Originally Posted by primer:
“we're obviously immersed in different cultural pools....
”
“we're obviously immersed in different cultural pools....
”
I happily admit to paddling round the shallow end
The next time Peter asks "can I just say",
7 of 8
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“I mean, I've managed to quuite happily know absolutely nothing about Peter Andre's life since about 2007, if not earlier. The first time I saw Dr Mrs Emily Andre ever was when she appeared in Pete's VT. I appreciate a good celebrity snark as much as the next man but people acting like it's a moral imperative to know what Dr Mrs Emily Andre wore on the front of Grazia Magazine November 2014 and why it means she's not a real doctor coz she put herself in the spotlight therefore it's our duty to rip her to bits because she sold Katie Price's kids into white slavery or whatever are frankly kidding themselves.”
“I mean, I've managed to quuite happily know absolutely nothing about Peter Andre's life since about 2007, if not earlier. The first time I saw Dr Mrs Emily Andre ever was when she appeared in Pete's VT. I appreciate a good celebrity snark as much as the next man but people acting like it's a moral imperative to know what Dr Mrs Emily Andre wore on the front of Grazia Magazine November 2014 and why it means she's not a real doctor coz she put herself in the spotlight therefore it's our duty to rip her to bits because she sold Katie Price's kids into white slavery or whatever are frankly kidding themselves.”
Katir price sold her kids way before anyone else got in on the act, dont like any of them for that bit, but the rest i agree.
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“His wife isn't a celeb, she married one. Bit bored of the attacks on emily both in showbiz and coming here to do it, leave it out for once. On topic p'duh was crap last night though you can see him looking for the camera all the time.”
“His wife isn't a celeb, she married one. Bit bored of the attacks on emily both in showbiz and coming here to do it, leave it out for once. On topic p'duh was crap last night though you can see him looking for the camera all the time.”
I was responding to a comment made by other forum members so perhaps your 'leave it out' should be addressed to them.
I'm a bit bored of people telling other people to leave the veteran OK! celebrity Emily Macdonagh alone just because she her degree is a medical one. She's done more OK! covers in the last few years than Katie Price ffs.
Originally Posted by aggs:
“I happily admit to paddling round the shallow end”
“I happily admit to paddling round the shallow end
”
as a strictly viewer i'm not exactly a cross channel swimmer myself, but there's shallow and then there's muddy puddles...
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“Katir price sold her kids way before anyone else got in on the act, dont like any of them for that bit, but the rest i agree.”
“Katir price sold her kids way before anyone else got in on the act, dont like any of them for that bit, but the rest i agree.”
People have been "selling their kids" (/allowing photographs to be taken of them in exchange for a fee) since long before Katie Price was born.
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“I mean, I've managed to quuite happily know absolutely nothing about Peter Andre's life since about 2007, if not earlier. The first time I saw Dr Mrs Emily Andre ever was when she appeared in Pete's VT. I appreciate a good celebrity snark as much as the next man but people acting like it's a moral imperative to know what Dr Mrs Emily Andre wore on the front of Grazia Magazine November 2014 and why it means she's not a real doctor coz she put herself in the spotlight therefore it's our duty to rip her to bits because she sold Katie Price's kids into white slavery or whatever are frankly kidding themselves.”
“I mean, I've managed to quuite happily know absolutely nothing about Peter Andre's life since about 2007, if not earlier. The first time I saw Dr Mrs Emily Andre ever was when she appeared in Pete's VT. I appreciate a good celebrity snark as much as the next man but people acting like it's a moral imperative to know what Dr Mrs Emily Andre wore on the front of Grazia Magazine November 2014 and why it means she's not a real doctor coz she put herself in the spotlight therefore it's our duty to rip her to bits because she sold Katie Price's kids into white slavery or whatever are frankly kidding themselves.”
My newsagent always has a stack of OK mags near the till they are trying to palm off on people for 50p along with the cheap chocolate. You don't have to buy the mag to get the jist. I blame them for many things, including my MerryTeaser addiction.
Originally Posted by Daisy Bennyboots:
“I was responding to a comment made by other forum members so perhaps your 'leave it out' should be addressed to them.
I'm a bit bored of people telling other people to leave the veteran OK! celebrity Emily Macdonagh alone just because she her degree is a medical one. She's done more OK! covers in the last few years than Katie Price ffs.”
“I was responding to a comment made by other forum members so perhaps your 'leave it out' should be addressed to them.
I'm a bit bored of people telling other people to leave the veteran OK! celebrity Emily Macdonagh alone just because she her degree is a medical one. She's done more OK! covers in the last few years than Katie Price ffs.”
