• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Jay and the Toddler thread
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Dervlathedog
24-11-2015
Has it gone? Was looking forward to seeing how that had developed
yellowlabbie
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“Has it gone? Was looking forward to seeing how that had developed ”

I can't find it. I did say they would get it deleted. They do it all the time.
hannah
24-11-2015
There is nothing more to be said thats why it got deleted

A tweet for the baby's mom

Lyndsey Tickner
@JayMcGuiness it was my baby boy Ray dancing .He didn't take offence, but would like to keep his curls. #teamjay
dellzincht
24-11-2015
I'm glad the thread got deleted, it was full of pathetic and nasty comments.
annw
24-11-2015
funny the thread on jay gets deleted and the nasty ones on peter get kept.
Goaty
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by dellzincht:
“I'm glad the thread got deleted, it was full of pathetic and nasty comments.”

Agreed too
yellowlabbie
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by annw:
“funny the thread on jay gets deleted and the nasty ones on peter get kept.”

Yes ann, happens all the time as I have said before. Every anti-Jay thread has been removed.
dellzincht
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by annw:
“funny the thread on jay gets deleted and the nasty ones on peter get kept.”

Some of the stuff in the Jay thread was bordering on libellous.

People just don't like Peter Andre, deal with it.
shrinkingviolet
24-11-2015
It was a terrible thread full of desperately over-reactionary 'won't someone think of the children!!!' Nonsense from the easily offended (or the faux offended.) so I'm glad it was closed, I'm just surprised it was deleted.
StrictlyRed
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by annw:
“funny the thread on jay gets deleted and the nasty ones on peter get kept.”

It wasn't just nasty though, it ended up crossing the line of taste and decency with some particularly sick posts, and ended up having absolutely nothing to do with Strictly, so I'm glad that someone complained.

So, for the OP of this thread - why bring it up again? The mother of the toddler in question has no problem, as shown by her tweet, so why does anyone else?
yellowlabbie
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by dellzincht:
“Some of the stuff in the Jay thread was bordering on libellous.

People just don't like Peter Andre, deal with it.”

and some people don't like Jay.
Dervlathedog
24-11-2015
But why?

Jay's own App Thread discusses the thing he said in terms far stronger than the Lost Thread, which was humorous, I thought. Has that gone too!?

Jay said the thing openly on ITT; it's been in the Mirror. It makes no sense to delete people's responses to it.

Jamelia's comments on the SO that were delivered on ITT and reported in the Mirror have also got DS reaction and those threads still stand.
yellowlabbie
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by StrictlyRed:
“It wasn't just nasty though, it ended up crossing the line of taste and decency with some particularly sick posts, and ended up having absolutely nothing to do with Strictly, so I'm glad that someone complained.

So, for the OP of this thread - why bring it up again? The mother of the toddler in question has no problem, as shown by her tweet, so why does anyone else?”

But she's a Jay fan, of course she wouldn't.
Oicho Throw
24-11-2015
I, too, am glad when people are prevented from discussing things on a discussion forum.
Nina_Blake
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“But why?

Jay's own App Thread discusses the thing he said in terms far stronger than the Lost Thread, which was humorous, I thought. Has that gone too!?

Jay said the thing openly on ITT; it's been in the Mirror. It makes no sense to delete people's responses to it.

Jamelia's comments on the SO that were delivered on ITT and reported in the Mirror have also got DS reaction and those threads still stand.”

I'm honestly not sure what happened to that thread. By the end of it, it was just people making jokes. There are plenty of threads that stray from the original topic on this forum. Probably best not to question any decisions made here...you won't get a real response.
dellzincht
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“and some people don't like Jay.”

Yes, but posting libellous comments could get the owners of this forum into serious trouble.

People slating Peter isn't the same thing.
sidsgirl
24-11-2015
I thought it was a weird thing for Jay to say, but l don't think it was malicious
Arcana
24-11-2015
People here should know better than to take the name of St Jay in vain. ⛪
yellowlabbie
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by dellzincht:
“Yes, but posting libellous comments could get the owners of this forum into serious trouble.

People slating Peter isn't the same thing.”

and they always go for the libellous comments excuse. I have seen it all before many times on DS, they alert the mods en masse.
Dervlathedog
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by Nina_Blake:
“I'm honestly not sure what happened to that thread. By the end of it, it was just people making jokes. There are plenty of threads that stray from the original topic on this forum. Probably best not to question any decisions made here...you won't get a real response.”

Righto. Going to miss that thread though...
sidsgirl
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by dellzincht:
“Yes, but posting libellous comments could get the owners of this forum into serious trouble.

People slating Peter isn't the same thing.”

What about people slating his wife and casting aspersions on her being a doctor?
Nina_Blake
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by dellzincht:
“Yes, but posting libellous comments could get the owners of this forum into serious trouble.

People slating Peter isn't the same thing.”

Being serious here, I don't remember seeing libellous posts in that thread.

Some overreactions (yes, probably me!) and snide comments, but was there anything that could have more serious implications?
vald
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by Dervlathedog:
“But why?

Jay's own App Thread discusses the thing he said in terms far stronger than the Lost Thread, which was humorous, I thought. Has that gone too!?

Jay said the thing openly on ITT; it's been in the Mirror. It makes no sense to delete people's responses to it.

Jamelia's comments on the SO that were delivered on ITT and reported in the Mirror have also got DS reaction and those threads still stand
.”

Maybe because they are relevant to the show and hence this forum.

Implying that a contestant meant violence to a toddler crosses the line. We all know he didn't, the mother knows he didn't, I imagine the producers know he didn't.

Besides people were making some very sick jokes on that thread.
yellowlabbie
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“Maybe because they are relevant to the show and hence this forum.

Implying that a contestant meant violence to a toddler crosses the line. We all know he didn't, the mother knows he didn't, I imagine the producers know he didn't.

Besides people were making some very sick jokes on that thread.”

Ok then delete the posts not the whole thread.
Nina_Blake
24-11-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“Maybe because they are relevant to the show and hence this forum.

Implying that a contestant meant violence to a toddler crosses the line. We all know he didn't, the mother knows he didn't, I imagine the producers know he didn't.

Besides people were making some very sick jokes on that thread.”

There are threads still standing where users make claims that Peter has planted stories, influenced the judges vote, and acted aggressively towards other contestants/pros.

There isn't any concrete evidence for any of it, so does that not constitute libel in the same way as the Jay thread?

In which case, I can only imagine the jokes made in the thread caused it to be removed.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map