Originally Posted by Fudd:
“I find it uneasy that it's Big Brother attempting to be a moral compass though. Threaten to rape someone with an epilator INSIDE the House? A slap on the wrist. Say something OUTSIDE the House... be invited and paid to enter the contest before being hauled over the coals. IMO Big Brother shouldn't have given him the cheap publicity before attempting to take the moral highground. They wanted him for ratings and no doubt they'll get them after tonight's display but that doesn't mean two wrongs make a right.”
Tonight's episode appeared to show the team of people working on Big Brother now have a very firm grip on these things, ultimately have good intentions, and know exactly when and how to intervene if things escalate. That's very reassuring after years of dubious production standards that started back in the C4 days.
I don't know that Winston was there for ratings, to be honest. He felt like a HM that was probably on the reserve list that got a call up because their first choice let them down. But for all that I didn't agree with his views in any way, it was right that he was allowed to enter. Threatening violence is another matter entirely, but that was not the case here.
You're always going to feel a range of emotions watching a series of Big Brother. We'd feel cheated if that was not the case. So yes, they will cast controversial types. But it's about making sure that if line is ever crossed, it's dealt with in the appropriate way.
Here they were dealing with a very difficult subject and handled it brilliantly. Personally I think homophobia is an issue not explored enough on primetime TV anyway. So if a show with as wide a viewership as this one is going to confront it head on and expose those views for what they are, then fantastic in my view.