DS Forums

 
 

Many DS forum members r out of touch about what actually sells in the music industry


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2015, 10:49
sorcha_healy27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,940
The show has produced 1D, Leona Lewis, JLS, Olly Murs and Little Mix selling nearly 100m. That's the return. There's a few classic pop singles in that and radio stations will probably still be playing 'Bleeding Love' and 'What Makes you Beautiful' 10 years from now. In the end that's not bad as an impact on pop music.
Commercially successful acts yes. Real music and musicians. No.
sorcha_healy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 08-11-2015, 11:02
Thiswillbefun
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,582
Commercially successful acts yes. Real music and musicians. No.
Total agreement with all your comments on this thread. The level of mass marketing & PR used to make One Direction, Little Mix etc "a thing" has been astounding. They would never have made it on musical talent alone.
We still have Little Mix songs being pumped out at every X Factor ad break to brainwash the hard of thinking into jumping on their bandwagon.
Thiswillbefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 11:07
MysteriousOz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,769
Your opinion as always OP 🤔🤔
MysteriousOz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 11:20
Thiswillbefun
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,582
The problem isn't that DS posters are out of touch, the problem is that many of us can see that the music industry has been transformed.

The industry used to be about creativity, about hearing something like Tubular Bells for the first time, about hearing lyrics that connected on a personal level.

Now the industry has been consumed by fake acts having formulaic tracks created on the cheap by a committee of men in grey suits. They then use their budgets to create brands & mass market the product at the low level proles who know no better and lap it up.

Even worse, the industry blocks real artists from getting any mass media exposure as not to reveal to the proles what real music actually sounds like.

And then these proles go on online forums to tell us that we're out of touch if we don't enjoy the dull repetitive thud of the latest "Now That's What I Call Accountancy Standards Volume 37".
Thiswillbefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 11:20
sorcha_healy27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,940
Total agreement with all your comments on this thread. The level of mass marketing & PR used to make One Direction, Little Mix etc "a thing" has been astounding. They would never have made it on musical talent alone.
We still have Little Mix songs being pumped out at every X Factor ad break to brainwash the hard of thinking into jumping on their bandwagon.
Thanks you!

I mean I wouldn't have an issue with this sort it stuff if they would stop pretending it was about music. It's not. The pretence is laughable. We have Louisa who never heard of one of the greatest bands and songwriters of all time saying the song could have been written for her.

I just find it so soulless and factory like. Churning out bland renditions and blander contestants.
sorcha_healy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 11:27
sgeandhu
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 968
It's the constant style over substance that really irks me.

Soulless rhythm and bass pap that's been done to death.

The crazy thing is that despite all the attention and money thrown at it the income generated from teenies/tweenies is still dwarfed by the over 35s. It's ludicrous how few sales are needed to get a single to no 1 in some weeks. The focus still seems to be singles where the money is really in albums or multi-buying of an artist's song book.
sgeandhu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 11:30
mimik1uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,750
It's the constant style over substance that really irks me.

Soulless rhythm and bass pap that's been done to death.

The crazy thing is that despite all the attention and money thrown at it the income generated from teenies/tweenies is still dwarfed by the over 35s. It's ludicrous how few sales are needed to get a single to no 1 in some weeks. The focus still seems to be singles where the money is really in albums or multi-buying of an artist's song book.
it was that point i made earlier in the thread that the blinkered focus on whats in the singles chart completely disregards the huge amount of success that happens via album sales from artists and bands
mimik1uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 11:30
mark e a
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,216
They go on about how it should just be the voice etc! That isn't the case anymore performance skills r just as important! Year in year out the acts which r usually most successful don't necessarily have the best voices but they have an individual image, can perform and sing to a reasonable to high standard! The two people who solely won on their voice was Leona Lewis and Sam Bailey
I think people need the voice and that "x factor". That's the point. They need to have both.

A good singer who performs and has charisma will most likely get more attention than an outstanding vocalist who just stands there belting out Whitney week after week.
mark e a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 12:09
scottie2121
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,314
It's all in the marketing in Cowell's world.

Take little mix pretty poor vocalists and no real talent. But invest millions and apply tons of polish through technology and then market them as a package using a range of media and bingo you have a group aso real as the Archies and the Wombles.

Then look at Cheryl Double-Barrelled and see how the same fairy dust was sprinkled of her. She's also a great example of the massive gulf between the product and the person.
scottie2121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 12:13
scottie2121
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,314
I think people need the voice and that "x factor". That's the point. They need to have both.

A good singer who performs and has charisma will most likely likely get more attention than an outstanding vocalist who just stands there belting out Whitney week after week.
Well the outstanding vocalist should realise that belting out stuff a la Houston is crappy, clichéd and gets a bunch of chavs giving a standing ovation on the orders of the floor manager.

The x factor is a great example of so much that's bad and soul destroying.
scottie2121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 12:24
Jennyloo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,183
In fairness the viewers are supposed to vote for their favourite act, not who is easiest for Simon Cowell to market.
Couldn't have said it better myself!
Jennyloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 12:26
Jennyloo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,183
Well the outstanding vocalist should realise that belting out stuff a la Houston is crappy, clichéd and gets a bunch of chavs giving a standing ovation on the orders of the floor manager.

