Originally Posted by victoriasponge:
“Yes, why not. What I do consider unfair is that some of the celebs with previous experience are "outed", e.g. Helen's ballet experience which they went on and on about in the first few shows, while others' experience is carefully concealed, e.g. Jay's.
Most of the general viewing public only hear what's on the show and maybe ITT and they just take what they're given at face value.”
I do take your point and it is a valid way to look at it.
BIB
When they 'outed' Helen - as you say - it was to explain how having done Ballet made it more difficult for her to learn Ballroom and Latin.
The show has very rarely delved into celeb's dance histories during the show or ITT. If they did, then they would end up being accused of bias because they didn't assess everyone exactly correctly or give them all equal publicity.
The producers are the ones who make the decisions and run the show. Even more so than in previous years, the celebs/pros have less input. The producers are the ones that the complaints should be directed towards.
It is not a dance contest, but is based (or was) on a dance learning contest. The decision in the final is purely on public voting. There has been publicity in several 'newspapers' about the previous dance experience of several of the dancers - particularly Jay and Helen, so people who are interested in Strictly may be aware of the past experience of some of the celebs.
The whole emphasis of Strictly seems to me to have been drifting away from the original remit, and I would prefer that it went back to what it was like in Series 9 and earlier.