Originally Posted by Harlowe:
“I respect anyone in the Armed Forces, I have like many people, relatives who died in WW1 and fought in WW2, but people have a right to wear the poppy or not and it doesn't mean there a horrible person because they don't.
What about the government officials who wear theses poppies concealing the hypocrisy behind them considering they provide barely any after-care to soldiers after they leave the army, how many do we have that are suffering mental health issues with no support to help them back in to civilisation, inadequately equipped housing for veterans who have been disabled by war or even homeless and getting no help, be more concerned about that then someone not wearing a poppy.”
Originally Posted by _elly001:
“I have the utmost sympathy and respect for the men who fought and died for us in both world wars; young men, most of them, scared and dying in trenches on both sides of the battlefield. But I refuse to wear a symbol of military propaganda that glorifies current wars that I don't support, whether that was the original intention of the symbol or not.
Instead I'll remember them in my own way, by reading Dulce Et Decorum Est on the 11th November, as is my tradition.”
Just want to join in applauding both of these. You give me hope for humanity.
The hypocrisy of a lot of those who wear poppies, and insist others do as well, is staggering.
The meaning of the poppy has totally changed in my lifetime. It used to mean "never again". Now it seems to mean "I have no problem sending young men off to get blown up on a regular basis as long as we look after them afterwards." That's very different. I've got no truck with poppy fascism, and the insistence that not wearing them is unpatriotic. I'll stick money in a box for a veterans' fund no problem, because they do a tough job for very little reward, and can suffer horribly. But I won't wear what's become a symbol of war-mongering.