Oh dear Olly. Almost beats Sir Terry of Wogan reading out the wrong winner of Song for Europe. How long before its announced Dermot is back?
Welcome back Dermot
Dermot quit a sinking ship just at the right time, he has no need to go back, the show needs him much more than he needs the show
He shouldn't have gone, these two are useless compared to him. Dermot didn't in 8 years make an error as big as Olly has in three weeks.
THE VOICE is moving to ITV from next year. Word is Dermot is being lined up to host it !! You have to wonder whose decision was it to go….. Syco or Dermot himself. He is a wonderful host and the two muppets currently hosting it have not a clue. Syco would have to get a major offer together and NOW if they want to win Dermot back !
Mr Dermot may not want to come back
...would you, ?
Show is on its last legs now. ...time to call it a day now! !!!
...would you, ?
Show is on its last legs now. ...time to call it a day now! !!!
Totes miss Dermot no wonder the show is falling flat on its Arse! Especially with two really crap presenters!
I hope it's true and that he is going to host The Voice. He would be a fool to go back to X Factor now I think
Dermot is said to be be lined up as a the new host for the ITV version of The Voice. Got off at just the right time.
At first I thought I wouldn't miss Dermot as much because it's about the singing & contestants not about the presenter but now I realized just how important Dermot was to the show he made it look so easy & effortless. When Dermot was presenting he was in control with Ollie & Caroline your just waiting for their next slip up.
When Ollie was apologizing on Twitter he was saying "sorry I'm still learning" ummm hello you should have learnt by now how to present live TV if not then you shouldn't be learning how to become a presenter on the main show. Your not learning your just dumb can't add up the fact that two votes each mean deadlock.
Caroline was just as bad she didn't say anything straight away when Ollie made that mistake with the deadlock situation she just let him carry on until she heard Simon shout "what?" Then she decided to pipe up
When Ollie was apologizing on Twitter he was saying "sorry I'm still learning" ummm hello you should have learnt by now how to present live TV if not then you shouldn't be learning how to become a presenter on the main show. Your not learning your just dumb can't add up the fact that two votes each mean deadlock.
Caroline was just as bad she didn't say anything straight away when Ollie made that mistake with the deadlock situation she just let him carry on until she heard Simon shout "what?" Then she decided to pipe up
Originally Posted by cantos:
“I doubt there will be a series next year.”
“I doubt there will be a series next year.”
It is contracted for next year, so pure wishful thinking in your part.
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“It is contracted for next year, so pure wishful thinking in your part.”
“It is contracted for next year, so pure wishful thinking in your part.”
Not necessarily. There's always a termination agreement in these contracts, especially for commercial broadcasters. If a company agrees to air 2 series of a sitcom that bombs terribly after the first series and is a drag on their ratings/commercial income then there's always an option for the broadcaster and/or production to end the contract early.
ITV will in no way be bound to air something it doesn't want to, even if it previously agreed to do so. There will be numerable ways that broadcasters can nix agreements to air something if circumstances dictate. Under performing in the ratings would almost definitely be in there as a 'get out' clause.
Hypothetically if the first series of a show gets 15m and the network renews it for 3 more series and series 2 the audience falls to 2m, do you really think they're bound to show the full 3-contracted series? Of course they're not.
Originally Posted by Tony_Daniels:
“Not necessarily. There's always a termination agreement in these contracts, especially for commercial broadcasters. If a company agrees to air 2 series of a sitcom that bombs terribly after the first series and is a drag on their ratings/commercial income then there's always an option for the broadcaster and/or production to end the contract early.
ITV will in no way be bound to air something it doesn't want to, even if it previously agreed to do so. There will be numerable ways that broadcasters can nix agreements to air something if circumstances dictate. Under performing in the ratings would almost definitely be in there as a 'get out' clause.
Hypothetically if the first series of a show gets 15m and the network renews it for 3 more series and series 2 the audience falls to 2m, do you really think they're bound to show the full 3-contracted series? Of course they're not.”
“Not necessarily. There's always a termination agreement in these contracts, especially for commercial broadcasters. If a company agrees to air 2 series of a sitcom that bombs terribly after the first series and is a drag on their ratings/commercial income then there's always an option for the broadcaster and/or production to end the contract early.
ITV will in no way be bound to air something it doesn't want to, even if it previously agreed to do so. There will be numerable ways that broadcasters can nix agreements to air something if circumstances dictate. Under performing in the ratings would almost definitely be in there as a 'get out' clause.
Hypothetically if the first series of a show gets 15m and the network renews it for 3 more series and series 2 the audience falls to 2m, do you really think they're bound to show the full 3-contracted series? Of course they're not.”
This may be true, but there is no logic to the argument that it will end this year. What are they gonna replace it with? Whatever they'd put there still wouldn't draw half of what XF does this year.
