• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
The next time Peter asks "can I just say",
<<
<
5 of 8
>>
>
RichmondBlue
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Monaogg:
“Is Kellie not the ringiest ringer evah with her dance teaching as well as training?”

Wouldn't the ringiest ringer be doing even better though, or do you think she is holding back ? Only marked the same as Peter Andre last night, which was a joke of course.
Daisy Bennyboots
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by billiesmith:
“Good post. The distaste for PA is understandable but his wife (and her career) should be off limits. I dont see anyone elses family getting slated on here and that is how it should be. Celebrities put themselves in the firing line their spouses dont - even when tbey appear as support!”

I have to disagree simply because his wife is also a celebrity - and while none of the other's partners are celebrities, Peter's wife can be found on the front cover of OK! regularly, flogging her kids, wedding etc to the highest bidder. It's ok to discuss her career to as he and she put it out there in the public domain as a selling point.

As for his dancing - it's lacklustre. I am always suspicious when people start fairly well yet don't improve one iota. It makes me wonder if they have been trained to death beforehand and then not pick up anything new in the weeks training ( mostly because they're off turning mas lights in shopping centres and recording covers albums for the xmas market instead of training). The judges are too kind in compliment and scoring but we all know why.

He doesn't listen to the judges or else he'd be improving. So that 'umble speech was for the public not the judges.

Nicname - how about: Uriah Pete.
warszawa
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“

Couldn't someone orchestrate the whole audience to groan in unison.”

Why stop there? The whole country should join in.
Monkseal
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Daisy Bennyboots:
“I have to disagree simply because his wife is also a celebrity - and while none of the other's partners are celebrities, Peter's wife can be found on the front cover of OK! regularly, flogging her kids, wedding etc to the highest bidder. It's ok to discuss her career to as he and she put it out there in the public domain as a selling point. ”

Sounds like an interesting photoshoot. Did Peter have a hood over his head and bondage gear on?
vald
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by warszawa:
“Why stop there? The whole country should join in.”

They do already.
j0anne
01-11-2015
CAN his managment have a clause that there people are always regarded in a good light and have final copy say on everything they give to the papers this IMO, is what us in background of SCD, I would get riders are including some of following

Later dance slots. (pimp spots)
Non harsh judge remarks (proven)
Higher wage for being on show
Music choices (he's had sine great songs bet that's a thing they wanted control over)
Favourable editing


Of course this is IMO however I bet there is plenty more
Maccadanny
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by aggs:
“In my 'umble opinion Claudia has been subtly trolling him since week one ”

I think he really annoyed her when he grabbed her for the kiss the other week. That is enough to traumatise even the most forgiving of people.
Blondie X
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“Sounds like an interesting photoshoot. Did Peter have a hood over his head and bondage gear on?”

And there goes breakfast
Lucy_James
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Daisy Bennyboots:
“I have to disagree simply because his wife is also a celebrity - and while none of the other's partners are celebrities, Peter's wife can be found on the front cover of OK! regularly, flogging her kids, wedding etc to the highest bidder. It's ok to discuss her career to as he and she put it out there in the public domain as a selling point.

As for his dancing - it's lacklustre. I am always suspicious when people start fairly well yet don't improve one iota. It makes me wonder if they have been trained to death beforehand and then not pick up anything new in the weeks training ( mostly because they're off turning mas lights in shopping centres and recording covers albums for the xmas market instead of training). The judges are too kind in compliment and scoring but we all know why.

He doesn't listen to the judges or else he'd be improving. So that 'umble speech was for the public not the judges.

Nicname - how about: Uriah Pete.”

His wife isn't a celeb, she married one. Bit bored of the attacks on emily both in showbiz and coming here to do it, leave it out for once. On topic p'duh was crap last night though you can see him looking for the camera all the time.
Hmmbop
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“His wife isn't a celeb, she married one. Bit bored of the attacks on emily both in showbiz and coming here to do it, leave it out for once. On topic p'duh was crap last night though you can see him looking for the camera all the time.”

Sorry, but If you're posing on the front page of naffest, tackiest mag in the country in a bikini while on 'holiday', sell your wedding pictures and pose with KP's children playing (whilst shielding your own daughter and allowing her the privacy she deserves) happy families for money, then that makes you a zeleb in my book. And her husband is never done going on about her being a doctor and how 'Bista' apparently now wants to be a doctor too. He loves peddling the whole doctor thing. Nothing wrong with being a zeleb if that's what floats your boat. And she very obviously and clearly loves it. She's always tagging along to the LW/TM studios when he's making an appearance. Imo it's pretty unrealistic and inaccurate to say she's merely the wife of a zeleb.
youngthing12
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Daisy Bennyboots:
“I have to disagree simply because his wife is also a celebrity - and while none of the other's partners are celebrities, Peter's wife can be found on the front cover of OK! regularly, flogging her kids, wedding etc to the highest bidder. It's ok to discuss her career to as he and she put it out there in the public domain as a selling point.