Christ on a bike OK OK, carry on hating whatever gets you through the day love
ps: i am lauging at you comparing the number of covers though because imo thats a joke and just makes someone look bitter.
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“People have been "selling their kids" (/allowing photographs to be taken of them in exchange for a fee) since long before Katie Price was born.”
“People have been "selling their kids" (/allowing photographs to be taken of them in exchange for a fee) since long before Katie Price was born.”
and with respect to this conversation was the first of the three stooges, herself, p'duh and emily to do so which was my point, whats yours?
Originally Posted by tabithakitten:
“Firstly, I'd like to point out that I too hate (
) the modern linguistic invention "hate on". Good. Got that out of the way.
However, I think people use it (and I'm not judging them in any way for it) (I totally am) to imply that someone is jumping on a dislike bandwagon. They don't actually hate the person/group/item/concept described but more they have distaste for it and are expressing this more vehemently than necessary because they have the support of other "haters" around them.”
“Firstly, I'd like to point out that I too hate (
) the modern linguistic invention "hate on". Good. Got that out of the way.However, I think people use it (and I'm not judging them in any way for it) (I totally am) to imply that someone is jumping on a dislike bandwagon. They don't actually hate the person/group/item/concept described but more they have distaste for it and are expressing this more vehemently than necessary because they have the support of other "haters" around them.”
I think people use such expressions to get round the fact that DS tends to hand out bans for those continually using the word 'haters'. So it's a way of saying the same thing but not risking a ban - imo of course
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“I think people use such expressions to get round the fact that DS tends to hand out bans for those continually using the word 'haters'. So it's a way of saying the same thing but not risking a ban - imo of course”
“I think people use such expressions to get round the fact that DS tends to hand out bans for those continually using the word 'haters'. So it's a way of saying the same thing but not risking a ban - imo of course”
I didn't know that, thanks for that. I hereby retract all my "hating on" comments and apologise forthwitthers.
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“and with respect to this conversation was the first of the three stooges, herself, p'duh and emily to do so which was my point, whats yours?”
“and with respect to this conversation was the first of the three stooges, herself, p'duh and emily to do so which was my point, whats yours?”
Jesus wept...
(*removes self from thread*)
Originally Posted by Monkseal:
“Jesus wept...
(*removes self from thread*)”
“Jesus wept...
(*removes self from thread*)”
the convo is about them,not numerous other celebs so youre just deflecting about Katie but feel free im off for a roast myself in a bit
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“the convo is about them,not numerous other celebs so youre just deflecting about Katie but feel free im off for a roast myself in a bit”
“the convo is about them,not numerous other celebs so youre just deflecting about Katie but feel free im off for a roast myself in a bit
”
I hope you're referring to roast as in dinner and not in a premier league footballer 3some sort of way
Originally Posted by Lucy_James:
“the convo is about them,not numerous other celebs so youre just deflecting about Katie but feel free im off for a roast myself in a bit”
“the convo is about them,not numerous other celebs so youre just deflecting about Katie but feel free im off for a roast myself in a bit
”
Looks like you missed the point entirely.
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“I think people use such expressions to get round the fact that DS tends to hand out bans for those continually using the word 'haters'. So it's a way of saying the same thing but not risking a ban - imo of course”
“I think people use such expressions to get round the fact that DS tends to hand out bans for those continually using the word 'haters'. So it's a way of saying the same thing but not risking a ban - imo of course”
bizarre isn't it, that people can vent their spleen in depth and detail about someone that no-one is forced to know anything about.
Originally Posted by primer:
“bizarre isn't it, that people can vent their spleen in depth and detail about someone that no-one is forced to know anything about.”
“bizarre isn't it, that people can vent their spleen in depth and detail about someone that no-one is forced to know anything about.”
Not really as long as they talk about the subject matter and not other posters.
DS are very good at deleting comments and locking threads that they feel cross the line.
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“Not really as long as they talk about the subject matter and not other posters.”
“Not really as long as they talk about the subject matter and not other posters.”
i can talk about me though?
personally, i'd check myself into the priory if i hated anyone i knew that much, let alone anyone i didn't know...
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“I hope you're referring to roast as in dinner and not in a premier league footballer 3some sort of way”
“I hope you're referring to roast as in dinner and not in a premier league footballer 3some sort of way
”
My first thought too! Great [/filthy] minds
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“I hope you're referring to roast as in dinner and not in a premier league footballer 3some sort of way”
“I hope you're referring to roast as in dinner and not in a premier league footballer 3some sort of way
”
LOL No!
just pork and crackling although i suppose pork is a bit ...
Originally Posted by Monaogg:
“Looks like you missed the point entirely.”
