|
||||||||
EastEnders Week 45 Spoilers |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South West England
Posts: 4,636
|
EastEnders Week 45 Spoilers
Monday 9th November 2015
Ronnie pushes forward with her plan to win Dean over and soon resorts to drastic measures. Mick and Shirley continue to build bridges but things soon take a turn. Masood shares an upsetting truth Tuesday 10th November 2015 Ronnie and Dean continue to fight for Roxy. Tensions grow at The Vic causing Elaine and Mick to come to blows. Thursday 12th November 2015 Ronnie, Roxy and Dean reach breaking point. Kim remains torn over Vincent but will she give him another chance? Billy is surprised when a familiar face returns to the Square. There is no episode on Friday 13th November because of CIN. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,233
|
This doesn't sound like the best week.
I loathe Dean with a passion, but Ronnie's running him close right now. As much as he's physically abusive to Roxy, Ronnie is pretty close to being emotionally abusive to her. It's deranged. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,318
|
t doesn't sound like Dean dies during the Halloween week then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 591
|
Well at least honey returns this week other than that this week sounds poor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
Vincent, Kim, Ronnie, Roxy, Dean, and Shirley. All of my favourites in one week. Can't wait...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,744
|
Oh great, Shirley is back
![]() Ronnie, Dean and Roxy = ![]() ![]() Kim and Vincent = YAWN |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
|
Quote:
Ronnie, Roxy, Dean and Shirley. All of my favourites in one week. Can't wait...
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
Shirley's back
![]() Billy and Honey ![]() ![]() No bloomin' Mitchells ![]() ![]() ...woops, should have said Phil and Sharon.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
Great to see Shirley's back.
And looks like Honey returns this week too, which means some more stuff for Billy. Elaine and Mick coming to blows will be good. A much needed break from the Mitchells too. Looks good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
"Mick and Shirley build bridges..."
Ooh great, because we haven't seen this before. "... Things take an unexpected turn" Let me guess, Dean turns up and Mick gets the 'ump and storms aaht. "Ronnie and Dean fight over Roxy" And the loser has to keep her "Will Kim give Vincent another chance?" Yes. Next. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
|
Bass bugger off
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,744
|
Quote:
"Mick and Shurley build bridges..."
Ooh great, because we haven't seen this before. "... Things take an unexpected turn" Let me guess, Dean turns up and Mick gets the 'ump and storms aaht. "Ronnie and Dean fight over Roxy" And the loser has to keep her "Will Kim give Vincent another chance?" Yes. Next. ![]() I am away that Monday so I will skip Monday's scenes as I can't be bothered with Shirley and Mick's scenes . I like Mick but don't like him and Shirley together.Great to see Honey back though
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
|
Quote:
Sorry sorcha, I'm only teasing
![]() ![]() I don't like the sound of mick forgiving shirley myself mind. Rinse repeat x 1000000 Mick is better with the immediate family and in the Vic imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,744
|
Quote:
I know
![]() I don't like the sound of mick forgiving shirley myself mind. Rinse repeat x 1000000 Mick is better with the immediate family and in the Vic imo. . That's probably why I can't stand Mick and Shirley together
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,021
|
Quote:
No bloomin' Mitchells
![]() ![]() ...woops, should have said Phil and Sharon.Now I am not trying to deny the Mitchells importance or that they have been a part of iconic storylines in the past but this incarnation of the family lacks the impact of previous ones. Sharon and Phil's circular relationship is stale. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,744
|
The Mitchells have a big storyline so they will probably be in the episodes. Oh wait, they are in that week's episodes because Ronnie and Roxy are Mitchells. The Mitchells are not the reason why viewing ratings are down. Unnecessary to single out the Mitchells only
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
|
Dan can't blame the ratings on non Mitchell related plots
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
I suspect the viewing figures are down because every storyline is going in circles and has done for months. It has nothing to do with the Mitchells having greater screen presence. Having Shirley and Dean back on screen will not see ratings go back up. That's just silly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,744
|
Quote:
I suspect the viewing figures are down because every storyline is going in circles and has done for months. It has nothing to do with the Mitchells having greater screen presence. Having Shirley and Dean back on screen will not see ratings go back up. That's just silly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
Quote:
It's funny how the Sharon and Phil antagonists are blaming them for the lack of ratings. Last week, they didn't feature but the ratings did not improve and it was a massive week for the Cokers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
|
Quote:
It's funny how the Sharon and Phil antagonists are blaming them for the lack of ratings. Last week, they didn't feature but the ratings did not improve and it was a massive week for the Cokers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
I think what is being pointed out is that a few posters have tried to say that if the Mitchell's are front and center then it will increase the ratings, evidently that is not as true as some would like to believe..
Viewing figures change frequently anyway depending on what is happened, and when. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
Quote:
I like the Mitchell stuff myself but usually they are used as an excuse as to why ratings are higher imo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,021
|
I generally subscribe to the view that bass55 has that ratings hover around a typical level (lower in the summer) and noticeably rise only for special/promoted eps (and not just ones featuring the Mitchells). But I think even around the normal level there's some fluctuation depending on how good or bad the show is. When the show is at the lower end of that it's enough for ED to take over since they are now so close which we are seeing at the moment. Not just that but the shares are getting poorer too and there's no excuse for that. I think what I said is true about this version of the Mitchell family not connecting with viewers as much as previous versions have. Several episodes rated higher than Phil and Sharon's wedding last year. JMO. Quote:
The Mitchells are not the reason why viewing ratings are down. Unnecessary to single out the Mitchells only
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:23.






...woops, should have said Phil and Sharon.

And looks like Honey returns this week too, which means some more stuff for Billy.