Originally Posted by Tommo781:
“Totally correct. But as a non dancer, all I can judge on is whether I like a particular dance or not. I can tell if it is messed up, but not if the technical content is right or sufficient. I wouldn't notice a heel lead, or know if it is in fact a requirement of a particular dance. So I can enjoy a technically poor dance, and be bored by an expertly executed dance. I found the K&K waltz last night very boring to watch, even though it may have been step perfect for all I know. The GBP may well vote for their favourite personalities, or favourite dances on the night. The unexciting waltz may have been the reason Kellie didn't get the public votes.”
“Totally correct. But as a non dancer, all I can judge on is whether I like a particular dance or not. I can tell if it is messed up, but not if the technical content is right or sufficient. I wouldn't notice a heel lead, or know if it is in fact a requirement of a particular dance. So I can enjoy a technically poor dance, and be bored by an expertly executed dance. I found the K&K waltz last night very boring to watch, even though it may have been step perfect for all I know. The GBP may well vote for their favourite personalities, or favourite dances on the night. The unexciting waltz may have been the reason Kellie didn't get the public votes.”
It happened with Kimberley, who finished second, and Caroline, who won, so clearly dancing a Waltz and being in the dance off has no correlation to you actually being a good dancer or not, it's just not as exciting as a Tango or a Salsa...





(no harm that he experienced that as it make him appreciate what the other pros have to go through). 