Sorry,but this proves nothing,it could be someone jumping on the bandwagon or not a Peter fan stirring the pot,also I don't believe half the comments I read on facebook most are posted for the effect they create.

This could be your mole, or who knows. it could well be someone even on this forum who wants to get in on all the drama. This proves noting as you do not even know if this person was in the audience.

From the video shown the audience stands up, even those in the balcony stand after the dance.

I just don't understand how re-shooting a standing ovation can still be called a 'standing ovation' when it isn't a spontaneous response to anything that has just concluded.

It's a faked ovation and leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

Could someone consult the studio log to find out how often standing ovations are faked because I would really like to know,

From what I could tell from the film the only part that might have been re recorded are shots of Peters wife,friends and family,mainly to get better shots of them,this is standard practice on some shows.I think Jamelia wanted to go out with bang and she's managed to do so,I think she put her on spin on what she saw or heard.For someone who claimed she would never do the show she sure has made her mark,got the money and the column inches.

Yay, a calm voice of reason. All this bickering has given me a clanging headache. Worse than the kids !!!

1. It's a telly show.
2. It's a shame Jamelia chose not to show the same spirit and dignity as the 4 dancers she had knocked out of the show .......

Great post but however some are still determined that it's a big conspiracy,and from memory.moles have been known to post incorrect information on results.

How can a standing ovation be reshot and still be called a standing ovation rather than a staged ovation that is in response to a prompt given by a floor manager rather than a dance that is just finished?

I would really like to know,

I found the F&F clapping a bit lacklustre. Almost as if it wasn't spontaneous. And I said this in another thread - to me Emily looks upset and as if she is crying. Perhaps she felt embarrassed and slightly humiliated for her husband, that he didnt get the repsonse they felt he deserved or expected - maybe all the apparent boos about the D.O decision were getting to her, too. She definitely doesn't look very happy or that she's enjoying herself much.

Oh my word, talk about projection!

She could also look upset as her husband was in the dance off and on the brink of being eliminated.

Well as so many keep on saying here - it's just a light entertainment dance show. Why look so upset? Hardly the end of the world.

Well then why look upset for any of the reasons you have implied either, the same thing applies.

Indeed! Here's what I think though. I think she looked upset cause he performed an absolutely dreadful jive with zero technique, that actually wasn't really a jive, and not in a billion light years worth 2 X 8, then he didn't get a spontaneous SO, and when the decision was made to let J go, the boos about that strange decision probably got to her a bit too.

I know you'll feel differently, so I'll leave you to it.

But you are projecting again and here's the thing, your timeline makes no sense, they refilmed their part of the SO BEFORE Jamelia was sent home, so she would not be upset about that.

If you watch the video without bias, you see that the audience did get to their feet, including those even on the balcony.

The whole standing ovation thing isn't a big deal for me, I think it's fair to say that this sort of stuff happens with recorded tv.

It's a nice deflection from what is the bigger issue though, and that is judging the dance off on 'anything' but the dance off.

It's happened before, and no doubt it will happen again - I recall Gabby Logan being totally robbed when in the bottom two with Penny Lancaster.

At least now the judges know they are going to have to tread more carefully in future, and fair play to the people that have raised the unfairnes of this particular dance off - The judges now know they are more accountable for their decisons than at any point in the past.

The slight but distinct differences in the armography of the post-dance hug, strongly suggest there were [at least] two takes from a point before the end of the dance. This makes this release worthless on its own, as the suspicion is that this is the staged version.

As per usual with these all too frequent beeb blunders, the initial cock-up is being made a 1000 times worse by the subsequent cover-up.

Well it happened with Simon and Pixie, she picked up two votes from the judges, when it was clear that on the dance off alone, Simon was by far the better dancer compared to Pixie's cha cha. She shouldn't of even got the two votes on that dance.

This may have asked and forgive me if it has, but can anyone make out anything that Peter says at the end of the clip on the blog?

Something like, that was good enough babe.

She seems pretty adamant, she also posted this,

yes, it does CLEARLY show it because it was RECORDED at the end at 10.45pm Saturday night so they could stick it on the end of his dance!!!!!!!!!!
Like · Reply · 6 · 5 hrs

So she says it was recorded right at the end of the night?

She has also been back on in the last hour.

I spoke to a friend yesterday who knew people who were in the audience. She said the ending of Peter's dance was re-shot and not just the standing ovation.
This seems weird especially as the director is saying they needed to clear the floor.

Why did the BBC have to take additional footage to fill the time it took to clear the floor?

It's a recorded programme, so they'd have been unnecessary, unless of course, they wanted to influence certain perceptions?

Why would they re-shoot the ending of a dance and how can that be fair or appropriate for a DO?

One of the reasons the BBC started promoting blogs, was because of the negativity expressed on their own "Points of View" message board by contributors, unlike the Points of View programme, where they can cherry picked the messages.
They were on record as saying that "Many opinions posted on the Points of View Board, weren't typical of those they received by phone, letter, or e-mail." (Well, "they would say that wouldn't they?")

With a blog, the blogger can choose which comments they want to include on it. err.. just like the Points of View TV programme. So I never bother with them.

Well at least you can switch this off and go offine . Unlike the kids . You dont have to stick around to risk a headache

Oh please .



That's how easy it is to mock up a statement to suit the debate .
I bet the audience has tripled in size since saturday night .