They wouldn't . Simple as that .
It would be impossible to to seamlessly splice a dance ending into the original take .And that posted blog vid is seamless . They simply asked the audience to repeat their original response to give the camera guys more shots while the prop team were clearing away all the props .

Did Neil Armstrong stand up?

When even the Daily Mail are taking the BBC's side over this maybe it's time to let the argument die?

Why did they NOT show the audience and judges reaction after Jamelia finished her DO.
Instead they went straight to a close up of Tess .

Well I would just like to say in the main part of the show he definitely did not get a standing ovation 😡 Still got the programe from Saturday night no OV 🙃

You have to bear in mind this completely recorded show is "constructed." It's a collation of different shots from different cameras, which are spliced together at the editing stage, long after the result is known.
"You might think they had an agenda when editing, given the judges' choice, but I couldn't possibly comment."

The SCD BLOG and link clearly shows Peter got a standing ovation in the DO. It's there for everyone to see, that's it, anyone who says anything else is not telling the truth.

Len who didn't vote for him in the DO said he improved but also the difference in scores was two points and two judges inc him score both Jamila and Peter the same it was that close.

Len made it clear in eleven years no one has ever told him how to score.

That was the fake retake.

It's not, please prove that allegation.

"Well he would say that, wouldn't he?"

They can put anything they want on a Blog.

The only "real" evidence is in the Saturday night programme and in the actual footage of the "Sunday," DO dances. The "reactions" can be edited to favour either. Odds are they'll be edited to reflect the judges choice. It's "telly" for cryin' out loud.


What's "cobbled together" for the Sunday show is the producer's choice of the total footage, which can be made to reflect their choice of what will be perceived by the viewers.

Only according to a handful of jammy supporters .
The rest of us are happy to see the back of her . Shame on her scrabbling in the mud and sacrificing what little dignity she had after the fat shaming scandal and her ridiculous behaviour on bear grylls , just because she "wanted to go out in a blaze of controversy" .
I can't believe I wasted sympathy votes on her .

I believe Jamelia's point in saying she knew she was going home after they re-shot the SO is, why did the producer want to emphasise the SO with the 4 judges sitting there, before they delivered their verdict .
It sends a message to the judges saying you can't possibly send him home when we're going to show the viewers how ecstatic the audience were about his DO .

Also why were we not shown any audience or judges reaction to Jamelia's DO .

It was either that or reshoot Len's Lens and get the old buffer to put some air quotes around his description of Jamilia's perfect running jete.

You spoke to a friend who knew someone who went, well I believe it now, this seems proof positive!

Well my aunt jane was there and she says
Oh wait , she wasn't there really, but dozens of celebs with twitter accounts and press with big mouths and a love of drama were . Yet not one has said that there was a do-over , or a man with a whip forcing them to stand and clap on pain of something or other. Just jammy and a mole .Or jammy the mole, whichever .
Such a bitter woman , very undignified .

it takes one to know one...

Oh, the irony.......

How ironic !

The mole mentioned it at the time of giving the result.

What a nasty distortion of reality.

In view of the 1st BiB, (which isn't true, btw) why would they need the 2nd BiB? There are cameras situated all over the place.

That is not proof though . It's just another opinion from someone somewhere, and of no more importance than any of the other reports from celebs and press people there who report nothing was amiss .
A mole getting the result correct doesn't elevate them to being absolutely right in their views on other things on the night . They are just humans with preferences and favourites and will report according to their point of view and potential desire to dump on any celeb they dislike . Whereas production cannot afford to try to manipulate anything when it is being personally witnessed by press and celebs all around them . Jammy is just a sore loser with inflated ideas of her own importance and a desire to be controversial .

Well I hope you've convinced yourself - me? nah!

I didn't need convincing , it's basic logic really and I fully comprehend how easy it is to start a rumour based on nothing but someone's opinion . Each to their own point of view though .

What does that mean though? That thy were mistaken at the time of giving the result, that is all.

You are settig your trust in someone who cannot be trusted with keeping the result to themselves for one whole day, a little ironic in truth.