|
||||||||
Why do the judges keep marking Jay down ? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
Call me cynical but some of the scores over the years have been more than questionable, and I think the judges watching the rehearsals really doesn't help. They get ideas of what they're going to mark each dance, they know what to expect from the latter dances because they just watched them a couple of hours beforehand, so will hold back scoring any of the earlier dances a decent score to give greater impact to the latter ones. However, they don't factor in the mistakes. They're willing to ignore mistakes made because they've already got an idea of which dances are the 'best' (or should have been).
I'm even willing to go one step further and bet that the leaderboard is completely tactical. Jay's getting the bulk of the votes, so they place him low on the leaderboard to ensure they get the outcome they want, knowing there's no chance of losing him. It's win/win. It happens far too often. The show is so transparent and it's heading in the same direction as The X Factor in terms of the contrived and manipulative nonsense it churns out. For what it's worth, I'm not a Jay fan, my post is just a general observation of the comments and scoring by the judges. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
Quote:
You forgot the food. I heard they serve everybody else caviar but he only gets a cheese toastie
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SESomething
Posts: 2,460
|
Quote:
I hear they make him eat dog food out of the tin on the canteen steps in the rain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Under The Ivy
Posts: 16,586
|
He should have been joint top with Anita, Georgia was overmarked again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,818
|
Quote:
I hear they make him eat dog food out of the tin on the canteen steps in the rain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
If anything surely that makes it worse?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Gormenghast Castle
Posts: 2,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
Yes, he did and yes that is why.
I think many SCD fans have become used to 'the wow factor' being a very OTT, theatrical, let's throw the book at it, verging on cartoon routine with lots of flash, bang wallop. Subtlety is lost. Not everyone knows what a good salsa is. It's not a ballroom dance. It's about rhythm, expression and sensuality that does not shout at you. He got it. OK, I do know about salsa (have been a salsa fiend for years & years) so I know what to look for. I would have preferred more authentic salsa moves, but hey ... Anita's paso on the other hand, was utterly dire and her lines, facial expression and hands were appalling. But because there was a lot of stomping, some cute dancers and masses of red material floating about, some will think it was fabulous. They are entitled to if they found it entertaining - but from a dance and technique point of view it was utter rubbish - and she was one of the contenders I actually liked. ![]() ![]() (my thoughts on subtlety, movement and general energy). Thank you ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
If anything surely that makes it worse?
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My own GYST House
Posts: 6,279
|
Quote:
Yes, he did and yes that is why.
I think many SCD fans have become used to 'the wow factor' being a very OTT, theatrical, let's throw the book at it, verging on cartoon routine with lots of flash, bang wallop. Subtlety is lost. Not everyone knows what a good salsa is. It's not a ballroom dance. It's about rhythm, expression and sensuality that does not shout at you. He got it. OK, I do know about salsa (have been a salsa fiend for years & years) so I know what to look for. I would have preferred more authentic salsa moves, but hey ... Anita's paso on the other hand, was utterly dire and her lines, facial expression and hands were appalling. But because there was a lot of stomping, some cute dancers and masses of red material floating about, some will think it was fabulous. They are entitled to if they found it entertaining - but from a dance and technique point of view it was utter rubbish - and she was one of the contenders I actually liked. ) said that I'd enjoyed Jays dance but that it didn't have it for me compared to Anitas. Thing is, whilst I take everything on board you say about dance techniques. aside from a few lessons a few years ago, watching Strictly and an ill advised (but wonderful) fling with a Cuba dancer. I know little about what steps should be there. I don't know if that's the same for most viewers but I imagine it is TBH.. and I liked Anita's dance better and found it more entertaining. Sorry... and I'd like to add that I think that Jay is a great dancer and if he's danced Anitas routine I'd probably gone for his dance as best. Maybe it was not technically good and 'utterly dire' as you say, although I'd hate to think that I'm that bad at judging, but still I genuinely liked it better than Jay's and Georgia's dances, both of whom I like and rate as contestants. |
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 512
|
Quote:
Yeah agreed.
