|
||||||||
'I'm struggling' |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,113
|
The show would die a horrid death without Lord Sugar
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Just as long as they don't have that Marcus Bentley doing the voice over. He always sounds like he's getting off on a power trip when he says people have been evicted, and sounds like he's constantly mocking someone.
And to be honest, I think something similar has happened with Mark Halliley, although not to the same extreme. His manner was a lot more documentary-style in the early series - he'd actually explain things that were going on offscreen, so you got a more accurate impression of what was going on in the tasks. These days, not only has he tried to sound more 'showbizlike', but he doesn't really say anything that you can't tell from watching it. The show would be just as clear without his narration. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,395
|
Quote:
Marcus Bentley was good to start with. If you watch the early years of Big Brother, there was nothing wrong with him, he was a decent narrator. Now he's become a parody of himself. He almost sounds like someone doing an impression of Marcus Bentley.
And to be honest, I think something similar has happened with Mark Halliley, although not to the same extreme. His manner was a lot more documentary-style in the early series - he'd actually explain things that were going on offscreen, so you got a more accurate impression of what was going on in the tasks. These days, not only has he tried to sound more 'showbizlike', but he doesn't really say anything that you can't tell from watching it. The show would be just as clear without his narration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Yeah like many US reality shows its the "talent" who talk the viewer through whats happening and film loads of extra commentary and narration after the task itself has finished.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
Because The Apprentice has ended in all the other countries where it was hosted by people other than Lord Sugar. Even Donald Trump's American original just limps along with celebrity series.
This means there really is something special about the British series, and the most obvious is Lord Sugar. It might not be him, it could be Dara or Nick Hewer or the production team or just the fact the BBC can show a whole episode without commercial breaks. But we should be careful what changes we wish for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
I think that The Apprentice only really works if the host is likeable - for me, at least. I've never really taken to Donald Trump - from the little I've seen, he seems exceptionally ruthless and not willing to tolerate any other point of view. He probably makes for more drama, and perhaps that is what American audiences want, but it's not why I watch the show. Yes, it's nice to have someone who cuts through all the bullshit, but I like to see someone who underneath that bravado comes across as a nice person who makes fair decisions.
Lord Sugar, though I will be the first to admit his faults, comes across like that. Admittedly he doesn't anymore so much as he once did, but we've seen enough of his softer side for me to have some time for him. He fires people if they're not up to scratch, but we also see him giving people a chance sometimes. I think his passion for Young Apprentice as well was one of the things that made me take to him; I was sixteen when the first series of Junior Apprentice started, which was around the time I got into the show generally (I'm now 22). For me at the time, I was becoming increasingly aware of society's assumption that people of my age were all hoodie-wearing, weapon-carrying thugs with ASBOs, and I appreciated the fact that in Lord Sugar, we had someone successful who actually seemed to have more faith in young people. It is well-known on this forum that I'm a very passionate defender of Young Apprentice, and indeed I did think it was better than the adult show. There are a few reasons for this; I prefer series with fewer candidates as you have more of a chance to get to know them all, and the fact that at the time I was quite close in age to them meant that I could identify more with them. But the most fundamental reason for my enthusiasm for Young Apprentice is because we saw a side of Lord Sugar that I liked. I think a lot of people complained that he'd softened himself up for the younger contestants, but I don't think that at all. On the contrary, I think that what he is known to be is quite a caricature that is played up, and on Young Apprentice we saw a more natural, down-to-earth side of him - more like what I imagine him to be like when the cameras are not on him. That is what I like in a host. Whilst the host needs to be tough, they do also have to be decent enough to earn some grudging respect from the viewers. I think that's why The Apprentice Australia appealed to me; I liked Mark Bouris, he seemed more willing to give each candidate a chance to defend themselves rather than taking on the infamous hard-as-nails approach. It is the only incarnation of The Apprentice other than our own that I have enjoyed. Unfortunately they only made one non-celebrity series. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,281
|
Another boring one is "OK I've heard enough, I don't want to hear anything more from anyone now" and EVERY SINGLE TIME one of the candidates attempts to interrupt again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
I think that The Apprentice only really works if the host is likeable - for me, at least. I've never really taken to Donald Trump - from the little I've seen, he seems exceptionally ruthless and not willing to tolerate any other point of view. He probably makes for more drama, and perhaps that is what American audiences want, but it's not why I watch the show. Yes, it's nice to have someone who cuts through all the bullshit, but I like to see someone who underneath that bravado comes across as a nice person who makes fair decisions.
