DS Forums

 
 

O2 4G Cornwall


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24-11-2015, 16:54
brillopad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St Ives, Cornwall
Posts: 3,177

4G live in Penzance for two days - it's from the mast at Newlyn Combe - signal in Penzance town centre is quite weak and is gone by the Railway Station.

Nothing on O2 coverage widget about this.
brillopad is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 24-11-2015, 16:59
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
Possibly 800MHz. I've noticed a bit more of it popping up (and seen some work happen in Truro - the Vodafone pole near Sainsburys has had a new cabinet installed). I live somewhere between Bodmin and St. Austell and notice I can pick up O2 4G here now.

I don't have a topped up SIM on either Vodafone or O2 so I can't try it out.
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2015, 18:23
Stereo Steve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,373
Train don''t stop Camborne Wednesdays. Don't stop here neither.
Stereo Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2015, 21:39
M1kos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 499
Definitely will be 800 and Vodafone is now live there as well
M1kos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 10:19
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,683
Could it be anything other than 800??
I thought that's all they had.
Clarification?
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 12:00
blueacid
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,528
Could it be anything other than 800??
I thought that's all they had.
Clarification?
They had a bit of 1800Mhz which they ran 2g within in busy areas.. wonder whether that allocation is large enough for some 4g instead?
blueacid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 13:02
Minardi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 502
They had a bit of 1800Mhz which they ran 2g within in busy areas.. wonder whether that allocation is large enough for some 4g instead?
5.8MHz each way, not a great deal but it would support perhaps 30Meg?
Minardi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 13:04
Pedro_C
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 660
5.8MHz each way, not a great deal but it would support perhaps 30Meg?
Think it's 40meg max, but yeah, O2's using it in London alongside 800.
Pedro_C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 13:20
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
Could it be anything other than 800??
I thought that's all they had.
Clarification?
Don't O2 and Vodafone still have a tiny slither of 1800 from the GSM days?

O2 around here still uses theirs for GSM, or at least they did a few months ago, as I could get an O2 signal on a single band 1800MHz phone, even though I live in a rural area
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 14:29
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,683
Don't O2 and Vodafone still have a tiny slither of 1800 from the GSM days?

O2 around here still uses theirs for GSM, or at least they did a few months ago, as I could get an O2 signal on a single band 1800MHz phone, even though I live in a rural area
I think you might have missed the posts above yours!
But yeah, thanks, I forgot. Several O2 2G1800 sites in Plymouth I believe.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 14:36
japaul
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
Yes, O2 have enough to run a 2x5MHz 4G service at 1800 but this is only being used to supplement 800 in busy areas so any initial deployment will be 800.

In fact, the way it's being setup means that in areas with 4G 1800, it's only used if you have a 4G+ phone (for 800 + 1800 carrier aggregation) or a 4G phone which can't use 800 like an iPhone 5.

On the shared sites the parameter setups for O2 and Vodafone are virtually identical. So cell reselection priority for 800 is 5 and for 3G it's 4 (with Vodafone 2600 on 6 but this isn't relevant for O2). However on O2 sites with 4G 1800, the priority for O2 800 has been changed from 5 to 6 leaving a gap for 1800 to slot into.

This suggests to me that originally O2 didn't have any plans to deploy 1800 for 4G in the short term otherwise the original setup template would have been designed to accommodate it without needing to be changed. Perhaps they are feeling the heat in terms of capacity sooner than they thought they would in the busier areas.
japaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 20:42
Minardi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 502
I didn't realise O2 even had plans to use 4G 1800 so I suspect it may have been a recent decision, this is the first talk of it I've seen. My local O2 site is 2G1800, so O2 must be running a program of clearing these down and pushing it all onto 900? Can't be that much space on 900, seeing as the old E-TACS chunk is now used for 3G900.
Minardi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-11-2015, 21:26
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,683
Yes, O2 have enough to run a 2x5MHz 4G service at 1800 but this is only being used to supplement 800 in busy areas so any initial deployment will be 800.

In fact, the way it's being setup means that in areas with 4G 1800, it's only used if you have a 4G+ phone (for 800 + 1800 carrier aggregation) or a 4G phone which can't use 800 like an iPhone 5.

On the shared sites the parameter setups for O2 and Vodafone are virtually identical. So cell reselection priority for 800 is 5 and for 3G it's 4 (with Vodafone 2600 on 6 but this isn't relevant for O2). However on O2 sites with 4G 1800, the priority for O2 800 has been changed from 5 to 6 leaving a gap for 1800 to slot into.

