• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Thanks Digital Spy for spoiling the ending for anyone catching up...
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
andy1231
25-11-2015
Originally Posted by tiggerpooh:
“How is that possible?

We saw the raven go through her chest and she slowly fell to the floor, her lifeless body just lying there, her eyes closed.

There is no way she could come back from that. The Doctor could see her ghost, like River Song in The Name of the Doctor, but other than that? No! She's gone for good!”

I was being a bit sarcastic actually, but I will be amazed if she is really dead and we don't see her in the series finale.
ntscuser
25-11-2015
Originally Posted by DiscoP:
“The BBC aren't usually as open about things as they were with Clara's exit. I guess there could be a couple of reasons for this. Maybe they wanted to lesson the shock of her death for some viewers, particularly kids, as some people do seem rather trigger happy when it comes to dialling offcom these days, or maybe they wanted to drum up a bit more publicity for the show in the face of falling overnight ratings.”

Or deliberate misdirection in the knowledge that she isn't really dead?
DiscoP
25-11-2015
Originally Posted by ntscuser:
“Or deliberate misdirection in the knowledge that she isn't really dead?”

I love Clara but I'll be ruddy annoyed if she doesn't stay dead this time
sebbie3000
25-11-2015
Originally Posted by little-monster:
“Why on earth you being rude to me?
A reminder of why i don't post here a lot because of unnecessary rudeness by people such as yourself. You don't make this place easier for outsiders.”

How is that rude?
GDK
25-11-2015
Originally Posted by sebbie3000:
“How is that rude? ”

It isn't rude really, but so many users get irritated when their grammar or punctuation is corrected that it's a forum rule not to mention it. I think that's wrong, myself, but it is what it is.

In the grand scheme of things I suppose bad grammar isn't important as long as the meaning is clear.

It's been a while since I've seen a post here with grammar that was so bad that I didn't read it. It's the "stream of consciousness" posts entirely without punctuation that are so difficult to read that you think the poster wasn't bothered about the reader that I find irritating.

"Of" instead of 've (to shorten "have") is, sadly, one of the more common errors.
Brandon_Smith
27-11-2015
Originally Posted by technoflare:
“Didn't see Saturday's show live as I was working. Now I know I should have avoided ds until I caught up but they at least usually keep the ending to within the story... Not in the headline!

Looking forward to a new companion though....”

Its kinda ignorant thinking there wouldn't be a headline spoiling it.
bennythedip
27-11-2015
Im out Saturday so I'm totally avoiding the site anytime after 6.
ntscuser
27-11-2015
Originally Posted by Brandon_Smith:
“Its kinda ignorant thinking there wouldn't be a headline spoiling it.”

How is it "ignorant" to think there wouldn't be headline spoiling it before the show has even aired?
Brandon_Smith
28-11-2015
Originally Posted by ntscuser:
“How is it "ignorant" to think there wouldn't be headline spoiling it before the show has even aired?”

I'm not talking about headlines before the show aired :/
ntscuser
28-11-2015
Originally Posted by Brandon_Smith:
“I'm not talking about headlines before the show aired :/”

But that is exactly what DS did last Saturday and what this thread is about.
Brandon_Smith
28-11-2015
Originally Posted by ntscuser:
“But that is exactly what DS did last Saturday and what this thread is about.”

Its not what exactly this thread is about, its about someone looking at major Doctor Who headliners before he even caught up on the episode and this was after it aired
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map