|
||||||||
Week eight: Who should have been fired? |
| View Poll Results: Who should have been fired? | |||
| Charleine |
|
43 | 29.66% |
| David |
|
45 | 31.03% |
| Gary |
|
86 | 59.31% |
| Joseph |
|
11 | 7.59% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 145. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 900
|
Gary for being rubbish at planning events, which is his business plan; likewise Selina for being rubbish at what is, after all, her day job, if she'd not won.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,092
|
Quote:
Why does it have to be David - he performed better than Gary and the other two bought crap party bags, least he put himself forward as a ropes instructor (albeit a rather straightlaced one) and saved the team money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
Quote:
What did David do well? He made poor decisions, including with the party bags/glow sticks, and utterly failed with the t-shirts. He was also dull and cheesy for most of the kid's party. He had strong competition from Gary, but David performed worst.
Anyway, glow sticks at a daytime party are pointless. Gary was very keen on having them for some reason. David's main failure was the tee shirts, but that represented less than half the money the clients wanted refunded. Gary's total failure to reassure the clients about nuts was at least as big a factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,092
|
Quote:
Not putting the glowsticks into the party bag was irrelevant. It's hard to see how it became such a talking point in the boardroom. Anyway David had previously suggested doing it and they all agreed. It's not as if he did it on the spur of the moment.
Anyway, glow sticks at a daytime party are pointless. Gary was very keen on having them for some reason. David's main failure was the tee shirts, but that represented less than half the money the clients wanted refunded. Gary's total failure to reassure the clients about nuts was at least as big a factor. The nut situation was a mess, with Gary sharing responsibility with Charlene and Joseph. The t-shirts were all David. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 2,887
|
All 3 bar david he was the only one who tried to save the task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
Quote:
The bolded is the reason why it's relevant. The kids were having a crap, awkward time on the bus, so why would giving them glow sticks in broad daylight help the situation? Predictably, it fell flat. It made more sense to keep it in the party bag as was originally planned. So yes a poor decision, just dwarfed by his other failures.
The nut situation was a mess, with Gary sharing responsibility with Charlene and Joseph. The t-shirts were all David. David was stuck with printing the shirts and messed it up, but I doubt that cost was the most significant loss. We don't know the breakdown of refunds, but the nut alergy problem was probably the biggest factor in the parents' overall disatisfaction. The three responsible for the nut fiasco ganged up on David in the boardroom. Gary trying to make out that the glowsticks not being in the party bags was why the bags had to be sold at less than cost was notably pathetic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,764
|
I think there was a fair shout for either David or Gary going this week. David cost the group a lot of money, yet Gary's leadership was very weak and his miscommunication of the chocolate/nut situation created an element of mistrust between the team and the client. Plus they were both terrible at generating atmosphere. Joseph and Charleine may have made mistakes also, but they at least seemed to remember it was a children's party and not some kind of corporate team building exercise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,092
|
Quote:
I think choosing to buy glowsticks was a bigger error than handing them out at a bad time.
David was stuck with printing the shirts and messed it up, but I doubt that cost was the most significant loss. We don't know the breakdown of refunds, but the nut alergy problem was probably the biggest factor in the parents' overall disatisfaction. The three responsible for the nut fiasco ganged up on David in the boardroom. Gary trying to make out that the glowsticks not being in the party bags was why the bags had to be sold at less than cost was notably pathetic. Exactly how much the nut situation cost them is unquantifiable, but we do know that David's t-shirt fiasco resulted in a £175 loss. That is very significant. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20.


