Originally Posted by LudwigVonDrake:
“^Interesting point. Most fans deride it, and then there are others that call it a flop due to its reputation, but I wonder - how much did it being on the UPN play in its demise?
True, the same result could have occured if it'd been on CBS (as an example). And it did come at a point of over saturation, but after taking those into account, I wonder, could it have had a full/traditional Trek 7 year run?
OK, tech and viewing habits are changing, but I wonder if this issue could be relevent to the new show?”
I suspect it would have done better if it had aired on a bigger network, and they'd not tried to use it to launch a 4th network, which eventually collapsed.
It's possible they're making the same mistake in the US, trying to use it to drive up subscriptions to CBS All Access. CBS All Access is a late player into the market for streaming TV services and way behind Netflix, Amazon and others. In the rest of the world it'll be fine on Netflix, the best known streaming TV service and part of its drive to have quality content so its brand is seen as "the best".
Unfortunately, success in foreign parts may not be enough to secure the show's future in the event CBS All Access fails. Who knows whether Netflix (or anyone else) would want to pick up the show or whether CBS would consider selling its title?
As Sony knew when they bought film studios back catalogue to win the Blu Ray vs HDDVD format war, content is king. I can't see CBS All Access having enough good content to compete against the existing players in the long run.