• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • General Discussion
Shock as pregnant woman performed oral sex on husband in Westfield
<<
<
7 of 11
>>
>
Ivor Biggun
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by jzee:
“Of course she could but just because no violence or force was seen on CCTV doesn't mean it isn't an abusive relationship. He could have hit her previously when she refused to indulge one of his fantasies, this time she complied as she'd rather not get beaten up.”

Alternatively, she was as horny as hell and went for it.
It happens believe it or not, women do get horny.
blueblade
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Doing what they did in front of children is harmless?”

Yes, essentially.

The vast majority of small children would not have any clue what they were doing..

For those old enough to understand, it would probably be a source of amusement, soon forgotten and not causing any psychological damage.
Mirror Mirror
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“I think it's all kinds of f****d up tbh. Inappropriate seems too light a word to use.”

So do I, but apparently we're all supposed to be open minded to the point of absurdity, so clearly we're both pearl clutching puritans who should run for our smelling salts, or something.
sorcha_healy27
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“Yes, essentially.

The vast majority of small children would not have any clue what they were doing..

For those old enough to understand, it would probably be a source of amusement, soon forgotten and not causing any psychological damage.”

Next you'll be suggesting kids seeing porn isn't harmful
Mirror Mirror
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Next you'll be suggesting kids seeing porn isn't harmful”

Well of course it isn't! Random people on a forum have said so.
Karis
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“I think it's all kinds of f****d up tbh. Inappropriate seems too light a word to use.”

This is exactly it. It's enormously inappropriate, but it's not harmful.

And to the posts who've said children watching porn is harmful, I just shake my head.

Originally Posted by blueblade:
“For those old enough to understand, it would probably be a source of amusement, soon forgotten and not causing any psychological damage.”

Exactly. Why does everything have to be about outrage on here? Some posters, I swear, they aren't grounded in reality at all.
mounty
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by sutie:
“It's quite a stretch isn't it”

too right it was
bspace
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Next you'll be suggesting kids seeing porn isn't harmful”

Originally Posted by Mirror Mirror:
“Well of course it isn't! Random people on a forum have said so.”

Well if you care to point to any extensively researched evidence from a reputable body without an axe to grind.
St Dabeoc
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by blueblade:
“Yes, essentially.

The vast majority of small children would not have any clue what they were doing..

For those old enough to understand, it would probably be a source of amusement, soon forgotten and not causing any psychological damage.”

funny
blueblade
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Next you'll be suggesting kids seeing porn isn't harmful”

Perhaps you'd like to explain, though, what psychological damage witnessing this scene, would have caused to children - or anyone else for that matter?

Would you rather the above, or alternatively have your child witness violence or a terrible road accident, or someone taken desperately ill? Now that would stick in the mind forever.

Your call. . .
muggins14
08-11-2015
Originally Posted by Cissy Fairfax:
“Their punishment is to not go inside the M25 for eight weeks? ”

I know, crazy isn't it - it's more of a reward than a punishment
jclock66
08-11-2015
Bet that will go down well at the mosque.
pericom
08-11-2015
Doesn't seem that bad, I remember there was a case of a couple having sex in the lawn of Windsor castle.

The couple only got a caution... cos they weren't Muslim..
Alrightmate
08-11-2015
So they were 'caught on camera' and The Express made it public knowledge.

So whose fault is it if people are shocked and offended again?

If there was a secret camera hidden in my bathroom and filmed me using the toilet, I'm sure that many people would think it disgusting to see.
The solution? Perhaps the media shouldn't make it public knowledge and broadcast it to the world as 'news'.

Just because something is caught on camera it doesn't mean that the world needs to know about it. Perhaps with matters of sex people wouldn't be offended or shocked if the media respected the old fashioned notion of privacy.
Iqoniq
08-11-2015
If they don't get deported they'll be on the next series of CBB.
MinaH
08-11-2015
Originally Posted by Iqoniq:
“If they don't get deported they'll be on the next series of CBB.”

CBB ???
blueblade
08-11-2015
Originally Posted by MinaH:
“CBB ???”

Celebrity Big Brother (I think)
.Lauren.
08-11-2015
Bloody hell, is it really so hard (no pun intended) to believe that a woman, pregnant or otherwise, may actually be horny and enjoy giving her partner oral sex and may have instigated it?
Espresso
08-11-2015
If she was the horny one, why was it it her and not him who was administering oral sex?
Mirror Mirror
08-11-2015
People don't half like using accusastions of outrage to shut down debate.

This thread also seems to be a "look at how much more liberal than thou I am!" olympic sport.
blueblade
08-11-2015
Originally Posted by Espresso:
“If she was the horny one, why was it it her and not him who was administering oral sex?”

Maybe she gets off more on that than the other way round. Who knows.
James Frederick
08-11-2015
Originally Posted by .Lauren.:
“Bloody hell, is it really so hard (no pun intended) to believe that a woman, pregnant or otherwise, may actually be horny and enjoy giving her partner oral sex and may have instigated it?”

I agree but it's also not hard to believe that as the pregnant woman she took the fall as it would be less likley they would send her to prision.
.Lauren.
08-11-2015
Originally Posted by Espresso:
“If she was the horny one, why was it it her and not him who was administering oral sex?”

Maybe she didn't feel like any sort of act being performed on her? It's perfectly possible to be horny but only want to pleasure your partner on occasion. Maybe she really enjoys giving blowjobs, maybe it turns her on?

Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“I agree but it's also not hard to believe that as the pregnant woman she took the fall as it would be less likley they would send her to prision.”

That's true, I just find the assumption that she couldn't possibly have wanted to or instigated it rather odd.
MAW
08-11-2015
Originally Posted by .Lauren.:
“That's true, I just find the assumption that she couldn't possibly have wanted to or instigated it rather odd.”

As the person who initially mentioned the possibility that she didn't instigate it, I did not mean to suggest it was in any way impossible. She might have been incredibly excited by shopping at Westfield Its still highly unusual behaviour though, and I still think its quite possible she was 'persuaded'. I wouldnt go as far as describing it as assault, with nothing but a passing thought that it wasnt her idea.
sorcha_healy27
08-11-2015
Originally Posted by .Lauren.:
“Bloody hell, is it really so hard (no pun intended) to believe that a woman, pregnant or otherwise, may actually be horny and enjoy giving her partner oral sex and may have instigated it?”

That's certainly not the issue. Who the hell thinks it's normal to do this in a shopping centre?
<<
<
7 of 11
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map