Originally Posted by icequeen:
“Jamelia is imo pregnant and the judges save her to be 'kind' - I think another poster mentioned this last week. That rhumba of Carol's was the worst serious dance I have ever seen.”
I don't think for a second that Jamelia is pregnant. I am pretty sure she would not have gone into Strictly if she were and it seems most years one of the females is pregnant. Last year so many people were convinced Ola was and, of course, she wasn't.
Originally Posted by sunnymeg:
“I think we may have a shock bottom two next week, which may change the way that subsequent votes are cast. I can see someone like Anita or Kellie finishing mid table and ending up in the dance off. Carol and Jeremy will soldier on untroubled until a good dancer bites the dust”
No, I doubt it. I think there is a good chance Jamelia will be there again and possibly Carol. If someone decent ends up there with Carol, Jamelia or Jeremy the judges will keep the decent dancer.
Personally I'd like to see Kellie in the dance off (although saved by the judges) as it may bring her down to earth a bit
Again, it seems every year people say a decent dancer will go over a not very good one and I don't really remember it happening.
Originally Posted by dostoy:
“How Carol can get 13 in week six and still not in the bottom two is outrageous.
We love losers/idiots/underdogs in this country.
Kirsty should not have gone, it should have been Carol.
Some people just vote for the dancer at the bottom of the leaderboard regardless of who it is.
They are very sad people with an extremely sad attitude.”
People can vote for who they like, whether it be on dancing ability, attitude or just that they like that person.
I haven't voted yet this year but if I were to it would probably be for Jeremy at the moment and then a few weeks down the line Jay.
I like Carol but I wouldn't vote for her. I don't though think she is a loser or an idiot and I also don't think that people who do vote for her are sad. That, I think, is a rude thing to say