|
||||||||
Should albums be listened to as albums |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In England
Posts: 4,349
|
Should albums be listened to as albums
yes says me
![]() one of the (many) things that bugs me about the modern listener - that's you is this cherry picking thing they do, sending songs up the singles chart from brand new albums. The first problem with this is the instant judgement factor.... a good song reveals itself slowly as we all should know. The second problem is an album should be listened to as an album, that's why the songs are sequenced as they are, so you get a rise and fall and an overall experience. Some of what i consider classic albums have a scope and variety about them that would be lost if i cherry picked the songs i liked best, in fact i can think of one or two albums that have no more than a couple of songs on i would listen to in isolation, but work brilliantly as an album. imo to cherry pick songs from albums is like selecting only your favourite scenes from a film to watch over and over...they won't make any sense without the other scenes. It's a nonsense...so stop it!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,789
|
I think it depends on the album, these days some albums are made to be cherry picked, with artists making half the album good with potential singles and the other half padded with filler just to make up the numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In England
Posts: 4,349
|
Quote:
I think it depends on the album, these days some albums are made to be cherry picked, with artists making half the album good with potential singles and the other half padded with filler just to make up the numbers.
are those responsible for those albums responding to listeners habits or visa versa? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 815
|
For the most point I tend to agree, although some of my favourrite albums have a skip track (sometimes that's because they have weird crap like Revolution #9, Fitter Happier, Hey Foxymophandlemama That's Me on them).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In England
Posts: 4,349
|
Quote:
For the most point I tend to agree, although some of my favourrite albums have a skip track (sometimes that's because they have weird crap like Revolution #9, Fitter Happier, Hey Foxymophandlemama That's Me on them).
Though there are exceptions i'll give you that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,507
|
I think it depends on the album. For example, Beyoncé's last album was made as a whole and was a body of work. She made videos for every single song on the album and it was mean to be viewed/listened to as a whole. It was frustrating hearing people say that there was no Halo, no Single Ladies etc and that she didn't have any big singles from the album...she wasn't actually bothered about singles...the whole point was that it was a body of work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,597
|
I never skip tracks except occasionally on compilation albums. I have one compilation (Soul Devotion) which is my go to album to listen to on my PMP when I haven't the time or inclination to play anything else but to fill in and that is on permanent full album repeat and get a track or two at each listen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,287
|
Well in a way it's a return to what albums were originally meant to be which is collections of singles. Indeed, that is why they are called albums. In their original form they bore a physical resemblance to picture and photo albums.
The length of albums were originally dictated to by technology not by aesthetics. It's with the concept or thematic album which was popularised by The Beatles and many artists after them that this newer idea emerged. Still it is amazing how persistent the idea of the 10-12 song albums of 3/4 minutes songs has been. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North-West England
Posts: 25,885
|
From time immemorial, many albums have included a few good tracks and a lot of filler.
I've albums going back decades where I've only listened to some of the tracks once and rarely a whole side in one go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 9,446
|
Quote:
yes says me
![]() one of the (many) things that bugs me about the modern listener - that's you is this cherry picking thing they do, sending songs up the singles chart from brand new albums. The first problem with this is the instant judgement factor.... a good song reveals itself slowly as we all should know. I'd have thought that in the vast majority of cases, it's the strength of the singles that drive album sales, not the other way around, because once you've bought the album, you're un-likely to buy individual tracks from it again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,725
|
I pretty much only listen to albums. I've no artists on my iPod where I've only got an odd song. Quote:
all albums have a skip track it's true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ignoringtrollsville
Posts: 7,875
|
Of course they should be imo. I guess the inexorable rise of digital music has had a few detrimental consequences, one of the main ones being it's too easy not to pay for an artists' work anymore if that's the way you are wired (I'm not).
Another one is we've all become so impatient in our listening habits due to the fact that we can get to a 'favourite' track so easily. Then programme the CD player/whatever to skip to that track every time afterwards! I'm encouraged about the vinyl rennaissance personally because it makes this sort of jiggery pokery very difficult. Put it on the turntable, turn the amp on, sit back and LISTEN. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,773
|
skipping a track on an album is a bit like skipping a chapter of a book. Concept albums in particular are they kind of album that you shouldn't really skip a track on but even regular albums are put together in a certain way, they son't just randomly put tracks in order, they're placed carefully so as to create light and shade. It's going to be a very poring album if every song on it was in common time and 100 BPM
When we were putting our album together we were originally going to start it with a bang and hit people between the eyes with a furious opening track, then we came up with the idea that rather than that, we'd make them listen and turn up the volume by starting the album with a track that opens acapella and gradually builds. We also came up with the idea of forming the album around the old vinyl format of having 2 sides, with a break in the middle where the listener would have had to turn the record over to play side 2 . If people pick odd tracks from the album to listen to, you certainly wouldn't get the feeling of listening to an old vinyl album, so ours needs to be listened to in its entirety, ideally |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,410
|
Quote:
I pretty much only listen to albums. I've no artists on my iPod where I've only got an odd song.
