DS Forums

 
 

Wonder if the psychologists will go on ITT in the future?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23-10-2015, 17:54
Tall Paul
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,584

Just thought of something and I'm wondering if the psychologists who appear on BBBOTS like Judy james, dr pam spurr and all of that lot will be asked by ITT producers to read through the psychology of the couples and that? I know I don't agree with the psychologists always, however they do have a point and a lot what they say is quite near to the truth.
Tall Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 23-10-2015, 17:55
StigOfTheKrump
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34,758
What would the point of that be?
StigOfTheKrump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 18:47
Kat 68
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 423
Why?! Big Brother is all about mind games, SCD is about dance. The 2 programmes have nothing in common.
Kat 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 18:49
Tall Paul
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,584
Why?! Big Brother is all about mind games, SCD is about dance. The 2 programmes have nothing in common.
However you can vote on both shows.
Tall Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 19:11
davegold
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,217
A psychologist already has been on ITT. Pamela Stephenson.
davegold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 19:14
Tall Paul
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,584
A psychologist already has been on ITT. Pamela Stephenson.
Would love to see her on again, Judy james and Dr pam spurr interest me even if I don't always agree. Depends really if their busy with other commitments, however it's an idea. Whether the chefs at BBC towers agree with me on this or not is up to them.
Tall Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 19:24
StigOfTheKrump
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34,758
However you can vote on both shows.
You can also vote in general elections. Doesn't mean you need psychologists to analyse their every move though. It'd be completely against the point of Strictly.
StigOfTheKrump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 19:26
spider9
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: On the sofa
Posts: 4,319
Judy James was on ITT during series 2 talking about the pyscological effect of different pro's training methods.

She concluded that Erin was the best teacher because of the way she treated Julian Clary. Monkseal will remember the details.
spider9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 19:28
Tall Paul
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,584
Judy James was on ITT during series 2 talking about the pyscological effect of different pro's training methods.

She concluded that Erin was the best teacher because of the way she treated Julian Clary. Monkseal will remember the details.
Thanks for the info.
Tall Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 19:45
A.D.P
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7,319
Just thought of something and I'm wondering if the psychologists who appear on BBBOTS like Judy james, dr pam spurr and all of that lot will be asked by ITT producers to read through the psychology of the couples and that? I know I don't agree with the psychologists always, however they do have a point and a lot what they say is quite near to the truth.
Another pointless thread, this is the BBC, it's not going to happen, and why would we want it.
A.D.P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 19:48
Monkseal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
Judy James was on ITT during series 2 talking about the pyscological effect of different pro's training methods.

She concluded that Erin was the best teacher because of the way she treated Julian Clary. Monkseal will remember the details.
I really wouldn't expect me to listen to anything that halfwit says at the time, let alone remember it 11 years later.
Monkseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 19:49
allaboard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: All at sea in a pea green boat
Posts: 1,322
Any attempt to morph the show into anything resembling Big Brother will see the core audience switch off in droves.
allaboard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2015, 23:10
beebopbabsie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 261
Why?! Big Brother is all about mind games, SCD is about dance. The 2 programmes have nothing in common.
That's very true. I replied to another thread, asking why Strictly's producers would want to copy what is done on Big Brother. They are NOT the same show and thank goodness for it.
beebopbabsie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2015, 00:37
j4Rose
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,259
I really wouldn't expect me to listen to anything that halfwit says at the time, let alone remember it 11 years later.
Haha
j4Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2015, 00:51
Tall Paul
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,584
Any attempt to morph the show into anything resembling Big Brother will see the core audience switch off in droves.
I'm talking about the spin off show. By the way I'm being jumped on this thread when I've done nothing wrong at all.
Tall Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2015, 01:12
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,125
You can also vote in general elections. Doesn't mean you need psychologists to analyse their every move though. It'd be completely against the point of Strictly.
Ooooh now I think you might be onto something there Stig. We could have a bunch of pop psychs doing sound bites of cod psychology to make the next general election more ....urrrmmm ,,,, entertaining or something.
An Thropologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2015, 01:27
dancingbearbear
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,299
It would be a waste of time. It's not remotely authentic. The psychologists on BB didn't sit through hours of footage in order to construct a considered assessment of a particular individual/event. They were given a few clips chosen by the production team, with it being obvious that the clips had been selected to steer the assessment in a particular direction (e.g. Person a is aggressive, persons b & c fancy each other, etc.) I knew one of the psychologists who worked on it, and was taught by a friend of another psychologist who appeared on their spin-off shows, which is how I know a bit about how they spin it. This was back in its earliest years, so I couldn't say for certain that they still do it that way, and I've never watched it so I don't know what 'insights' they come up with.

This just reminded me of the 'expert' training commentary Craig used to do on ITT, and how funny it was when someone on here revealed that he was actually given the clips and the comments to go with them by a former SCD pro (might have been Paul Killick, I can't remember now).
dancingbearbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2015, 09:29
mimi dlc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,043
I'm talking about the spin off show. By the way I'm being jumped on this thread when I've done nothing wrong at all.
Nobody has jumped on you, merely said they don't see the point of psychological assessment on Strictly. Failing to agree with you is not the same as jumping on you.

I personally can't stand Big Brother, and would hate to see Strictly turned INTO a BB clone
mimi dlc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2015, 09:58
holly berry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,372
I hate cod psychology and wouldn't want to see any move in that direction from Strictly.

In the first few weeks I wouldn't mind seeing some workshop sections where celebs who are having difficulty remembering basic steps or getting them right are 'helped' to break them down and find out what is getting in the way and then it could progress to combinations of steps, developing a strong core etc.

There's nothing more frustrating than knowing what you should be doing and your body doing something different
holly berry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-10-2015, 15:32
beebopbabsie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 261
Nobodyb has jumped on you, merely said they don't see the point of psychological assessment on Strictly. Failing to agree with you is not the same as jumping on you.

I personally can't stand Big Brother, and would hate to see Strictly turned INTO a BB clone
That is exactly what I was thinking.
beebopbabsie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2015, 01:58
TerryM22
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,987
I'm talking about the spin off show. By the way I'm being jumped on this thread when I've done nothing wrong at all.
I enjoy watching the Big Brother spin off show 'Bit on the side' more than the main show at times Paul, It Takes Two could learn a thing or two.
TerryM22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2015, 10:15
tattieboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 36
Just thought of something and I'm wondering if the psychologists who appear on BBBOTS like Judy james, dr pam spurr and all of that lot will be asked by ITT producers to read through the psychology of the couples and that? I know I don't agree with the psychologists always, however they do have a point and a lot what they say is quite near to the truth.
I wish they would visit this forum!!
tattieboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2015, 14:23
EnJayKing
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Somewhere........out there
Posts: 1,181
Hmmm, psychologists talking nonsense or Vicky Gill talking about the shiny costumes....i'll stick with Vicky.
EnJayKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2015, 18:30
TerryM22
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,987
I wish they would visit this forum!!


The psychologists would have a field day, there is enough material here for a whole series of conventions.
TerryM22 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01.