The article sounds more like it's taking the piss out of anyone who thinks that's remotely believable to me but hey ho...
And yet it's been explained many times now that it was just a localism, a way of saying how uber-cute the little child was?
”
”

”


All I really meant is that Jay would only have said what he said if it was a completely familiar and instinctive way to him of expressing delight. I can see why it raised people's hackles but equally, the fact that it was an instinctive reaction on his part should - imo - negate any suggestion that it was meant in anything other than a big heart-melting reaction to a little child way. 




