|
||||||||
overmarked/undermarked |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,237
|
overmarked/undermarked
title changed to avoid wombles references
well most weeks it is one or two but this week I think the comparative marking was inconsistent under-marked - Katie, Kirsty, anita over-marked - peter, jeremy, jamelia |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Under The Ivy
Posts: 16,586
|
Under - Anita and Kellie
Over - Jamelia and Jay |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
|
Undermarked - Anita, AGAIN.
Overmarked - Jay and Jeremy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 245
|
undermarked - Katie
overmarked - Jeremy, Jamelia & Peter |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
I thought the marking was off all night long yet the leader board isn't bad.
Undermarked - Kellie, Carol (only because she got a score that suggests she fell over 5 times) Overmarked - Jeremy (did he get a "not the 5th guy" bonus?) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34,758
|
Highly undermarked - Anita
Highly overmarked - Helen (and I like Helen) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond, Surrey.
Posts: 13,814
|
Undermarked: Kellie. Anita.
Overmarked: Jamelia. Peter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 🇫🇷❤
Posts: 9,916
|
Under - Anita
Over - Peter and Jeremy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 61
|
Kelly UNDERMARKED
Peter OVERMARKED |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,624
|
under -- anita and Kellie
over jay and peter ---- peter never got lower then a 7 in any week - proves he was overmarked again and Jay , darcey scored him a 9 this week - now dont tell me that she thought that was equal to his jive !! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 56,112
|
Undermarked - Anita
Overmarked - Peter and Jeremy (even though I like him) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 3,078
|
I thought the marking was pretty fair this week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 31
|
Undermanned Anita,
Helen highly overmatched she had mistakes -favouritism |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Land of Glitter
Posts: 2,573
|
Undermarked - Katie [how can they justify such a crap score?], Anita [adored it], Georgia [dont think it should've been less than 9], Kirsty [I didn't think it was anywhere near as bad as the judges obviously did]
Overmarked - Jeremy [I like him but clearly something fishing going on with judges here], Jay [that was seriously dull/lifeless for me, and I usually love American Smooths] |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 713
|
Undermarked once again, Anita, and I am getting very annoyed about this.
Overmarked: Peter, Jamelia and Helen |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Twitterverse
Posts: 39,530
|
Undermarked - Anita (AGAIN)
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,237
|
Quote:
Undermarked - Katie [how can they justify such a crap score?], Anita [adored it], Georgia [dont think it should've been less than 9], Kirsty [I didn't think it was anywhere near as bad as the judges obviously did]
Overmarked - Jeremy [I like him but clearly something fishing going on with judges here], Jay [that was seriously dull/lifeless for me, and I usually love American Smooths] |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,120
|
Undermarked: Anita
Overmarked: Peter, Jeremy (much as I love him), Helen and Jamellia |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Land of Glitter
Posts: 2,573
|
Quote:
that would be my main thought
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 328
|
Quote:
title changed to avoid wombles references
well most weeks it is one or two but this week I think the comparative marking was inconsistent under-marked - Katie, Kirsty, anita over-marked - peter, jeremy, jamelia |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Huge fan of A1!!!
Posts: 4,137
|
Overmarked - Georgia and Peter
Undermarked - Jay and Anita |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 328
|
Quote:
Undermarked - Katie [how can they justify such a crap score?], Anita [adored it], Georgia [dont think it should've been less than 9], Kirsty [I didn't think it was anywhere near as bad as the judges obviously did]
Overmarked - Jeremy [I like him but clearly something fishing going on with judges here], Jay [that was seriously dull/lifeless for me, and I usually love American Smooths] Not that the producers would be desperate to get rid of a female tonight. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 328
|
Quote:
It is really making me consider the possibility of producers creating a storyline for her where she has a Latin "breakthrough". She's not great at Latin right now, that's a given, but her scores are shocking in comparison to some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: DOTS are evil!
Posts: 32,338
|
Thought marks were ok this week & leaderboard was pretty much as should be, just think Helen was overmarked but I liked the routine so I don't mind.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,100
|
Quote:
Katie and Kirsty had suspiciously low marks and Jeremy a suspiciously high mark.
Not that the producers would be desperate to get rid of a female tonight. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36.