. I think if the producers were more innovative Sugar wouldn't seem as stale as he seems to at the moment, its a producer's responsibility to keep a show fresh. They seem to just be making "The Apprentice by numbers" |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
On the Celebrity Version Trump comes across friendlier probably because its less serious. He'll regularly say "I hate doing this" (in relation to firing) and "People think I like firing people, I don't".
I think if the producers were more innovative Sugar wouldn't seem as stale as he seems to at the moment, its a producer's responsibility to keep a show fresh. They seem to just be making "The Apprentice by numbers" |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
Yes, they could do so much more with the tasks. They are getting quite samey. There was a task in The Apprentice USA to renovate and run a motel! It was a great task.
Perhaps Lord Sugar as well as Karren are getting tired of the show now. I really hope it could go on without him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
Yes, they could do so much more with the tasks. They are getting quite samey. There was a task in The Apprentice USA to renovate and run a motel! It was a great task.
Perhaps Lord Sugar as well as Karren are getting tired of the show now. I really hope it could go on without him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 900
|
Quote:
Yes, they could do so much more with the tasks. They are getting quite samey. There was a task in The Apprentice USA to renovate and run a motel! It was a great task.
They could also do more with the treats. I know the budget is limited but the losing team, and viewers, should be jealous most weeks, with a couple of jaw-droppers towards the end. I think it was Paul Tulip who once exclaimed, "treats don't suck," on being sent to Rome, and the producers need to get back to that and beyond sushi, yoga and wine-tasting so far this series. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Quote:
The appearance of the buying and advertising tasks so early in the series may well mean the tasks have been revamped, with new ones to follow, and it is not just the same old 10 in the wrong order.
They could also do more with the treats. I know the budget is limited but the losing team, and viewers, should be jealous most weeks, with a couple of jaw-droppers towards the end. I think it was Paul Tulip who once exclaimed, "treats don't suck," on being sent to Rome, and the producers need to get back to that and beyond sushi, yoga and wine-tasting so far this series. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Back after a much-needed break
Posts: 6,406
|
Quote:
The appearance of the buying and advertising tasks so early in the series may well mean the tasks have been revamped, with new ones to follow, and it is not just the same old 10 in the wrong order.
They could also do more with the treats. I know the budget is limited but the losing team, and viewers, should be jealous most weeks, with a couple of jaw-droppers towards the end. I think it was Paul Tulip who once exclaimed, "treats don't suck," on being sent to Rome, and the producers need to get back to that and beyond sushi, yoga and wine-tasting so far this series. Seeing what is often simply the second-worst bunch of people congratulating thmselves on their imagined "brilliance" isn't what I consider to be the heart of the show. I actually don't mind them having similar tasks as I quite like to compare their approach to those of previous teams. Mind you, I usually end up thinking "Have none of these people ever watched The Apprentice, or are they simply incapable of learning from others' mistakes?" ![]() I do feel that the weak point is the team of Karren and "Claude the cartoon baddie". I used to enjoy watching Margaret and Nick as they didn't say much, but when they did, it was worthwhile. Their replacements just seem cliched and predictable. As for Lord Shuggs, he's now coming across as too "scripted" for me. In the earlier series, he did have his catchphrases but I felt they were his own ... that was they way he normally spoke ... so he was simply being himself. It now just seems as though some "expert" has come along and decided he needs a new ctachphrase so they had a committee meeting and came up with something they thought would be "dramatic" ... and it isn't! In fact, I get the impression Shuggs isn't entirely comfortable with it so is just going through the motions. Of course, I may be over-analysing things!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,171
|
One thing I've wondered as someone who started watching the shows fairly late in their run...
