• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Have ANY of the papers covered this?
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
An Thropologist
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by primer:
“i'm not arguing about whether anyone's opinion is right or wrong, i'm arguing that an opinion isn't a fact. important difference, if you don't mind. ”

I agree with you Primer and you are right. But I think the standard of debate such as it was is going down the pan don't you?
abigailsmum
23-11-2015
I get a feeling it will be in the papers about re-recording the reaction to pondrays dance in the DO to show a standing ovation WILL end up in the papers tomorrow as Jamelia has just said it happened on ITT - Go Jamelia!!!
TerryM22
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by primer:
“0.008% of the audience are over invested and laughably think its news...”

This is probably the fairest summary there is.
primer
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“I agree with you Primer and you are right. But I think the standard of debate such as it was is going down the pan don't you? ”

i'd say it was about average for the board....
Tejas
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by abigailsmum:
“I get a feeling it will be in the papers about re-recording the reaction to pondrays dance in the DO to show a standing ovation WILL end up in the papers tomorrow as Jamelia has just said it happened on ITT - Go Jamelia!!!”

I certainly hope so. Go Jamelia!!!
cwickham
23-11-2015
Pre-recorded episode of reality show is edited manipulatively. Not really a scoop.
Tejas
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by Ellie1967:
“Since when have any of the tabloids worried about their stories being grounded in fact? It is a fact that hundreds of people have been expressing the opinion that the show is fixed - that's all they really need to make a story if they were so inclined.”

Absolutely, and that's normally more than enough to make a story out of. However, now they do actually have a fact to work with - the fact that Jamelia has backed up an existing statement that Peter's standing ovation was manufactured.
steff0202
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“The papers are so in love with Andre (voluntarily or paid off?) that it was unlikely to kick off. They'd much rather print stuff about who is Jay has bedded this week or have nasty digs at Kristina. ”

So basically Peter Andre has influence over the BBC and the papers, I had no idea he was so powerful. Andre for PM 😂😂😂
steff0202
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by Elsa:
“If James Jordan is to be believed, the Mail gets fed stories straight from the BBC all the time, so maybe they're protecting their usual source for Strictly scandal stuff.”

and if ex dancer James Jordan says it is true it must be, he's just a stirrer have you not realised that yet.
Polly-T
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by Daisy Bennyboots:
“Actually I would have expected the tabloids to have covered it simply because they sell sensationalism - and any whiff of a Strictly scandal they love. Ask Kristina. Or Ben Cohen's motherin-law. Or Ola's calendar...or shock exits or drop out or Anton calling someone a ****.
The Peter /Jamelia fan outrage is the kind of thing the tabloids love, especially given how much is was being talked about across all social media, it's notable that no-one is mentioning the one thing everyone is talking about.”

Peters PR Mgt co must be very powerful if they can keep this story out of the papers. It is justification for wot Ola said to The Sun and should be a natural follow up. Crazy they can print lies about Jay but won't print the news about Peter.
cwickham
23-11-2015
I think we're at risk of overstating this story if we seriously think that Peter's PR team are working to keep it out of the papers. More likely is that it's not much of a story and only the vocal minority here are really making much of it.
missmuffett27
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by CaroUK:
“I'll give him that his Charleston was good and he deserved to top the leaderboard for that - but every other week he's been well overmarked and had glaring errors ignored by the judges which meant he was protected from low public votes by an artificially high placing on the leaderboard.

I can see him m being in the dance off from here on in - as a protest from the public”

're his Charleston dance,his professional dancer had assistance to choreograph that particular dance for him.He should have gone last night....
davegold
23-11-2015
Lets have a look at my awful Yahoo news feed. It has

"The X-Factor: Anton Stevens voted off show but he doesn't go quietly"
X-Factor's Mason Noise "I was drugged up for last night's performance"
Ola Jordan looks downcast after claims "she'll never work for the BBC again"
Georgia May Foote celebrates Strictly success as she parties in a TINY dress
Tweeters were slightly offended by Take That's fashion choices on Strictly
I'm a celebrity 2015: Twitter absolutely loved Duncan Bannatyne putting Lady C in her place

Even though the standard of journalism on Yahoo and its partners is shockingly low this seems to be right up their street. Modern journos seem to like nothing more than copying and pasting a few social media comments and making them into a story.
Ellie1967
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by davegold:
“Lets have a look at my awful Yahoo news feed. It has

