Alternatively, she was as horny as hell and went for it.
It happens believe it or not, women do get horny.

Yes, essentially.

The vast majority of small children would not have any clue what they were doing..

For those old enough to understand, it would probably be a source of amusement, soon forgotten and not causing any psychological damage.

So do I, but apparently we're all supposed to be open minded to the point of absurdity, so clearly we're both pearl clutching puritans who should run for our smelling salts, or something.

Next you'll be suggesting kids seeing porn isn't harmful

Well of course it isn't! Random people on a forum have said so.

This is exactly it. It's enormously inappropriate, but it's not harmful.

And to the posts who've said children watching porn is harmful, I just shake my head.


Exactly. Why does everything have to be about outrage on here? Some posters, I swear, they aren't grounded in reality at all.

too right it was

Well if you care to point to any extensively researched evidence from a reputable body without an axe to grind.

funny

Perhaps you'd like to explain, though, what psychological damage witnessing this scene, would have caused to children - or anyone else for that matter?

Would you rather the above, or alternatively have your child witness violence or a terrible road accident, or someone taken desperately ill? Now that would stick in the mind forever.

Your call. . .

I know, crazy isn't it - it's more of a reward than a punishment

Bet that will go down well at the mosque.

Doesn't seem that bad, I remember there was a case of a couple having sex in the lawn of Windsor castle.

The couple only got a caution... cos they weren't Muslim..

So they were 'caught on camera' and The Express made it public knowledge.

So whose fault is it if people are shocked and offended again?

If there was a secret camera hidden in my bathroom and filmed me using the toilet, I'm sure that many people would think it disgusting to see.
The solution? Perhaps the media shouldn't make it public knowledge and broadcast it to the world as 'news'.

Just because something is caught on camera it doesn't mean that the world needs to know about it. Perhaps with matters of sex people wouldn't be offended or shocked if the media respected the old fashioned notion of privacy.

If they don't get deported they'll be on the next series of CBB.

CBB ???

Celebrity Big Brother (I think)

Bloody hell, is it really so hard (no pun intended) to believe that a woman, pregnant or otherwise, may actually be horny and enjoy giving her partner oral sex and may have instigated it?

If she was the horny one, why was it it her and not him who was administering oral sex?

People don't half like using accusastions of outrage to shut down debate.

This thread also seems to be a "look at how much more liberal than thou I am!" olympic sport.

Maybe she gets off more on that than the other way round. Who knows.

I agree but it's also not hard to believe that as the pregnant woman she took the fall as it would be less likley they would send her to prision.

Maybe she didn't feel like any sort of act being performed on her? It's perfectly possible to be horny but only want to pleasure your partner on occasion. Maybe she really enjoys giving blowjobs, maybe it turns her on?


That's true, I just find the assumption that she couldn't possibly have wanted to or instigated it rather odd.

As the person who initially mentioned the possibility that she didn't instigate it, I did not mean to suggest it was in any way impossible. She might have been incredibly excited by shopping at Westfield Its still highly unusual behaviour though, and I still think its quite possible she was 'persuaded'. I wouldnt go as far as describing it as assault, with nothing but a passing thought that it wasnt her idea.

That's certainly not the issue. Who the hell thinks it's normal to do this in a shopping centre?