|
||||||||
'I'm struggling' |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
'I'm struggling'
Is anyone else sick of this phrase? Lord Sugar says it almost every week in the boardroom.
I remember that back in the early years, Lord Sugar used to be very eloquent, could respond with a quick retort to almost anything. I feel like he's losing it. His age perhaps? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,250
|
It's becoming a bit of a pet hate now. Especially when he says something like, "John, you were a terrible project manager, your business plan is flawed and I don't like you. It is for that reason...... I'm struggling. Steve, you're fired".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,397
|
Quote:
Is anyone else sick of this phrase? Lord Sugar says it almost every week in the boardroom.
I remember that back in the early years, Lord Sugar used to be very eloquent, could respond with a quick retort to almost anything. I feel like he's losing it. His age perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
It's becoming a bit of a pet hate now. Especially when he says something like, "John, you were a terrible project manager, your business plan is flawed and I don't like you. It is for that reason...... I'm struggling. Steve, you're fired".
It's one of those things where once you've noticed it, it's going to keep bugging you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Scotland .
Posts: 5,660
|
The boardroom should be renamed the bored room . The same old shtick every time , scripted to the max and badly acted out by Sugar .
It's like the producers are taking the piss . "Hell yeah folks , we've found a formula that works and gets decent ratings , lets beat it to death till the viewers scream in agony for mercy " (or turn off) . It's become like a TOWIE for slightly more intelligent people . I feel dirty watching that mess tonight . (Slight exaggeration there for dramatic effect , but you get the idea .) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Rebel County
Posts: 17,761
|
Quote:
Is anyone else sick of this phrase? Lord Sugar says it almost every week in the boardroom.
I remember that back in the early years, Lord Sugar used to be very eloquent, could respond with a quick retort to almost anything. I feel like he's losing it. His age perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Isn't it more of a thing since the switch to business partner? There's no struggle with who would be an employee, but he must know their business idea, so maybe the struggle is how much money he might be potentially throwing away?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
I'm struggling to keep watching. He's struggling ... to think of something else to say having built up a case to fire someone then back away from it. The whole pre-firing summing up is getting very predictable. You know he'll feint to sack each of them once, struggle with himself
![]() , and then fire someone. He's suffering from a bad case of "resultus prolongem ad infinitum", the syndrome suffered by all reality TV shows where the producers imagine that prolonging the outcome will build tension.It's a shame he doesn't struggle to think up all those terrible puns. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
Quote:
Isn't it more of a thing since the switch to business partner? There's no struggle with who would be an employee, but he must know their business idea, so maybe the struggle is how much money he might be potentially throwing away?
![]() I'm pretty sure he only started struggling this series. Maybe it's Claude's fault. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On the ground
Posts: 3,686
|
Quote:
I mean, I don't mind him having a fire-teasing, but it shouldn't be as blatantly obvious as that.
It's one of those things where once you've noticed it, it's going to keep bugging you. This programme is running out of legs |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Rebel County
Posts: 17,761
|
Quote:
No, please, not something else to blame on the change of prize.
I'm pretty sure he only started struggling this series. Maybe it's Claude's fault.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,455
|
'And for that reason ... I'm struggling to see why you should stay' is 'You're not fired'.
As far as I remember, it used to be a summary of each person's weak points, then a 'But not even turning up for the task is too casual for me - you're fired'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
Is anyone else sick of this phrase? Lord Sugar says it almost every week in the boardroom.
I remember that back in the early years, Lord Sugar used to be very eloquent, could respond with a quick retort to almost anything. I feel like he's losing it. His age perhaps? You just know he's been coached by those producers at every stage, how they think it will make exciting tv . He know longer thinks for himself it's just scripted . I remember one ex-apprentice saying the board room went on for ages because he was not happy with his lines and they had to do it again and again . |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,228
|
Quote:
Nah, it's just the usual contrived Apprentice script, getting more and more contrived. It's like on The X Factor where Simon double and triple bluffs you - "It's not good news...you're going to have to come back and do all of this again"...
![]() It's just to build faux tension. It is for that reason........ (the viewer thinks oh they're gone but then boom)...... that I'm struggling to decide.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
This.