The x factor is a great example of so much that's bad and soul destroying.
Once again a great point. Problem is what the buying public want and what the type of viewer who watches this show are is incompatible.
Jennyloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 12:32
Jennyloo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,183
The problem isn't that DS posters are out of touch, the problem is that many of us can see that the music industry has been transformed.

The industry used to be about creativity, about hearing something like Tubular Bells for the first time, about hearing lyrics that connected on a personal level.

Now the industry has been consumed by fake acts having formulaic traicks created on the cheap by a committee of men in grey suits. They then use their budgets to create brands & mass market the product at the low level proles who know no better and lap it up.

Even worse, the industry blocks real artists from getting any mass media exposure as not to reveal to the proles what real music actually sounds like.

And then these proles go on online forums to tell us that we're out of touch if we don't enjoy the dull repetitive thud of the latest "Now That's What I Call Accountancy Standards Volume 37".
Sad but true. It's on so many levels in society too, to get really serious. Talk about " you can fool some of the people, all of the time" etc. Who ever coined that phrase was a genius.
Just checked apparently it could have been Abraham Lincoln but it's not conclusive.
Jennyloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 12:43
Brekkie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cymru
Posts: 12,702
They go on about how it should just be the voice etc! That isn't the case anymore performance skills r just as important! Year in year out the acts which r usually most successful don't necessarily have the best voices but they have an individual image, can perform and sing to a reasonable to high standard! The two people who solely won on their voice was Leona Lewis and Sam Bailey
I think the problem is that the industry has changed so much over the last few years and the show hasn't always kept up with it. When Lady Gaga and Katy Perry were at their peak a few years ago performance was probably seen as more important than vocals, but now the industry is dominated much more by vocalists than performance type acts. It's flipped back and too a few times in the last decade.

I think in the years Simon was away they were attracting acts which reflected what was going on in the industry - the likes of Ella Henderson and James Arthur in 2012 for example, and although the live show theme weeks do hurt the format on the whole back then they were able to show their individuality. I do feel since Cowell has returned we've gone back to Pop Idol style wannabees of people who might be able to sing but have very little individuality and are pretty much cookie cutter contestants. The viewers aren't able to connect with them and the live show format especially isn't encouraging them to play to their strengths - it has a one size fits all approach. The farce of the "This is Me" week with acts singing songs they've never heard of summed it all up.
Brekkie is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 13:09
mgvsmith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,276
Commercially successful acts yes. Real music and musicians. No.
Firstly, Pop music has always had commercially successful pop acts... The Monkees, The Bay City Rollers, Sweet, Mud, Wham, Kylie, The Spice Girls, Girls Aloud amongst many others. The idea of manufactured pop music isn't new. And there has been some classic pop tunes produced along the way. The songwriting teams that have supported artists like this have talent too. Presumably you wouldn't think of Motown as having produced anything other than quality music most of the time?

Secondly, real musicians and real music belongs to a different realm for the most part. Real musicians mainly write and perform their own music and are more likely to turn up on 'Later with Jools' than the XF.

Perhaps you are expecting the new Whitney or Madonna to Adele to turn up on XF?
That train has gone.
mgvsmith is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 13:12
mgvsmith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,276
Total agreement with all your comments on this thread. The level of mass marketing & PR used to make One Direction, Little Mix etc "a thing" has been astounding. They would never have made it on musical talent alone.
We still have Little Mix songs being pumped out at every X Factor ad break to brainwash the hard of thinking into jumping on their bandwagon.
Not every artist makes it on music talent alone. The material they produce or are given is what is important. and despite your reservations, 1D's 'What makes you beautiful' and Leona Lewis's 'Bleeding Love' are great pop songs.
mgvsmith is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 13:38
sorcha_healy27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,940
Firstly, Pop music has always had commercially successful pop acts... The Monkees, The Bay City Rollers, Sweet, Mud, Wham, Kylie, The Spice Girls, Girls Aloud amongst many others. The idea of manufactured pop music isn't new. And there has been some classic pop tunes produced along the way. The songwriting teams that have supported artists like this have talent too. Presumably you wouldn't think of Motown as having produced anything other than quality music most of the time?

Secondly, real musicians and real music belongs to a different realm for the most part. Real musicians mainly write and perform their own music and are more likely to turn up on 'Later with Jools' than the XF.

Perhaps you are expecting the new Whitney or Madonna to Adele to turn up on XF?
That train has gone.
Like I said commercially successful acts like Leona and one direction have been produced. However let's not pretend the show is truthful in its intent. It would be all well and good if the show stopped pretending they wanted someone original or with music talent.
sorcha_healy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 16:22
Ænima
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 34,106
The show has produced 1D, Leona Lewis, JLS, Olly Murs and Little Mix selling nearly 100m. That's the return. There's a few classic pop singles in that and radio stations will probably still be playing 'Bleeding Love' and 'What Makes you Beautiful' 10 years from now. In the end that's not bad as an impact on pop music.
Exactly, so you're proving my point. I downplayed how much acts had made as I wasn't sure, but I knew that overall it's a success. I mean, the show makes money from advertising and phone ins, even if only one act made it, Cowell would still walk out of there in pocket, that was my point.
Ænima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 16:33
rebecca87
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,383
I think the show is out of touch with the music industry. All the acts they're pushing this year wouldn't have felt out of place if they had appeared on the show ten years ago. Except for Mason Noise, who seems to have fallen through a portal from the early 90s.
rebecca87 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:09.