This to me is a crucial point - no way was that a jive. On Friday's It Takes 2, L.Smith said that Peter was not doing any kicks and flicks, so I particularly looked out for them and he was right!

I did a post on that BBC thread with just one word 'FIX'.

I then got an email from the BBC saying the post had been removed because it 'contained potentially defamatory statements'.

Presumably they thought everyone else's comments were defamatory too, and of course not true ... no not at all ... well hardly ... well prove it!

What on earth are people on about! Both Peter and Jamelua were awful. She's flat footed and ungainly, he's just so arrogant, it's obvious he doesn't take direction from anybody! They had to save somebody, Jamelia was obviously disliked by the public so perhaps they decided to put her out of her agony.

Very disappointed with the BBC.

I agree...might even throw a vote his way next week...although might just stick with Anton!!

Well said! It's definitely making me want to vote for him now. Thanks DS!

Opinions eh. If we don't like Peter, it is allowed you know.....

I don't really see a lot of 'hate' for Peter on here, it's directed at the judges and producers. I know Peter is not popular on here but most of us know its not his fault he is still in.

I totally understand the anger/annoyance/confusion directed at the judges picking & choosing when they take the DO into account and when they totally disregard it.

I am afraid the burden of proof would be on you to back up your statement and prove it was a fix. If you can't prove the truth of a stement it is defamatory to publish it. Any responsible publisher would remove such a statement becasue the publisher is deemed to be as culpable as the author.

Oh we're all in trouble then

'fraid so. .

You don't really understand the rules of the dance off, do you dear?[/quote]Peter is the better dancer but it was supposed to be judged on the last dance and Jamelia soared over Peter in her quickstep.. talk about a fiddle.. iM embarrassed for the judges..

Someone might feel moved do a FOI request to find out the protocol for determining who goes through and who gets eliminated after a dance off.

Just notice something on the i player about the Dance off result, when the Judges where announcing who they will save did anyone notice that Darcey was looking somewhere else when she said i save Pater

hHe was crap and if theyre basing it on that nights dance he should have gone, but I think the judges know if they save jammy again she'd just be in the dance off next week anyway so put her out of her misery.

A fix

Are the people crying fix going to stop watching and voting ?

Any truth to the rumour that there was booing from the audience when the judges voted to save Peter Andre?

I read it elsewhere, in a comment supposedly from someone who was in the audience.

They also said that Peter didn't get a standing ovation after his dance but the producers made the audience do one later, which was then edited in for the results show?

Lets face it ...the judges are all stooges. The producers crack the whip. The winner has already been chosen. ( providing they escape injury or prison. lol.)
Overmarking.... Undermarking.. etc.
Re: Blackpool DO.
Darcey's face ( hiding it in humiliation and thinking only of her pay cheque )
Bruno and Craig are essentially the overpaid shows clowns. And Len's pitiful gesture in his disagreement with the other 3 stooges was transparent. Bahahaha !

Hi. I have not watched the i player results show. Must check it out. thanks for the info

The DS mole said that on Saturday night and it was backed up by Jamelia on Monday evening's It Takes Two

funny how someone who was also there said it was not true. peter haters are going to believe what suits them.

What I'd like to know,from a verifiable,reliable and non-partisan source is
which of the two dances was most appreciated by the audience at Blackpool that night.

Jeremy's! You know everyone was thinking "if only" after Craig did the stand-in thing.
Last edited by anothermi : 24-11-2015 at 05:00