Honestly I was jumping about cheering his marks (his second highest score) so I clearly didn't think he was hugely undermarked, although I thought he'd get a Darcey 10, but I got more and more miffed as the night went on and dances with little content or mistakes were given 10s It's definitely not feeling that Jay was undermarked, it's the comparison to the 3 routines above him. Luckily Helen came below Jay as that has to be, IMO, one of, if not THE worst dance she has ever done on the show. She was out of time, stumbling and looking confused in at least a couple of places. Of course everyone saw her fall up the stairs, but even with all that she still gets 34 which is an incredible score considering Jay made one mistake last week and got hammered for it. Kellie and Kevin's dance was ok, I liked it enough that their scores were fine and I was VERY pleased to see Anita finally get scores that merit her dancing, but Georgia's dance I felt did not deserve such high praise and scores. This will be two weeks in a row now she has made mistakes in a dance, this week more so than last, and yet got 10's from the Judges. When Craig and Darcy gave 9's I figured it would be 9's all the way and that would annoy me as Jay didn't put a foot wrong, but I could of lived with it, but 10's from Len and Bruno p*ssed me off royally. She was out of time with the backing dancers in her solo dancing and near the start of the dance she comes out of a spin with Giovanni and for a second looks lost as to where she should be going then spots the three guys waiting for her and heads off to them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,058
|
Jay is following the usual scripted curve of the winner:
Someone come along and is stunningly above everyone else in the early stages and so they can't have him being top every week as that doesn't make a show. So after praising him, they start slagging him off and marking him down. they know the public voting figures so there is no chance of losing him and so they are safe to play their 'how to make a show' script and manipulate things for drama. Then closer to the end, Jay will storm back from the pretend jaws of defeat, win the show and have the judges all saying "Oh we knew that he was the winner all along". The exact same script was used with Lewis Smith: Find out he is excellent. Knock him down and then build up to the finish. And all totally independent of what he actually danced like. If he danced well of a week where the script needed to put him down, they would find fault somewhere. Yet on a week where they needed to build him up, they would ignore any faults and scream undying love. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,589
|
Quote:
As others have said, I thought four 9s was perfectly fair and acceptable in terms of Jay's Salsa. It was what followed which made it an "undermarked" dance.
It feels like the show is now at odds with Waite's Warm Up on It Takes Two - Ian points out deficiencies in performances on Wednesday/Thursday which have not been sorted out by Saturday yet the judges ignore them. Ian stresses that it's important for the female to be vased shape in ballroom dances - Kellie was upright yet they get 10s. Ian stresses the importance of intense flamenco shaping in the Paso Doble - Anita struggled with this yet gets 10s. Georgia didn't spot a spin, resulting in her ending up off balance and out of sync with the backing dancers yet she gets 10s. Someone said earlier in the thread they don't understand the technical aspects and goes with the emotional aspect of the dance and that's completely right - that's the point of the public vote. In general it's a "Who's your favourite?" rather than "Who's the best dancer?" But the judges should be above that, voting on the technicalities of the dance. It feels like they only do that when it suits them at the moment which gives Ola's comment (if she did say it) about the scores being fixed more weight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,403
|
Quote:
Jay is following the usual scripted curve of the winner:
Someone come along and is stunningly above everyone else in the early stages and so they can't have him being top every week as that doesn't make a show. So after praising him, they start slagging him off and marking him down. they know the public voting figures so there is no chance of losing him and so they are safe to play their 'how to make a show' script and manipulate things for drama. Then closer to the end, Jay will storm back from the pretend jaws of defeat, win the show and have the judges all saying "Oh we knew that he was the winner all along". The exact same script was used with Lewis Smith: Find out he is excellent. Knock him down and then build up to the finish. And all totally independent of what he actually danced like. If he danced well of a week where the script needed to put him down, they would find fault somewhere. Yet on a week where they needed to build him up, they would ignore any faults and scream undying love. |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
Quote:
oh, but there is vegetarian dog food...
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 933
|
Quote:
Will it make him do big poos though? Just asking for a friend(/Jamelia)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
Will it make him do big poos though? Just asking for a friend(/Jamelia)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
I hear what you say, but...Jay danced first and had a 9 from all 4 judges so the only question for them from that point is did Kellie/Anita/Georgia dance better than Jay or not. I would say that in all three cases they did, whether there were minor technical deficiencies or not. If as a judge I have given a score of 9 to someone and somebody else comes along who I think is better, what score should I give to that somebody else? The only score I have to go to in order to signify that I thought they were better is 10 and so that is what I should score them. Now, perhaps if I had started out by giving Jay a 7 or an 8, I could do the necessary without awarding a score of 10
![]() The public have different views on what is better, hence the public vote. But the judges should be far more locked in on technique than they were last night. This is not the first series and won't be the last when some couples are let off for deficiencies and others are criticised, marked down accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,589
|
Quote:
Technically Jay was superior to Kellie, Anita and Georgia for the reasons I said. People on here who have technical expertise (well, okay, person) says as much too. All four judges stated he nailed the character of the dance.
