• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Cult, Sci-Fi & Fantasy
New Star Trek Series Coming in January 2017
<<
<
17 of 46
>>
>
Flash525
20-07-2016
Originally Posted by RebelScum:
“Personally I'm not bothered which timeline it's set in. Even if it's set on the original timeline it's still going to be new and shiny, it may not be as fast paced and flashy as the films (the tv shows never have been) but will have a modern feel to it. Anyone expecting 90's style Trek is probably going to be disappointed.”

My only reason for wanting a new timeline, is to save it from ruining existing continuity anymore than they already have. With a new timeline, they have a fresh canvas. If they use an existing timeline, then events from the past will have meaning, and the events of the future will still have to happen.

Originally Posted by Ulsterguy:
“I find it worrying that there's no indication of casting yet.”

Considering it's due out early next year, I too am concerned by this. It may be that they've already chosen everyone and that they're keeping it under wraps, but it doesn't exactly inspire confidence when we know so little.
codename_47
20-07-2016
Originally Posted by Flash525:
“My only reason for wanting a new timeline, is to save it from ruining existing continuity anymore than they already have. With a new timeline, they have a fresh canvas. If they use an existing timeline, then events from the past will have meaning, and the events of the future will still have to happen.

Considering it's due out early next year, I too am concerned by this. It may be that they've already chosen everyone and that they're keeping it under wraps, but it doesn't exactly inspire confidence when we know so little.”

I know for a fact from a surprising family source that they have cast the roles, they're just keeping it on the down low

Due to NDA's and such I don't want to say too more, but roles have been cast don't worry about that.
Flash525
20-07-2016
Originally Posted by codename_47:
“I know for a fact from a surprising family source that they have cast the roles, they're just keeping it on the down low

Due to NDA's and such I don't want to say too more, but roles have been cast don't worry about that.”

That's comforting. Can you at least tell us whether we'll approve of the casting choices? Do the cast chosen fit into that Trek role?
MrSuper
20-07-2016
Originally Posted by codename_47:
“I know for a fact from a surprising family source that they have cast the roles, they're just keeping it on the down low

Due to NDA's and such I don't want to say too more, but roles have been cast don't worry about that.”

The lead actor of the show, is it a well known name? Someone we'll all recognise? A/B/C list name recognition? American?

Are the majority of the cast actors we'll all know or are there some unknowns in the mix?

You don't have to name names but you should be able to answer this at least imo.
carl.waring
20-07-2016
Originally Posted by James_Picard:
“I hope you're right but out of curiosity why are you "certain" it will be brilliant.”

Because I trust the creative team behind it.

Originally Posted by Thrombin:
“http://www.dictionary.com/browse/original


original
[uh-rij-uh-nl]
.
adjective
.
5. created, undertaken, or presented for the first time:



It is being presented for the first time (in that region). Therefore, it is an original.”

Fair point I guess but not how most people will interpret it especially given that there are some actual original (ie made for an by Netflix) shows on there.

Originally Posted by codename_47:
“I know for a fact from a surprising family source that they have cast the roles, they're just keeping it on the down low.

Due to NDA's and such I don't want to say too more, but roles have been cast don't worry about that.”

Of course you can't actually prove any of this; but that's not my point. I think we can safely assume that, given we're less than six months from "broadcast" they almost certainly will have cast it by now anyway
blueisthecolour
20-07-2016
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“A couple of times up thread it has been said that we know the show is set in the original TV series time line. Not the movie one where history was changed.

I agree this makes sense to keep the shows separate etc.

But do we know this for sure?

As far as I saw the story claiming that included it being set between the Original Series and The Next Generation and even that it was an anthology.

Those were all denied by those involved as a groundless rumour and stated that there would be one 13 episode story arc.

Given this I was not sure if the TV series or movie time line was true or false based on those denials.

I would have imagined they would want to keep separate from the movies so that stories do not become interdependent given their separate productions. Plus the classic TV series and a close enough period to the past TV shows to allow the occasional guest appearance would obviously help them attract fans.

But can anyone link to the source of the confidence that the show is not set in the movie universe?”