"The X-Factor: Anton Stevens voted off show but he doesn't go quietly"
X-Factor's Mason Noise "I was drugged up for last night's performance"
Ola Jordan looks downcast after claims "she'll never work for the BBC again"
Georgia May Foote celebrates Strictly success as she parties in a TINY dress
Tweeters were slightly offended by Take That's fashion choices on Strictly
I'm a celebrity 2015: Twitter absolutely loved Duncan Bannatyne putting Lady C in her place

Even though the standard of journalism on Yahoo and its partners is shockingly low this seems to be right up their street. Modern journos seem to like nothing more than copying and pasting a few social media comments and making them into a story.”

Exactly I don't get why people are saying 'perhaps its not much of a story' when that has never ever stopped them before - this is exactly the kind of 'controversy' the papers normally love to hype up.
davegold
23-11-2015
Actually, I'll give an answer to this mystery. The people who write the entertainment stories are clearly just writing the articles they are told to write by their editors and PR companies. They get told to write about dresses at an award ceremony so they do that. They don't have any initiative to search out any news and form an opinion for themselves. Clearly, Jamelia hasn't got a PR team phoning up the papers with 'her side of' the story.
smilliekylie
23-11-2015
Hmmm Daily Mirror finally running with tonight's Jamelia comments

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/j...-peter-6888077
Polly-T
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by smilliekylie:
“Hmmm Daily Mirror finally running with tonight's Jamelia comments

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/j...-peter-6888077”

At last!!
steff0202
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by smilliekylie:
“Hmmm Daily Mirror finally running with tonight's Jamelia comments
6
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/j...-peter-6888077”

SO now she is out the real Loose Women Jamelia is back, the judges she is criticising saved her 4 flipping times and I'm sure the BBC paid her well. She also got invaluable exposure, spoiled it a bit Jamelia, was beginning to warm to her.
Shopaholic26
23-11-2015
http://uk.blastingnews.com/showbiz-t...-00665013.html
RachelBlackburn
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by smilliekylie:
“Hmmm Daily Mirror finally running with tonight's Jamelia comments

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/j...-peter-6888077”

Did Peter's DO jive get a standing ovation the first time? Or is that BBC spokesperson lying through their teeth?
shinycushion
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by RachelBlackburn:
“Did Peter's DO jive get a standing ovation the first time? Or is that BBC spokesperson lying through their teeth?”

From the mole it sounded like they had to film an ovation for him but the way Jamelia said it made it sound like they just re-filmed another one for him?
Polly-T
23-11-2015
Originally Posted by RachelBlackburn:
“Did Peter's DO jive get a standing ovation the first time? Or is that BBC spokesperson lying through their teeth?”

No it didn't get a standing ovation the first time - wasn't recognisable as a jive
paralax
23-11-2015
Make your mind up Jamelia, the other week it was the public's fault because they didn't like her, I wonder why.

I have never been a fan of Peter, nor do I dislike him, but I am beginning to feel sorry for him, there seems to be a lot of irrational hatred for him, and a desire to see him fail.

Overall he has been better than Jamelia, a standing ovation didn't save him, three of the judges did.
shinycushion
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by paralax:
“Make your mind up Jamelia, the other week it was the public's fault because they didn't like her, I wonder why.

I have never been a fan of Peter, nor do I dislike him, but I am beginning to feel sorry for him, there seems to be a lot of irrational hatred for him, and a desire to see him fail.

Overall he has been better than Jamelia, a standing ovation didn't save him, three of the judges did.”

Those are two entirely different situations?

And no one is saying the standing ovation saved him.... just that it seemed to be put in place to make the three judges who did look more credible.
Heatherbell
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by cwickham:
“I think we're at risk of overstating this story if we seriously think that Peter's PR team are working to keep it out of the papers. More likely is that it's not much of a story and only the vocal minority here are really making much of it.”

It's a load of cobblers from two bitter women with axes to grind .
It is physically impossible to rig long run of dance shows . All sorts of things crop up . Illnesses can occur, close bereavements (God forbid), accidents causing physical inability to proceed . There are too many variables to plan THAT far ahead , it's weird to believe otherwise .
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map