Was Alan Sugar a big name before the Apprentice? I know he's always held up as a big business name and a huge success, but I feel in the newer series, the only knowledge of that comes from the things he himself says, and people in the BBC say on the show itself. What I mean is, when he was 57 when the show started, was "a job with well-known businessman Alan Sugar" a great reward that lots of people would understand in and of itself? Because nowadays, it seems that its all about the money and the TV show. Alan Sugar is the prize, kind of, but only because he happens to be A rich businessman - in that sense, it could be anybody giving it away and the result would be the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,395
|
Quote:
One thing I've wondered as someone who started watching the shows fairly late in their run...
Was Alan Sugar a big name before the Apprentice? I know he's always held up as a big business name and a huge success, but I feel in the newer series, the only knowledge of that comes from the things he himself says, and people in the BBC say on the show itself. What I mean is, when he was 57 when the show started, was "a job with well-known businessman Alan Sugar" a great reward that lots of people would understand in and of itself? Because nowadays, it seems that its all about the money and the TV show. Alan Sugar is the prize, kind of, but only because he happens to be A rich businessman - in that sense, it could be anybody giving it away and the result would be the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,736
|
Quote:
One thing I've wondered as someone who started watching the shows fairly late in their run...
Was Alan Sugar a big name before the Apprentice? I know he's always held up as a big business name and a huge success, but I feel in the newer series, the only knowledge of that comes from the things he himself says, and people in the BBC say on the show itself. What I mean is, when he was 57 when the show started, was "a job with well-known businessman Alan Sugar" a great reward that lots of people would understand in and of itself? Because nowadays, it seems that its all about the money and the TV show. Alan Sugar is the prize, kind of, but only because he happens to be A rich businessman - in that sense, it could be anybody giving it away and the result would be the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Back after a much-needed break
Posts: 6,406
|
Quote:
One thing I've wondered as someone who started watching the shows fairly late in their run...
Was Alan Sugar a big name before the Apprentice? I know he's always held up as a big business name and a huge success, but I feel in the newer series, the only knowledge of that comes from the things he himself says, and people in the BBC say on the show itself. What I mean is, when he was 57 when the show started, was "a job with well-known businessman Alan Sugar" a great reward that lots of people would understand in and of itself? Because nowadays, it seems that its all about the money and the TV show. Alan Sugar is the prize, kind of, but only because he happens to be A rich businessman - in that sense, it could be anybody giving it away and the result would be the same. That awareness wasn't just confined to people interested in business or electronics as he was often in the sports news as a result of his links to Spurs. (EDIT - Alrightmate beat me to it! )As such, he had quite a high profile for a "businessman". |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
Quote:
I always knew him from Amstrad in the home computer heyday, but maybe that's not mass celebrity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
You know he'll feint to sack each of them once, struggle with himself
![]() , and then fire someone.Quote:
Yeah like many US reality shows its the "talent" who talk the viewer through whats happening and film loads of extra commentary and narration after the task itself has finished.
Quote:
Another boring one is "OK I've heard enough, I don't want to hear anything more from anyone now" and EVERY SINGLE TIME one of the candidates attempts to interrupt again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,509
|
Quote:
It's becoming a bit of a pet hate now. Especially when he says something like, "John, you were a terrible project manager, your business plan is flawed and I don't like you. It is for that reason...... I'm struggling. Steve, you're fired".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
Do you think the producers have found this thread and are like, 'Damn, they've caught onto the 'I'm struggling' card! Quick, let's edit it out of the next few episodes before broadcast...'
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
As we've all noticed it the editors would certainly have noticed it while putting the shows together. Trouble is, if they cut out the struggling what can they replace it with? The time to pick it up and correct it would have been during filming. It should have been obvious then too. With a bit of luck the penny dropped and by week 4 he had been told to say something different. We can but hope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
|
He didn't say it this week, I don't think?
On the other hand, the word 'ruthless' was used so much that I was thinking, 'That is so being used as a pun about Ruth!' |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
That Ruthless thing was so clearly done deliberately, who on earth is writing these lines.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16.






, and then fire someone.