The public have different views on what is better, hence the public vote. But the judges should be far more locked in on technique than they were last night. This is not the first series and won't be the last when some couples are let off for deficiencies and others are criticised, marked down accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South East
Posts: 3,273
|
Quote:
I hear what you say, but...Jay danced first and had a 9 from all 4 judges so the only question for them from that point is did Kellie/Anita/Georgia dance better than Jay or not. I would say that in all three cases they did, whether there were minor technical deficiencies or not. If as a judge I have given a score of 9 to someone and somebody else comes along who I think is better, what score should I give to that somebody else? The only score I have to go to in order to signify that I thought they were better is 10 and so that is what I should score them. Now, perhaps if I had started out by giving Jay a 7 or an 8, I could do the necessary without awarding a score of 10
![]() If I was scripting that show, I would have wanted Len to give a 10 and then one of the other judges could have given a 10 to Kellie for her quickstep). No way was Anita's dance skills close to either Kellie or Jay - but that was to be expected. However, the dance content and technique FOR ANITA, the non-dancer, wasn't 10 worthy. I do get frustrated when I feel people say Anita's dancing was brilliant (her performance was good, dancing not so much) rather than Gleb's choreography was dramatic and worthy of a 10. Georgia, as already mentioned, faltered more than once on her spins, which surely in a VW-inspired routine is a serious mistake rather than one to be overlooked. |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: A Spot in the Deise
Posts: 1,580
|
Quote:
Its great hearing another dancers comments on the leaders dances last night. Not sure which style you dance but my own take on it was that only Kellie's dancing technique and performance warranted equal marks to Jay.
If I was scripting that show, I would have wanted Len to give a 10 and then one of the other judges could have given a 10 to Kellie for her quickstep). No way was Anita's dance skills close to either Kellie or Jay - but that was to be expected. However, the dance content and technique FOR ANITA, the non-dancer, wasn't 10 worthy. I do get frustrated when I feel people say Anita's dancing was brilliant (her performance was good, dancing not so much) rather than Gleb's choreography was dramatic and worthy of a 10. Georgia, as already mentioned, faltered more than once on her spins, which surely in a VW-inspired routine is a serious mistake rather than one to be overlooked. A score ranging from 1 to 10 (although only Craig uses the full range ) is quite a coarse tool to reflect differences in technique and performance. Would it improve the show if the judges gave two scores, one for technical merit and one for performance?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,589
|
Quote:
Its great hearing another dancers comments on the leaders dances last night. Not sure which style you dance but my own take on it was that only Kellie's dancing technique and performance warranted equal marks to Jay.
If I was scripting that show, I would have wanted Len to give a 10 and then one of the other judges could have given a 10 to Kellie for her quickstep). No way was Anita's dance skills close to either Kellie or Jay - but that was to be expected. However, the dance content and technique FOR ANITA, the non-dancer, wasn't 10 worthy. I do get frustrated when I feel people say Anita's dancing was brilliant (her performance was good, dancing not so much) rather than Gleb's choreography was dramatic and worthy of a 10. Georgia, as already mentioned, faltered more than once on her spins, which surely in a VW-inspired routine is a serious mistake rather than one to be overlooked. I don't think it is a question of overlooking things in the dances. In truth, if these celebs were being judged against experienced couples all of them would struggle to score anything above a 1. They aren't, they are being judged comparatively between themselves taking into account both technique and performance and so long as the marks produce a fair ranking it doesn't matter what scores are dished out to achieve that. Different viewers, and different judges, will have differing preferences on the weightings they give to those two elements but that doesn't make either wrong. Overall I think that last night's leaderboard was a fair result. It wouldn't have been in the order I would have had them but I can't say that there isn't any justification for it and certainly 1st and last were pretty clear cut to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Under The Ivy
Posts: 16,586
|
Quote:
Its great hearing another dancers comments on the leaders dances last night. Not sure which style you dance but my own take on it was that only Kellie's dancing technique and performance warranted equal marks to Jay.
If I was scripting that show, I would have wanted Len to give a 10 and then one of the other judges could have given a 10 to Kellie for her quickstep). No way was Anita's dance skills close to either Kellie or Jay - but that was to be expected. However, the dance content and technique FOR ANITA, the non-dancer, wasn't 10 worthy. I do get frustrated when I feel people say Anita's dancing was brilliant (her performance was good, dancing not so much) rather than Gleb's choreography was dramatic and worthy of a 10. Georgia, as already mentioned, faltered more than once on her spins, which surely in a VW-inspired routine is a serious mistake rather than one to be overlooked. I believe Jay was undermarked, but I think he was on par with Anita. (Who has no training, unlike Jay and Kellie.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
Quote:
All of this strikes a chord with me, a non-dancer, and makes sense.
A score ranging from 1 to 10 (although only Craig uses the full range ) is quite a coarse tool to reflect differences in technique and performance. Would it improve the show if the judges gave two scores, one for technical merit and one for performance? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:02.






