Les me clear Peter Fecken Andre is one of the worst dancers ever to grace the SCD floor, its now obvious that BBC have stupidly paid him a lot of money and want to keep him in no matter how bad he is or how unfair it is to other better dancers.

I will be voting for Awful Andre this week and hope everybody else will to give the BBC what they want and sicken them as well.

I don't think that is Peters middle name jojoeno.

1. He's no where near the worst dancer they've ever had.

2. The BBC have no reason to want to keep him in - they pay him his fee regardless of how long he stays in for and if he's as unpopular as the vote suggests then he isn't exactly helping the ratings which are frankly excellent anyway.

3. He went out to Jamelia who has overall been worse than he has. The judges used their bias and a severe bending of the unspoken dance off 'rules' to keep him in. But frankly they've been biased since the start so nothing new there!

4. You have to be joking about voting for him right? That's utterly bonkers.

Jojoeno, are you can? If they want Andre to win they will have to do all the work themselves, I am not helping

Nah, you're alright

(Who's Sue Andre? Is she a cousin?)

He did not cast her yet.

No, although it could be 'brown nose' or ' 'Umble' ' or 'Uriah' or maybe 'King of The Jive'

As for voting to make sure he wins ... NEVER

No thank you OP.

I'll stick to voting for the couple I like the best.

"Can I just say....."


Fixed that for you.

If they had to pay him handsomely, in the (mistaken) belief that he'd be a great asset to the show, then they'd sure as hell want to get their money's worth - by hook or by crook.

Having watched the farce at weekend, I doubt Andre requires any votes to lift the Trophy?
The facts we know are,
The scores are not based on the dance performed
The contestants are judged on facial expression, not footwork or content
Certain contestants faults will be glossed over, or conveniently not noticed
The dance off is not actually judged on the dance off

As I have no doubt the winner is already decided, I will continue to vote, online for my choice, based on the dancing, and will not assist the BBC in anyway to fulfil their contract?
By encouraging votes for him, you are merely playing into their hands?

Great post
Seconded, thirded and fourthed

can I just say..........................

no, sorry, not voting for Andre

Bless. Did you get Richard Scarry's 'Big Book of Reverse Psychology' for your birthday?

People often do things to spite the judges. Although this is a new one. Spite the judges by doing what they want

It would be kinda hilarious if he did win though...I don't know what would be more amusing, this forum's reaction or Jamelia's?

why do you want to SUE him for was the jive really that bad ,
or is SUE in charge of Andre's media manipulation

or simply a typo for SUrE

As much as I would love Janette to win as she's one of my favourite pros and is getting more than her fair share of vitriol for things that are not her fault, no amount of money could bring me to vote for Peter Andre - few contestants in Strictly history have irritated me as much as he does!

How would that teach the BBC

All the judges wants Peter in the final cos then they'll have two Males and Two Females.
BBC is still under the impression that Peter is the biggest draw & star of the show.

I can not fathom the life of me work out how Peter winning wil be a slap in a face for those above

Good try OP but no cigar

Maybe that song Boy named Sue is about him.

I don't think I have heard that one Ivan.

I'm confidently , SUE that won't happen , 99% of the forum would get banned
for the eruptions if that happened

The only way to punish the producers for their obvious manipulation would be not to watch and not to vote.

No ta, I'll continue to vote for who I think danced best. Besides what lesson would the BBC learn if he won seeing as people think its fixed in his favour anyway?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOHPuY88Ry4