That's not true at all. If I'm driving then I will usually have my memory stick on random because I can then listen without worrying about changing albums, etc. At home though, because I listen to a lot of Progressive Music where the artist usually intends for an album to be listened to in its entirety, I play the whole album. ![]() I've also got plenty of albums that contain no 'fillers'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,287
|
Quote:
skipping a track on an album is a bit like skipping a chapter of a book. Concept albums in particular are they kind of album that you shouldn't really skip a track on but even regular albums are put together in a certain way, they son't just randomly put tracks in order, they're placed carefully so as to create light and shade. It's going to be a very poring album if every song on it was in common time and 100 BPM
Quote:
When we were putting our album together we were originally going to start it with a bang and hit people between the eyes with a furious opening track, then we came up with the idea that rather than that, we'd make them listen and turn up the volume by starting the album with a track that opens acapella and gradually builds. We also came up with the idea of forming the album around the old vinyl format of having 2 sides, with a break in the middle where the listener would have had to turn the record over to play side 2
Quote:
If people pick odd tracks from the album to listen to, you certainly wouldn't get the feeling of listening to an old vinyl album, so ours needs to be listened to in its entirety, ideally
There are some very old-fashioned listeners on here. I read so many posts on here asking people to be less conservative in their listening, i.e. they should go and listen to music outside the charts etc. Well some listeners should stop harking back to older listening patterns and embrace the possibilities of the new technologies. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
|
I treat albums like a whole product. I listen and appreciate it as a whole. I don't buy an album only to listen to the singles or just to cherry pick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,773
|
Quote:
Albums are more often like books of short stories rather than novels. Concept Albums might be more like novels. Long tracks are hard to skip.
Artists may wish to curate their works in a certain order and that's fine but digital music services represent a disruption which favours the listener to some degree. But when you are listening via a streaming service the listener can curate their own listening order which is quite unlike vinyl. The listening can put together playlists that actually sound better than the artists original choices. There are some very old-fashioned listeners on here. I read so many posts on here asking people to be less conservative in their listening, i.e. they should go and listen to music outside the charts etc. Well some listeners should stop harking back to older listening patterns and embrace the possibilities of the new technologies. It's not a case of not embracing new technology, it's a case of putting together a set of songs which, when presented in order take the listener on a journey, if you choose to listen to a whole album on shuffle or just pick certain songs, you can't follow that journey. Fair enough you might create your own journey but it won't be the right one for that particular set of songs. That's why I only own one "best of" album, to me, they don't create that journey |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,221
|
I guess it depends on the type(s) of music you're into. I nearly always cherry pick songs, but then I mostly listen to pop/dance/R&B/electronic music.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 🖥⌨🖱
Posts: 29,255
|
When I was buying a lot of music I would have loved the option to just buy the tracks I liked.
Back in those vinyl days, after I got an 'LP' I'd play it through 2 or 3 times to really decide what I liked and what I didn't...and then record the good tracks onto compilation cassette tapes. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,181
|
I like to listen to albums as a whole mostly but I find that so many modern albums are packed to the brim with filler and have like 17 relatively unconnected tracks rather than being a coherent body of work like the albums that I love.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wolf359
Posts: 96,804
|
On the whole, I like to listen to an album as a whole album and in the order the artist intended the songs to be heard.
Most albums I like have a feel to them that is enhanced by listening to them as a whole. They often take you on a journey, that gets lost if you don't listen to them in order. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,287
|
Quote:
what makes you think you know better than the artist what order of songs works? The running order of an album is almost as important as the creating of the songs themselves, certainly when you've got an album that tells a story.
It's not a case of not embracing new technology, it's a case of putting together a set of songs which, when presented in order take the listener on a journey, if you choose to listen to a whole album on shuffle or just pick certain songs, you can't follow that journey. Fair enough you might create your own journey but it won't be the right one for that particular set of songs. That's why I only own one "best of" album, to me, they don't create that journey Sure there are some albums that have a strong narrative but that's relatively rare. Most albums are collections of songs. More often the songs are not written in the order they are recorded. There will often be more songs available than can be put on an album. And often it's not just the artist who chooses the order. Many will take the advice of others, producers, etc. It's an art in itself putting together a running order, an experience. What makes an artist (which might be a set of opinions anyway if it is a group) better at that than someone who's listened to lots of music? Often it is the artists own experience of listening that is informing their choices anyway. An example. You mention having one 'best of' album I hope that Best of album is Abba Gold because that album demonstrates how a set of singles/songs can be recurated, including tracks that weren't really best of, and a listening experience recreated that actually helped re-establish ABBA as great artists in popular music. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12,979
|
Quote:
From time immemorial, many albums have included a few good tracks and a lot of filler.
I've albums going back decades where I've only listened to some of the tracks once and rarely a whole side in one go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12,979
|
Quote:
what makes you think you know better than the artist what order of songs works? The running order of an album is almost as important as the creating of the songs themselves, certainly when you've got an album that tells a story.
It's not a case of not embracing new technology, it's a case of putting together a set of songs which, when presented in order take the listener on a journey, if you choose to listen to a whole album on shuffle or just pick certain songs, you can't follow that journey. Fair enough you might create your own journey but it won't be the right one for that particular set of songs. That's why I only own one "best of" album, to me, they don't create that journey |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,773
|
Quote:
Sorry, but this "journey" stuff is total bollox as far as I'm concerned. Every album is a collection of songs to me. Nothing else. I own loads of best of collections.
If lyrics are included in the sleeve notes I'll read them before I listen to the album, but as I said, lyrics are important to me |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:03.



is this cherry picking thing they do, sending songs up the singles chart from brand new albums. 

Though there are exceptions i'll give you that.