It's just to build faux tension. It is for that reason........ (the viewer thinks oh they're gone but then boom)...... that I'm struggling to decide.... He even did the fire-teasing back in Series 1, but it worked, not because people didn't know the format but because it wasn't as blatant or obvious. In Task 3 he said: 'Adele... you have let me down, Adele. You have let me down. Really, you have let me down, because I put my bet on you. I let you be the task leader this time, and I'm hearing bits and pieces about lack of control in certain areas and disorganisation. I'm very, very disappointed, I've got to tell you. But I'll tell you what disappoints me the most. Lack of respect for the leader, bickering and arguing, wasting time. And on that basis, Miranda, I've got to tell you, you're fired. It was clear why he'd fired Miranda over Adele, even though many didn't personally agree with it. Doing that would still work today. If there had been a justifiable reason to fire Jenny over Vana, I'd have accepted that. Lord Sugar does not explain it eloquently. Or maybe he does, and the producers think we don't want to see it and cut it out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,397
|
Quote:
The thing is, he even did the fire-teasing back in Series 1, but it worked, not because people didn't know the format but because it wasn't as blatant or obvious.
In Task 3 he said: 'Adele... you have let me down, Adele. You have let me down. Really, you have let me down, because I put my bet on you. I let you be the task leader this time, and I'm hearing bits and pieces about lack of control in certain areas and disorganisation. I'm very, very disappointed, I've got to tell you. But I'll tell you what disappoints me the most. Lack of respect for the leader, bickering and arguing, wasting time. And on that basis, Miranda, I've got to tell you, you're fired. It was clear why he'd fired Miranda over Adele, even though many didn't personally agree with it. Doing that would still work today. If there had been a justifiable reason to fire Jenny over Vana, I'd have accepted that. Lord Sugar does not explain it eloquently. Or maybe he does, and the producers think we don't want to see it and cut it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
George, have you ever thought of going on Mastermind with The Apprentice as your specialist subject? I salute your encyclopaedic knowledge!
![]() Admittedly I didn't remember that Series 1 quote work for word, I looked it up on YouTube so I could write it down exactly, but I remembered enough of it that I knew exactly what I had to look up. In all seriousness, if the producers have trained Lord Sugar on what to say, they really haven't trained him very well, have they? If anything, I'd say he needs a bit more training, it's far too obvious as it is. I didn't want Jenny to go, but I was able to predict for most of the boardroom that she was going to. Was just hoping I was wrong, but sadly not. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,187
|
He's also started to sound tired, the first few series he was a lot quicker and harsher...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
I do wish he'd occasionally just pop off and fire someone without having to sum the whole thing up like it's a Poirot. It's a lot more exciting on the US version (it's about the only thing I prefer) where you genuinely don't know when Trump's going to fire someone because he's so capricious and could just suddenly jab the finger halfway through a random sentence about nothing. I know it's happened a couple of times before (Jenny C, Robert) but both of those were before the "final boardroom".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,221
|
Yeah, when he says I'm struggling now, its usually to someone he's going to let off the hook
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 2,403
|
Another is "it's a complete and utter shambles". That seems to come out at least once an episode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
I do wish he'd occasionally just pop off and fire someone without having to sum the whole thing up like it's a Poirot. It's a lot more exciting on the US version (it's about the only thing I prefer) where you genuinely don't know when Trump's going to fire someone because he's so capricious and could just suddenly jab the finger halfway through a random sentence about nothing. I know it's happened a couple of times before (Jenny C, Robert) but both of those were before the "final boardroom".
NBC just do a much better job at editing and production than the Beeb. Like I mean I cannot imagine this happening on the BBC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2u8OVK4qD4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,230
|
Quote:
Is anyone else sick of this phrase? Lord Sugar says it almost every week in the boardroom.
I remember that back in the early years, Lord Sugar used to be very eloquent, could respond with a quick retort to almost anything. I feel like he's losing it. His age perhaps? Sugar is turning into a carrot that sits in the bottom of the fridge, going all soft and black at the end. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
He's also started to sound tired, the first few series he was a lot quicker and harsher...
Although we don't like to stereotype, when The Apprentice started Lord Sugar was 57. He is now 68. It would make sense that his reactions are not as swift or sharp as they once were. He now sounds either unwilling or unable to sum up his thoughts coherently. I do take people's points about how the producers have trained him to add suspense, but to be honest I think if that's the case the producers really haven't done it effectively. Even five years ago, he spoke a lot more clearly than he does now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
Yes I agree LS isn't as sharp as he once was. The boardrooms have been a bit flat this year. I do feel he has lost some passion for the show now.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:42.




, and then fire someone. He's suffering from a bad case of "resultus prolongem ad infinitum", the syndrome suffered by all reality TV shows where the producers imagine that prolonging the outcome will build tension.