Badly worded topic, I know, but I happened to see Rose (i.e episode 1) and couldn't help but feel that it was perhaps more akin to the old, pre-revival days of the show than it is to what we have now. In tone, production values, quality of acting in some places (good old Noel Clarke still visibly finding his feet), story simplicity, picture quality and even a lot of the score.
Of course it was a decade ago and standards have improved across TV in general since then, so a sizeable difference is to be expected. I just found it interesting, given that it was touted at the time as being so superior to Classic Who in most of those areas, to now see it as so dated. Not that it has lost any charm at all, mind you.
Anyone else gone back to the earliest days of the show and found themselves thinking along those lines?
Of course it was a decade ago and standards have improved across TV in general since then, so a sizeable difference is to be expected. I just found it interesting, given that it was touted at the time as being so superior to Classic Who in most of those areas, to now see it as so dated. Not that it has lost any charm at all, mind you.
Anyone else gone back to the earliest days of the show and found themselves thinking along those lines?