This suggests to me that originally O2 didn't have any plans to deploy 1800 for 4G in the short term otherwise the original setup template would have been designed to accommodate it without needing to be changed. Perhaps they are feeling the heat in terms of capacity sooner than they thought they would in the busier areas.
Excellent info as usual.
Just a general question...
Does LTE have any built in way to push handsets between frequencies?
For example, say a cell's 2600 was swamped but the 1800 (or 800) was only under 50% load, can the network move the handset to 1800?
Or is this controlled entirely by the handset and it will stick doggedly to an overloaded carrier as it's the higher priority.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2015, 11:11
japaul
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
Yes it does but there's a few things to bear in mind.

I think I've mentioned here before that when we talk of cell reselection priority it's relevant for idle mode only i.e. when you aren't doing anything the phone gets to decide which cell to camp on based on parameters like crp supplied by the network. In theory the network could serve up different parameters if it knew a cell was congested but you could argue why bother if you aren't doing anything.

Once you start doing something you shift to active or connected mode and the network takes over the decisions (based on measurements sent back by the phone) and changing cells becomes handover (network controlled) as opposed to reselection (handset controlled). Now there's the possibility of doing handover based load balancing to do what you are asking. However there are still drawbacks as handovers take quite a long time once you take into account measurements and the actual process itself. It also increases unreliability as any handover is an opportunity for data interruption or a call drop.

The best solution is for us all to be using carrier aggregation as you get really fast load balancing as part of the packet scheduler. Some dismiss CA because they deem the higher theoretical speeds unnecessary (including a few posts I've seen here) but it also provides capacity benefits separate from the extra spectrum used because of the efficient load balancing and so helps out the network and end users (including those who don't have CA capable phones who benefit because of the more efficient allocation elsewhere).
japaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2015, 11:25
preecey
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swansea, Wales
Posts: 145
Nothing on O2 coverage widget about this.
That's because O2 updates their coverage data and maps less than once a month.

If it's a Cornerstone mast it's better just to use the Vodafone coverage checker. I find it's a lot more accurate and gets updated every Thursday without fail.
preecey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2015, 13:36
M1kos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 499
Excellent post Japaul thanks for the info
M1kos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2015, 14:36
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,683
Excellent post Japaul thanks for the info
Hey, what about my excellent question???
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2015, 14:41
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,683
Yes it does but there's a few things to bear in mind.

I think I've mentioned here before that when we talk of cell reselection priority it's relevant for idle mode only i.e. when you aren't doing anything the phone gets to decide which cell to camp on based on parameters like crp supplied by the network. In theory the network could serve up different parameters if it knew a cell was congested but you could argue why bother if you aren't doing anything.

Once you start doing something you shift to active or connected mode and the network takes over the decisions (based on measurements sent back by the phone) and changing cells becomes handover (network controlled) as opposed to reselection (handset controlled). Now there's the possibility of doing handover based load balancing to do what you are asking. However there are still drawbacks as handovers take quite a long time once you take into account measurements and the actual process itself. It also increases unreliability as any handover is an opportunity for data interruption or a call drop.

The best solution is for us all to be using carrier aggregation as you get really fast load balancing as part of the packet scheduler. Some dismiss CA because they deem the higher theoretical speeds unnecessary (including a few posts I've seen here) but it also provides capacity benefits separate from the extra spectrum used because of the efficient load balancing and so helps out the network and end users (including those who don't have CA capable phones who benefit because of the more efficient allocation elsewhere).
Thank you. as above, excellent answer. Very clear.
Yeah got the idle/active bit in your previous explanations.
So if a handset is on CA 2600/1800 and the 2600 or 1800 suddenly becomes crowded, the network can just kind of "seesaw" between them.
I know what I mean by that, kinda hoping you do!
Effectively leaning the connection more towards one side than the other dynamically which in turn means no handover shenanigans?
Suddenly CA makes sense!
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2015, 23:45
plymouthbloke1974
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Destination: Hard Brexit
Posts: 6,364
I think you might have missed the posts above yours!
But yeah, thanks, I forgot. Several O2 2G1800 sites in Plymouth I believe.
Yes. One in the Crownhill area I suspect
plymouthbloke1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2015, 13:33
Minardi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 502
Excellent info here, especially on CA. Very interesting.
Minardi is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:51.