DS Forums

 
 

Shock as pregnant woman performed oral sex on husband in Westfield


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2015, 10:26
jediknight2k1
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ban Hammer Club.
Posts: 6,757

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/617...hopping-Centre

Akeela Ali, 25, was caught on camera engaging in sexual activity with her husband Fahad Bilal, 26, in Westfield Shopping Centre in Shepherd's Bush, west London.

The footage, which lasted 10 minutes, showed Ali "moving her head up and down" before going on to spit into a tissue and discarding it into a flower pot, a court was told.

She also placed her right hand under Bilal's jacket "and appeared to be masturbating him" during the inappropriate encounter.

The couple's two children, ages three and five, were seen on the footage running around the shopping centre and interrupting the couple "several times" while in the act.

Ali and Bilal have now been barred from London for eight weeks after pleading guilty to outraging public decency at Hammersmith magistrates' court - with the children in tow.

The couple said they had "thought about stopping" when their kids caught them but decided to carry on, late explaining: "It just happened."
Her hormones are making her "feel horny" and she didn't realise what she was going.

Just as well the judge banned them for 8 weeks.
jediknight2k1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 07-11-2015, 10:29
MAW
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,522
Well, Muslim chav couple integrates into British society. Is that a win?
MAW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:32
Sport1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,048
OP posts it because they are muslims. He would have ignored it otherwise.
Sport1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:35
Lushness
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 24,665
My god the comments on that page
Lushness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:45
JasonWatkins
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 53,623
OP posts it because they are muslims. He would have ignored it otherwise.
Perhaps there's a Google alert for any muslim-y sounding names doing something non-muslim-y
JasonWatkins is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:45
MargMck
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
OP posts it because they are muslims. He would have ignored it otherwise.
I'm sure someone else would have posted it if OP hadn't, it's right up DS's street... or shopping centre.
MargMck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:46
MAW
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,522
My god the comments on that page
Though I had to laugh at the bloke who thinks spitting shouldn't be allowed

Though the moderation, or lack of it there makes you realise that maybe the somewhat sanitising moderation here is the lesser of two evils.
MAW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:49
Namira
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,156
My god the comments on that page
What they did was pretty revolting but it's not like no native Brits have ever done anything disgusting in public.
Namira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:53
MinaH
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,055
This story would have been picked up by the media no matter what the religion or claimed religion of the adherents. If anything it is likely NOT to be reported in certain media outlets because of the particular religious affiliation of the adherents.

It went to court, there was CTV evidence, it was in a public place, children were involved, and the sentence is a barring from London.

The sentence seems to be a bit strange - barred from London? How is that going to be policed?

PS The OP doesn't mention the couple were Muslims yet most of the comments, reading between the lines, are focusing on how the reporting of this story could be islamophobic.
MinaH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:54
muggins14
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,126
Though I had to laugh at the bloke who thinks spitting shouldn't be allowed

Though the moderation, or lack of it there makes you realise that maybe the somewhat sanitising moderation here is the lesser of two evils.
Yes, that was funny, although - after reading the nasty comments I do feel I need to wash my eyeballs in white vinegar!
muggins14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:55
Mirror Mirror
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: South East
Posts: 405
I do think their behaviour was disgusting and makes them look more like feral animals than humans but I agree with those who say the poster wouldn't be interested if they weren't Muslims. I also despair at the comments on the Express. I could only read a few as they were so awful,
Mirror Mirror is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 10:59
James Frederick
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 36,990
I do think their behaviour was disgusting and makes them look more like feral animals than humans but I agree with those who say the poster wouldn't be interested if they weren't Muslims. I also despair at the comments on the Express. I could only read a few as they were so awful,
If it wasn't Muslims doing it but saw and reported the act the OP would be going on about how they are to prudish thanks to their religion.
James Frederick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:07
JasonWatkins
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 53,623
Without wishing to be pedantic, the article suggests she was giving him a handy rather than a blozzer ..
JasonWatkins is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:27
Namira
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,156
Without wishing to be pedantic, the article suggests she was giving him a handy rather than a blozzer ..
It says her head was moving up and down and she spat into a tissue.
Namira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:28
Blondie X
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,524
This story would have been picked up by the media no matter what the religion or claimed religion of the adherents. If anything it is likely NOT to be reported in certain media outlets because of the particular religious affiliation of the adherents.

It went to court, there was CTV evidence, it was in a public place, children were involved, and the sentence is a barring from London.

The sentence seems to be a bit strange - barred from London? How is that going to be policed?

