If they had gone to Nick first for the judges votes, Seann would still be there.

Usually when a judge has 2 acts in a singoff, they go to that judge first and they opt not to vote between their 2 acts, which would leave 3 judges & no possibility of deadlock. Mason completely flunked that singoff, he would have been gone. It is completely pointless for them to do a singoff if they are just going to go by the public vote anyway. Nick should have said who he really wanted to save or declined to vote, what he did was worse than voting.

In the long run it makes no difference (this time), as I doubt that either of them 2 would be the eventual winner, but its REALLY unfair on Seann that he has been eliminated IMO.


(Sorry for late posting, I only just got to see Sundays show)

you really think the judges dont vote in a certain way to ensure it goes to deadlock ?

the order they vote in is irrelevant

Nope... if Simon was last he will do the same.

He wouldn`t have been able to... If Nick had refused to choose between 2 of his own acts, like they usually do, there would only be 3 votes left, so they could not go to deadlock.

They don't always go to the judge who has the acts in the bottom two first at all; they only do it when the act they (Simon/the producers) wanna save is bottom of the votes.

For example, Katie vs. Treyc in 2010.