There was no mention of islam or muslims in either the OP's comments or the C&P newspaper quote.

It's getting ridiculous now, when any story at all that has a negative tone about a muslim, is automatically seen by some as being 'islamophobic'

It's about time a new word was invented for those who blindly accuse others of islamophobia, regardless of the situation or context - how about islamophobiarrhea?

I agree. The fact they were Muslim didn't enter my head at all until the people accusing the op of islamaphobia brought it up.

It appears that the subject of the article has now been deflected.

It's absolute nonsense to say this wouldn't have been discussed if they weren't Muslim either. This type of story is a DS staple regardless of who the disgusting couple were.

He'd love us all to say 'filthy Muslims' or, in this case, 'Islamic man forces wife to carry out obscene act'. I'm trying to apologise for appearing to pander to his known proclivities, but still happen to think that's the most likely thing here. Apart from the fact that he's just your average bastard, and I doubt that being Muslim has got much to do with that.

I have the OP on ignore but as soon as I saw who posted it I knew Muslims would be involved in the story somewhere.

Why the focus on the Muslim angle? Do you not look at what happened in a shopping centre in front of children and not feel disgusted. Or is the fact that they happen to be Muslim exempt them from being disgusting human beings who at the very least are willfully inappropriate

Perhaps so but there others in this thread and similar whose knee jerk responses are in no way more insightful. I also note it wasn't the OP who brought Muslims into this although presumably they found the story during their relentless trawling for such tails.

I think they got off to lightly and should be locked up I think the same for any public sex acts or nudity.

guess she likes pork after all

I suspect, but accept I may be wrong, that those commentators that say the pregnant woman with her young children in attendance, voluntarily pleasured her man in the shopping centre, because she was horny and wanted to release her horniness there and then, are in fact men, and possibly young lads (at least in their heads).

We know which one she is then

I know nothing about the OP's agenda but do you feel this should not have been posted on DS ? if not why not ?

Cheers for opening up the "bait" angle of this thread Hobbit Feet, it has provoked and enhanced this debate further You are a true democractic soul who gives meaning and depth to the very concept of freedom of speech...

Yep... the OP is baiting again and getting results.

they're banned from LONDON???
rather extreme ..... umm .....

The sad thing about all the above bickering is this women may well have been victim of an assault but very few have dared to discuss that possibility.

Do you mean her husband forced her to give him oral sex and masturbate him in a shopping centre whilst the kids ran around and she seemed perfectly happy having started by kissing him and moving on to oral sex , all seen on CCTV ?

Yes exactly. I think the same. Im just wondering why the focus was on the op

Let he who is without agenda cast the first stone

There's not a lick of evidence to suggest that. Tends to limit the discussion, although one or two haven't let that stop them, yourself included.

eta: pun not intended but I'll leave it anyway

Ummm not sure what I've done to rattle your cage - I responded to the OP making comments about 'bait' and pointed out that it cuts both ways, I certainly didn't raise it.

I thought it odd that Express readers need a map to show them where Newport is.... then I read the comments and realised they couldn't find their own **** with both hands and a pack of hunting dogs.

I would, you seem quite pleased with it.

I agree, there appears to have been no coercion whatsoever.

Being banned from London seems a bit of an odd one.

I wonder how that would be enforced, particularly if the wife was fully burkared up?

Of course it can still be coerced, if you think coercion would be obvious on CCTV then you don't understand how abusive relationships work.

No I was sincerly joining in with your right to point out the OP is baiting and you have every right to discuss it... as oposed to accusing you of trying to shut down debate, which you haven't done Totally with you

Baiting is against the forums rules and often results in e-mail from a DS moderator.

There's plenty of other random threads, like sex on the beach, arrested for having wine, some random girl leaving Instagram.

Your reply is off=topic