PS The OP doesn't mention the couple were Muslims yet most of the comments, reading between the lines, are focusing on how the reporting of this story could be islamophobic.
I agree. I'm sure if Sharon and Darren had got down to it in Lakeside Primark with little Chardonnay and Lambrini climbing the mannequins whils they waited for daddy to finish, it will still have made the tabloids with the DM letting us know they were on benefits, live in a council house etc. It's a story made in redtop heaven, regardless of the participants.

The fact they're banned from London appears a strange punishment. So they're free to continue with foreplay in regional shopping centres until Christmas
Blondie X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:30
vauxhall1964
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,800
how many lashes is this worth under Sharia?
vauxhall1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:36
jediknight2k1
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ban Hammer Club.
Posts: 6,757
I'm sure someone else would have posted it if OP hadn't, it's right up DS's street... or shopping centre.
It's usually the type of "JasonWatkins" thread.

Like posting a thread about a couple who had a sex on a beach a few week ago
jediknight2k1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:44
muggins14
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,126
I agree. I'm sure if Sharon and Darren had got down to it in Lakeside Primark with little Chardonnay and Lambrini climbing the mannequins whils they waited for daddy to finish, it will still have made the tabloids with the DM letting us know they were on benefits, live in a council house etc. It's a story made in redtop heaven, regardless of the participants.

The fact they're banned from London appears a strange punishment. So they're free to continue with foreplay in regional shopping centres until Christmas
I'll be on the lookout in Southgate Bath next time I'm there Will there be a regional tour I wonder?
muggins14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:45
tealady
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: colchester
Posts: 15,350
My god the comments on that page
"CHUCK THEM OUT OF BRITAIN
HOW CAN THEY AFFORD FAIRS TO LONDON BUT NOT THE COURT FINES"
Hmm, I guess the poster's best subject at school wasn't English.
tealady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:49
BanglaRoad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Stirling/Windsor/Overseas
Posts: 14,329
The agenda of the OP is becoming fairly desperate.
BanglaRoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:50
MargMck
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
It's usually the type of "JasonWatkins" thread.

Like posting a thread about a couple who had a sex on a beach a few week ago
I think those simply decrying you for making it into a thread are just annoyed that Muslims have done something so chavvy. See, I'd like to know more about them, as this immodest behaviour is a bit of a surprise; and as he has to come back to London for immigration meetings it appears at least one of them hasn't been here long enough to be debauched by British society.
MargMck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:54
Hobbit Feet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mole Bothering
Posts: 13,938
I can't see the part that says that either or both of them were not born in the UK

I'm wondering where all those lovely Express folks commenting think they should be 'sent back to'

it makes me ashamed just reading them
Hobbit Feet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:56
jediknight2k1
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ban Hammer Club.
Posts: 6,757
The agenda of the OP is becoming fairly desperate.
As is your breaking of forum rules by baiting and going off-topic.

Disruption: Unconstructive, off-topic and pointless posts
Unconstructive posts are posts that contribute nothing to a thread. This includes:
- Posting "I've sent you a message!" or "Check your PMs!". The forum software will inform the person they have a message. The rest of the forum doesn't need to know about it.
- Commenting on spelling/grammar: we ask that users make the effort to communicate clearly and, so long as posts are understandable, there should be no problem.
jediknight2k1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 11:57
Gnomsie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,252
"Speaking from the dock, Ali said: "I'm just quite ashamed of what I did, I'm not happy with what happened. At the time I didn't realise what I was doing, I was pregnant.""

Hazard of pregnancy. I regularly found myself giving the other half head, and had no idea what I was doing!
Gnomsie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2015, 12:02
MargMck
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
"Speaking from the dock, Ali said: "I'm just quite ashamed of what I did, I'm not happy with what happened. At the time I didn't realise what I was doing, I was pregnant.""

Hazard of pregnancy. I regularly found myself giving the other half head, and had no idea what I was doing!
Apparently they were tired, and it just happened. Most tired, pregnant women who'd travelled from Wales to London for the day are more likely to give him a slap, not a blow job.

Also for those who can't see where it says at least one of them is not a long term British resident:

She (judge) added to Bilal: 'I’m going to exclude you from coming within the M25 for eight weeks, except for the 11 and 12 of November, to attend your immigration hearing.
‘If you breach that you will be arrested and brought back to court.'
The unemployed couple must also pay a £60 victim surcharge and a £180 court charge at a rate of £10 a fortnight.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3qo3J3JEq
MargMck is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54.