• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
overmarked/undermarked
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
marie67
31-10-2015
title changed to avoid wombles references

well most weeks it is one or two but this week I think the comparative marking was inconsistent

under-marked - Katie, Kirsty, anita

over-marked - peter, jeremy, jamelia
Littlegreen42
31-10-2015
Under - Anita and Kellie
Over - Jamelia and Jay
yellowlabbie
31-10-2015
Undermarked - Anita, AGAIN.
Overmarked - Jay and Jeremy.
csiaddict71
31-10-2015
undermarked - Katie

overmarked - Jeremy, Jamelia & Peter
davegold
31-10-2015
I thought the marking was off all night long yet the leader board isn't bad.

Undermarked - Kellie, Carol (only because she got a score that suggests she fell over 5 times)
Overmarked - Jeremy (did he get a "not the 5th guy" bonus?)
StigOfTheKrump
31-10-2015
Highly undermarked - Anita
Highly overmarked - Helen

(and I like Helen)
RichmondBlue
31-10-2015
Undermarked: Kellie. Anita.
Overmarked: Jamelia. Peter.
artlesschaos
31-10-2015
Under - Anita
Over - Peter and Jeremy.
Wigan Wanderer
31-10-2015
Kelly UNDERMARKED
Peter OVERMARKED
treetree
31-10-2015
under -- anita and Kellie

over jay and peter ---- peter never got lower then a 7 in any week - proves he was overmarked again

and Jay , darcey scored him a 9 this week - now dont tell me that she thought that was equal to his jive !!
Hound of Love
31-10-2015
Undermarked - Anita

Overmarked - Peter and Jeremy (even though I like him)
Bedlam_maid
31-10-2015
I thought the marking was pretty fair this week.
Becki boo
31-10-2015
Undermanned Anita,
Helen highly overmatched she had mistakes -favouritism
Nina_Blake
31-10-2015
Undermarked - Katie [how can they justify such a crap score?], Anita [adored it], Georgia [dont think it should've been less than 9], Kirsty [I didn't think it was anywhere near as bad as the judges obviously did]

Overmarked - Jeremy [I like him but clearly something fishing going on with judges here], Jay [that was seriously dull/lifeless for me, and I usually love American Smooths]
HopesandDreams
31-10-2015
Undermarked once again, Anita, and I am getting very annoyed about this.

Overmarked: Peter, Jamelia and Helen
Dilly 1
31-10-2015
Undermarked - Anita (AGAIN)
marie67
31-10-2015
Originally Posted by Nina_Blake:
“Undermarked - Katie [how can they justify such a crap score?], Anita [adored it], Georgia [dont think it should've been less than 9], Kirsty [I didn't think it was anywhere near as bad as the judges obviously did]

Overmarked - Jeremy [I like him but clearly something fishing going on with judges here], Jay [that was seriously dull/lifeless for me, and I usually love American Smooths]”

that would be my main thought
nyannie
31-10-2015
Undermarked: Anita

Overmarked: Peter, Jeremy (much as I love him), Helen and Jamellia
Nina_Blake
31-10-2015
Originally Posted by marie67:
“that would be my main thought”

It is really making me consider the possibility of producers creating a storyline for her where she has a Latin "breakthrough". She's not great at Latin right now, that's a given, but her scores are shocking in comparison to some.
BruciesChin
31-10-2015
Originally Posted by marie67:
“title changed to avoid wombles references

well most weeks it is one or two but this week I think the comparative marking was inconsistent

under-marked - Katie, Kirsty, anita

over-marked - peter, jeremy, jamelia”

Agree with this.
westlifefan123
31-10-2015
Overmarked - Georgia and Peter
Undermarked - Jay and Anita
BruciesChin
31-10-2015
Originally Posted by Nina_Blake:
“Undermarked - Katie [how can they justify such a crap score?], Anita [adored it], Georgia [dont think it should've been less than 9], Kirsty [I didn't think it was anywhere near as bad as the judges obviously did]

Overmarked - Jeremy [I like him but clearly something fishing going on with judges here], Jay [that was seriously dull/lifeless for me, and I usually love American Smooths]”

Katie and Kirsty had suspiciously low marks and Jeremy a suspiciously high mark.

Not that the producers would be desperate to get rid of a female tonight.
BruciesChin
31-10-2015
Originally Posted by Nina_Blake:
“It is really making me consider the possibility of producers creating a storyline for her where she has a Latin "breakthrough". She's not great at Latin right now, that's a given, but her scores are shocking in comparison to some.”

If that's the case, it's a crap storyline.
Alli-F
31-10-2015
Thought marks were ok this week & leaderboard was pretty much as should be, just think Helen was overmarked but I liked the routine so I don't mind.
yellowlabbie
31-10-2015
Originally Posted by BruciesChin:
“Katie and Kirsty had suspiciously low marks and Jeremy a suspiciously high mark.

Not that the producers would be desperate to get rid of a female tonight.”

Yes, it does make you think. I do like Jeremy but he was seriously overmarked tonight.
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map