Originally Posted by coppertop1:
“You know I rarely venture out of the NAT because of sense of deja vu seeing the same posters post the same thing every single week, and here we are yet again on a Friday with the same posters determined to imagine a relationship between a recently married woman and a younger man, given that it is the same posters who have been answered exactly the same way for weeks now, how about not responding anymore?
The fact that they choose to take strong exception to anyone suggesting that the rumours are as a result of a PR company tells me all I need to know about them.
The fact that it seems to them OK to try and undermine someone's marriage rather than actually countenance the fact that a man and woman can actually have a non sexual relationship is something I fail to understand.
Monkseal I don't care whether it is someone's fans or a PR company that is likely to be behind it but I find the whole thing sleazy and really I am only commenting now because the circular nature of these arguments surely has to stop sometime.
How about perhaps we could have 24 hours a week without sleaze?”
Re paragraph 2. I posted commenting on the post you mentioned. I commented because it was a post concerning on 'those' rumours that took the opportunity to make a suggestion regarding another contestant ( or their pr). It just isn't necessary to attack another celeb while defending another. What that tells you about me I do not know.
I think Ann Dancer in her post summed it up perfectly (sorry can't quote again, posting is hard enough at the moment). And, for the record, I like Jay, he's not my favourite but I have nothing against him and wouldnt mind if he won.