and who had an air of vulnerability about them we would be concerned. but Max jumped from wife to wife, hasn't had the best relationship with his daughters, cheated with Stacey and again later on Vanessa with Tanya, and of course, hes there in the first place because he hes had sex with a vulnerable, confused young woman. Hes almost on Dean's level. hes always chasing skirt. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
|
Don't worry. Chrissie Watts is due to be released soon.
The Walford One is coming home, lads. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,564
|
Quote:
I think there are a few reasons why,
1. it has been revealed that the actor is taking a year out and will be back. So we know he will be back. If the they had been professional this vital snippet of info should never have been revealed. 2. the story has been done to death among all soaps. Someone gets falsely accused, gets sent down, and we all know they justice will be done. 3. Max is very different from 90s Deadrie Barlow. Hes not strictly a nice character. If it was someone like Honey, Barry Evans etc who had not done anything bad and who had an air of vulnerability about them we would be concerned. but Max jumped from wife to wife, hasn't had the best relationship with his daughters, cheated with Stacey and again later on Vanessa with Tanya, and of course, hes there in the first place because he hes had sex with a vulnerable, confused young woman. Hes almost on Dean's level. hes always chasing skirt. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,413
|
Quote:
3. Max is very different from 90s Deadrie Barlow. Hes not strictly a nice character. If it was someone like Honey, Barry Evans etc who had not done anything bad and who had an air of vulnerability about them we would be concerned. but Max jumped from wife to wife, hasn't had the best relationship with his daughters, cheated with Stacey and again later on Vanessa with Tanya, and of course, hes there in the first place because he hes had sex with a vulnerable, confused young woman. Hes almost on Dean's level. hes always chasing skirt. As for comparing max to Dean, that's way of the mark. Max isn't a rapist nor does he deliberately abuse his girlfriends with scissors or hot curling irons. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,526
|
Quote:
Max is a thoroughly unpleasant character but there's a big difference between him and a rapist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,148
|
Because nobody cares that he's banged up. He's thoroughly unpleasant and deserves to be jailed just for that
.Deirdre was a really nice person and was conned. She didn't deserve to be convicted. The public don't like con men, real or fictitious.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,716
|
I love Max, one of my favourite characters, but there's no point in getting bogged down with a desire for justice. He's off screen for a year and I'm not THAT invested in the character that I want him to be freed off screen only for us to hear he's gone off to party with Carol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,712
|
Quote:
Can't stand him recently, glad to have a break!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,413
|
Quote:
Because nobody cares that he's banged up. He's thoroughly unpleasant and deserves to be jailed just for that
.Deirdre was a really nice person and was conned. She didn't deserve to be convicted. The public don't like con men, real or fictitious.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,086
|
Quote:
Max is a thoroughly unpleasant character but there's a big difference between him and a rapist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
Quote:
I heard she was last seen digging a tunnel to break him out of his cell. She may have got the context wrong about spooning him.
![]() Lucky Max.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
|
Quote:
Because nobody cares that he's banged up. He's thoroughly unpleasant and deserves to be jailed just for that
.Deirdre was a really nice person and was conned. She didn't deserve to be convicted. The public don't like con men, real or fictitious.. ![]() In what way is max unpleasant. Aside from his sex addiction he's an ok bloke. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39.



Riot on!

.