“Looks like you missed the point entirely.
”
no I got it entirely, someone said about emily selling katies kids, I said katie sold them first youre just attempting to deflect from her and back on to p'duh and emily being to blame for the selling of the kids, all three are.
Perfect Peter's management must be seething when he keeps deviating from the script and saying his own stuff. He needs to be stopped. They must step in and stop all this b*llocks about his willingness to take criticism on board. One of the judges NEEDS to say that it's all very well Peter nodding and agreeing but he needs to actually IMPROVE. None of them have the balls to tell him that he has shown absolutely no improvement whatsoever. He needs to be in the bottom 2.
Another perfectly ok thread derailed with personal comments about a contestants family . I'd suggest taking all that nonsense elsewhere (although god knows where it would even be apt) since very few Strictly viewers give a stuff what his wife or ex wife does or didn't do .
Originally Posted by icequeen:
“Perfect Peter's management must be seething when he keeps deviating from the script and saying his own stuff. He needs to be stopped. They must step in and stop all this b*llocks about his willingness to take criticism on board. One of the judges NEEDS to say that it's all very well Peter nodding and agreeing but he needs to actually IMPROVE. None of them have the balls to tell him that he has shown absolutely no improvement whatsoever. He needs to be in the bottom 2.”
“Perfect Peter's management must be seething when he keeps deviating from the script and saying his own stuff. He needs to be stopped. They must step in and stop all this b*llocks about his willingness to take criticism on board. One of the judges NEEDS to say that it's all very well Peter nodding and agreeing but he needs to actually IMPROVE. None of them have the balls to tell him that he has shown absolutely no improvement whatsoever. He needs to be in the bottom 2.”
I agree. He makes all the right noises about taking their comments on board and then comes back the next week with another sub Jacko impression.
He doesn't seem to be getting it at all or else he's so fixed in his act that he just can't break out of it.
His partner needs to put electrodes onto him and every time he does a shamone move, she presses the button and gives him a shock
Originally Posted by Daisy Bennyboots:
“I have to disagree simply because his wife is also a celebrity - and while none of the other's partners are celebrities, Peter's wife can be found on the front cover of OK! regularly, flogging her kids, wedding etc to the highest bidder. It's ok to discuss her career to as he and she put it out there in the public domain as a selling point.
As for his dancing - it's lacklustre. I am always suspicious when people start fairly well yet don't improve one iota. It makes me wonder if they have been trained to death beforehand and then not pick up anything new in the weeks training ( mostly because they're off turning mas lights in shopping centres and recording covers albums for the xmas market instead of training). The judges are too kind in compliment and scoring but we all know why.
He doesn't listen to the judges or else he'd be improving. So that 'umble speech was for the public not the judges.
Nicname - how about: Uriah Pete.”
“I have to disagree simply because his wife is also a celebrity - and while none of the other's partners are celebrities, Peter's wife can be found on the front cover of OK! regularly, flogging her kids, wedding etc to the highest bidder. It's ok to discuss her career to as he and she put it out there in the public domain as a selling point.
As for his dancing - it's lacklustre. I am always suspicious when people start fairly well yet don't improve one iota. It makes me wonder if they have been trained to death beforehand and then not pick up anything new in the weeks training ( mostly because they're off turning mas lights in shopping centres and recording covers albums for the xmas market instead of training). The judges are too kind in compliment and scoring but we all know why.
He doesn't listen to the judges or else he'd be improving. So that 'umble speech was for the public not the judges.
Nicname - how about: Uriah Pete.
”
Well said
Originally Posted by primer:
“lets face it, if they found a cure for cancer between them, some of you would still hate them and claim they only did it to throw themselves into the spotlight...”
“lets face it, if they found a cure for cancer between them, some of you would still hate them and claim they only did it to throw themselves into the spotlight...
”
I promise you, if pa finds a cure for cancer I will pay money to personally congratulate him. However, it's very unlikely that he will when he barely managed to raise 10 grand for his own charity-turned-fund he set up to honour the memory of his brother (but in his own name, cos, you know).
And, in spite of knowing what a proven liar, proven sneak, proven bully he is, some people will always defend him and his snivelling ways.
Go figure, huh?
Can I just say, Peter, that I have rarely heard anyone so insincere on TV since David Cameron said there'd be no cuts to tax-credits.
Can I just also point out, Peter my dear, that you should be a bit careful because, if you poke your nose any further up Len's posterior, you may just never manage to extract it.
Can I just also point out, Peter my dear, that you should be a bit careful because, if you poke your nose any further up Len's posterior, you may just never manage to extract it.
7 of 8
