|
||||||||
Shock as pregnant woman performed oral sex on husband in Westfield |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ban Hammer Club.
Posts: 6,757
|
Shock as pregnant woman performed oral sex on husband in Westfield
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/617...hopping-Centre Quote:
Akeela Ali, 25, was caught on camera engaging in sexual activity with her husband Fahad Bilal, 26, in Westfield Shopping Centre in Shepherd's Bush, west London. Her hormones are making her "feel horny" and she didn't realise what she was going.The footage, which lasted 10 minutes, showed Ali "moving her head up and down" before going on to spit into a tissue and discarding it into a flower pot, a court was told. She also placed her right hand under Bilal's jacket "and appeared to be masturbating him" during the inappropriate encounter. The couple's two children, ages three and five, were seen on the footage running around the shopping centre and interrupting the couple "several times" while in the act. Ali and Bilal have now been barred from London for eight weeks after pleading guilty to outraging public decency at Hammersmith magistrates' court - with the children in tow. The couple said they had "thought about stopping" when their kids caught them but decided to carry on, late explaining: "It just happened." Just as well the judge banned them for 8 weeks. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,522
|
Well, Muslim chav couple integrates into British society. Is that a win?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,048
|
OP posts it because they are muslims. He would have ignored it otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 24,665
|
My god the comments on that page
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 53,623
|
Quote:
OP posts it because they are muslims. He would have ignored it otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
|
Quote:
OP posts it because they are muslims. He would have ignored it otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 28,522
|
Quote:
My god the comments on that page
![]() ![]() Though the moderation, or lack of it there makes you realise that maybe the somewhat sanitising moderation here is the lesser of two evils. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,156
|
Quote:
My god the comments on that page
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,055
|
This story would have been picked up by the media no matter what the religion or claimed religion of the adherents. If anything it is likely NOT to be reported in certain media outlets because of the particular religious affiliation of the adherents.
It went to court, there was CTV evidence, it was in a public place, children were involved, and the sentence is a barring from London. The sentence seems to be a bit strange - barred from London? How is that going to be policed? PS The OP doesn't mention the couple were Muslims yet most of the comments, reading between the lines, are focusing on how the reporting of this story could be islamophobic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,126
|
Quote:
Though I had to laugh at the bloke who thinks spitting shouldn't be allowed
![]() Though the moderation, or lack of it there makes you realise that maybe the somewhat sanitising moderation here is the lesser of two evils. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: South East
Posts: 405
|
I do think their behaviour was disgusting and makes them look more like feral animals than humans but I agree with those who say the poster wouldn't be interested if they weren't Muslims. I also despair at the comments on the Express. I could only read a few as they were so awful,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 36,990
|
Quote:
I do think their behaviour was disgusting and makes them look more like feral animals than humans but I agree with those who say the poster wouldn't be interested if they weren't Muslims. I also despair at the comments on the Express. I could only read a few as they were so awful,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 53,623
|
Without wishing to be pedantic, the article suggests she was giving him a handy rather than a blozzer ..
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,156
|
Quote:
Without wishing to be pedantic, the article suggests she was giving him a handy rather than a blozzer ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,524
|
Quote:
This story would have been picked up by the media no matter what the religion or claimed religion of the adherents. If anything it is likely NOT to be reported in certain media outlets because of the particular religious affiliation of the adherents.
It went to court, there was CTV evidence, it was in a public place, children were involved, and the sentence is a barring from London. The sentence seems to be a bit strange - barred from London? How is that going to be policed? PS The OP doesn't mention the couple were Muslims yet most of the comments, reading between the lines, are focusing on how the reporting of this story could be islamophobic. The fact they're banned from London appears a strange punishment. So they're free to continue with foreplay in regional shopping centres until Christmas |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,800
|
how many lashes is this worth under Sharia?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ban Hammer Club.
Posts: 6,757
|
Quote:
I'm sure someone else would have posted it if OP hadn't, it's right up DS's street... or shopping centre.
Like posting a thread about a couple who had a sex on a beach a few week ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,126
|
Quote:
I agree. I'm sure if Sharon and Darren had got down to it in Lakeside Primark with little Chardonnay and Lambrini climbing the mannequins whils they waited for daddy to finish, it will still have made the tabloids with the DM letting us know they were on benefits, live in a council house etc. It's a story made in redtop heaven, regardless of the participants.
The fact they're banned from London appears a strange punishment. So they're free to continue with foreplay in regional shopping centres until Christmas Will there be a regional tour I wonder?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: colchester
Posts: 15,350
|
Quote:
My god the comments on that page
![]() HOW CAN THEY AFFORD FAIRS TO LONDON BUT NOT THE COURT FINES" Hmm, I guess the poster's best subject at school wasn't English. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Stirling/Windsor/Overseas
Posts: 14,329
|
The agenda of the OP is becoming fairly desperate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
|
Quote:
It's usually the type of "JasonWatkins" thread.
Like posting a thread about a couple who had a sex on a beach a few week ago ![]() have done something so chavvy. See, I'd like to know more about them, as this immodest behaviour is a bit of a surprise; and as he has to come back to London for immigration meetings it appears at least one of them hasn't been here long enough to be debauched by British society.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mole Bothering
Posts: 13,938
|
I can't see the part that says that either or both of them were not born in the UK
I'm wondering where all those lovely Express folks commenting think they should be 'sent back to' it makes me ashamed just reading them |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ban Hammer Club.
Posts: 6,757
|
Quote:
The agenda of the OP is becoming fairly desperate.
![]() Disruption: Unconstructive, off-topic and pointless posts Unconstructive posts are posts that contribute nothing to a thread. This includes: - Posting "I've sent you a message!" or "Check your PMs!". The forum software will inform the person they have a message. The rest of the forum doesn't need to know about it. - Commenting on spelling/grammar: we ask that users make the effort to communicate clearly and, so long as posts are understandable, there should be no problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,252
|
"Speaking from the dock, Ali said: "I'm just quite ashamed of what I did, I'm not happy with what happened. At the time I didn't realise what I was doing, I was pregnant.""
Hazard of pregnancy. I regularly found myself giving the other half head, and had no idea what I was doing! |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 17,632
|
Quote:
"Speaking from the dock, Ali said: "I'm just quite ashamed of what I did, I'm not happy with what happened. At the time I didn't realise what I was doing, I was pregnant.""
Hazard of pregnancy. I regularly found myself giving the other half head, and had no idea what I was doing! Also for those who can't see where it says at least one of them is not a long term British resident: She (judge) added to Bilal: 'I’m going to exclude you from coming within the M25 for eight weeks, except for the 11 and 12 of November, to attend your immigration hearing. ‘If you breach that you will be arrested and brought back to court.' The unemployed couple must also pay a £60 victim surcharge and a £180 court charge at a rate of £10 a fortnight. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3qo3J3JEq |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13.





Will there be a regional tour I wonder?
have done something so chavvy. See, I'd like to know more about them, as this immodest behaviour is a bit of a surprise; and as he has to come back to London for immigration meetings it appears at least one of them hasn't been here long enough to be debauched by British society.