I posted a few pages back that Total Film had an article where they stated that the new Star Trek series would be in the SAME universe as the new films. We are all assuming though that it was just a bit of unresearched, shoddy journalism.
Bio Max
21-07-2016
Just caught up on the news that this is exclusive to Netflix - gutted! (I'm on nowtv and amazon)

I will look forward to it on blu ray instead
blueisthecolour
21-07-2016
Originally Posted by Bio Max:
“Just caught up on the news that this is exclusive to Netflix - gutted! (I'm on nowtv and amazon)

I will look forward to it on blu ray instead ”

You could probably get 6 months of Netflix subscription for the price of the blu ray
GDK
21-07-2016
Originally Posted by blueisthecolour:
“You could probably get 6 months of Netflix subscription for the price of the blu ray ”

Well, not exactly...

Monthly Netflix HD subscription currently = £7.49 x 6 months = £44.94

[Edit}
Typical Blu Ray disc box set (on release) ~ £35-£45 (probably £60 for Star Trek )

A single blu ray at £15 is actually around 2 month's Netflix subscription, but you're right a boxed set would work out at around 6 months.
[End Edit]

And when Netflix eventually remove your favourite movie from their catalogue, then what do you do?

I'm a fan of Netflix and others to catch some of the latest stuff and some really good TV series, but when I want a copy to keep, physical media. Every time.

If I didn't already subscribe to Netflix, I'd wait for the whole season/series to be available and binge watch the lot within a month. That way you would only have to pay for one month (or get it free if you are able to sign up for the 30 day free trial).
Duncan_Styles
21-07-2016
I think a TV series box set is usually more than £15.
GDK
21-07-2016
Originally Posted by Duncan_Styles:
“I think a TV series box set is usually more than £15.”

A season box set? Yes true. More like £35 to £45 (more if it's Star Trek ). I was comparing (wrongly) to a movie release. Now edited to correct.
Jaycee Dove
21-07-2016
Originally Posted by codename_47:
“I know for a fact from a surprising family source that they have cast the roles, they're just keeping it on the down low

Due to NDA's and such I don't want to say too more, but roles have been cast don't worry about that.”

Any idea if the rumours I have seen are true about casting a trans actor/character. Something Star Trek is only about 30 years behind on getting on board with. So fairly predictable that it might try to embrace something it probably couldn't even with TNG in the 80s.
Chickens hit
23-07-2016
First peek at the new ship (and title)

http://screencrush.com/cbs-star-trek...fuller-teaser/
Motthus
24-07-2016
So it's Star Trek Discovery and the teaser is online to view!
Corwin
24-07-2016
Bit of a different design for the ship.

To me it doesn't look as futuristic as the Enterprise D so it may well be set before Next Gen.
Corwin
24-07-2016
Originally Posted by Corwin:
“Bit of a different design for the ship.
”

My first thought was that it looked like a cross between a Federation ship and a Klingon ship and looking elsewhere I see I wasn't the only one to think that.


mmmn, seems the design is very similar to drawings/models of the proposed Enterprise in the unmade film Planet of the Titans.

The models in question were actually used in an Next Gen episode.
Corwin
24-07-2016
Originally Posted by Jaycee Dove:
“A couple of times up thread it has been said that we know the show is set in the original TV series time line. Not the movie one where history was changed.

I agree this makes sense to keep the shows separate etc.

But do we know this for sure?
”

Yes, we do now. Confirmed by Fuller at Comic Con
Fizzbin
24-07-2016
Originally Posted by Corwin:
“My first thought was that it looked like a cross between a Federation ship and a Klingon ship and looking elsewhere I see I wasn't the only one to think that.


mmmn, seems the design is very similar to drawings/models of the proposed Enterprise in the unmade film Planet of the Titans.

The models in question were actually used in an Next Gen episode.”

It reminded me of that design too, more here - http://losttrek.weebly.com/ralph-mcq...ncept-art.html
little-monster
24-07-2016
Nice to have a title instead of just saying "New Star Trek Series"
Fizzbin
24-07-2016
I just hope people don't get confused & think it's going to be on the Discovery Channel.
little-monster
24-07-2016
Originally Posted by Fizzbin:
“I just hope people don't get confused & think it's going to be on the Discovery Channel.”

Haha. True
Fizzbin
24-07-2016
Oh dear, just realised, we've had - TOS, then TAS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT

Now we've got STD.
performingmonk
24-07-2016
Originally Posted by Fizzbin:
“Oh dear, just realised, we've had - TOS, then TAS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT

Now we've got STD. ”

They're much more likely to use DIS.
Corwin
24-07-2016
Originally Posted by performingmonk:
“They're much more likely to use DIS. ”

DSC is what I believe they are going with.
Ulsterguy
24-07-2016
With a hull registration of NCC 1031, does that ship predate the original series Enterprise?
<<
<
17 of 46
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map