As for his dancing - it's lacklustre. I am always suspicious when people start fairly well yet don't improve one iota. It makes me wonder if they have been trained to death beforehand and then not pick up anything new in the weeks training ( mostly because they're off turning mas lights in shopping centres and recording covers albums for the xmas market instead of training). The judges are too kind in compliment and scoring but we all know why.

He doesn't listen to the judges or else he'd be improving. So that 'umble speech was for the public not the judges.

Nicname - how about: Uriah Pete.”

I second everything you just said 😀
And Uriah Pete Genious 😆
Blondie X
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by billiesmith:
“Good post. The distaste for PA is understandable but his wife (and her career) should be off limits. I dont see anyone elses family getting slated on here and that is how it should be. Celebrities put themselves in the firing line their spouses dont - even when tbey appear as support!”

I would normally agree but PP is happy to drag her into his publicity and attention seeking when it makes him look good. He made her public property by using her to flog his flagging career and so he's to blame.

If/when any of the other celebs families end up on about 57 OK front covers in their bikinis, with holly in their belly button or flog their wedding to the highest bigger, then they will quite rightly be commented on as well
Lucy_James
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Hmmbop:
“Sorry, but If you're posing on the front page of naffest, tackiest mag in the country in a bikini while on 'holiday', sell your wedding pictures and pose with KP's children playing happy families for money, then that makes you a zeleb in my book. And her husband is never done going on about her being a doctor and how 'Bista' apparently now wants to be a doctor too. Nothing wrong with being a zeleb if that's what floats your boat. And she very obviously and clearly loves it. She's always tagging along to the LW/TM studios when he's making an appearance. Imo it's pretty unrealistic and inaccurate to say she's merely the wife of a zeleb.”

But shes doing what loads of other wives off celebs do, but cos its p'duh (who im not a fan off by the way) she seems to get extra extra stick. I dont mind her, him i cant stand so i save my dislike for him.
primer
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by MarellaK:
“I don't like Peter Andre, I find him cringey and fake and I also perceive his treatment on the show as unfair but I don't think you should be bringing his wife into the discussion - and, anyway, how can she pretend to be a doctor?”

well, quite.
Everlong Girl
01-11-2015
When Peter Andre begins with his speech I cringe, he's just creeping. As he said he's never been scored lower than a 7 from any judge no matter how bland some of his performances are.

I can honestly say I can hardly remember any of his routines so far. Not had that wow factor or any real sort of impact.

Sorry Pete, I know you're a nice guy and all!!
Lucy_James
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“I would normally agree but PP is happy to drag her into his publicity and attention seeking when it makes him look good. He made her public property by using her to flog his flagging career and so he's to blame.

If/when any of the other celebs families end up on about 57 OK front covers in their bikinis, with holly in their belly button or flog their wedding to the highest bigger, then they will quite rightly be commented on as well”

so you would hate on kerry katonas husband and katie prices in the same way then? and numerous others because they do it as well?
Lucy_James
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by primer:
“well, quite.”

agree too "pretend doc" just makes the people attacking her look bitchy.
Hmmbop
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“so you would hate on kerry katonas husband and katie prices in the same way then? and numerous others because they do it as well?”


They've never claimed to be 'private'.
Blondie X
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“so you would hate on kerry katonas husband and katie prices in the same way then? and numerous others because they do it as well?”

Yes and I've had plenty to say about all of their husbands
aggs
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“so you would hate on kerry katonas husband and katie prices in the same way then? and numerous others because they do it as well?”

A - they've never claimed to be private.
B - they're not on Strictly.
Lucy_James
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Hmmbop:
“They've never claimed to be 'private'.”

Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“Yes...........”

fair enough cant say anything to that lol
youngthing12
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by nyannie:
“We actually put the mute button on while he was talking and went to clear up when he got his marks .

. I'm getting ready to complain to the BBC (although it won't do any good) about how Mr Andre is always given a spot towards the end of the competition, how he has been over marked and is allowed to go on and on about how great the judges comments are. He hasn't improved since Week 1 - the judges and both Claudia and Tess treat him with kid gloves. Talk about preferential treatment. . .”

Same here I also press mute or pause then fast forward it I don't listen to what the judges say either as if I do I go nuts at the TV 😡😡😡 Time the BBC told the judges they can critique him properly and give him proper scores in line with his dancing 🤔 Will it happen it would seem not 😁 So we will just have to put up with Uriah Pete 🙄
Lucy_James
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by aggs:
“A - they've never claimed to be private.
B - they're not on Strictly.”

a) yes
b) only because theyve not been asked if they had and were both would be front and centre in the audience and you know it.
aggs
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“a) yes
b) only because theyve not been asked if they had and were both would be front and centre in the audience and you know it.”

In which case I'd say exactly the same
Hmmbop
01-11-2015
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“fair enough cant say anything to that lol”


'Private' and 'Emily' in the same sentence doesn't really seem to fit. A bit like a 'sophisticated' wedding..... Featured in OK!

I'm sure she's on CAN's books and earns fees for her numerous OK! 'World exclusives'
<<
<
5 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map