Originally Posted by vixj83:
“I actually don't know what to think about this act of Duncan's. I was taken aback when I saw it, and found it very uncomfortable to watch. I realised it did not sit right with me, I grasped the Kenny Everett thing but the Walliams thing has just clicked. IF this was more innocent than it appears, which it may well be (him plucking a well known phrase that mocks her title as well as a well known impersonation of a 'lady' and putting them together) then I think it was poorly chosen and unfortunate. I really can't decide if he meant it quite as blatantly as it came out. I don't think I can let myself believe he would do that on TV but it certainly appears as discriminatory. I try not to overthink these things but I was open mouthed watching that unfold.”
“I actually don't know what to think about this act of Duncan's. I was taken aback when I saw it, and found it very uncomfortable to watch. I realised it did not sit right with me, I grasped the Kenny Everett thing but the Walliams thing has just clicked. IF this was more innocent than it appears, which it may well be (him plucking a well known phrase that mocks her title as well as a well known impersonation of a 'lady' and putting them together) then I think it was poorly chosen and unfortunate. I really can't decide if he meant it quite as blatantly as it came out. I don't think I can let myself believe he would do that on TV but it certainly appears as discriminatory. I try not to overthink these things but I was open mouthed watching that unfold.”
I personally think it was innocent from Duncan, but it did make me wince a bit.
Duncan is a super wealthy and successful entrepreneur, but he has (to me at least) come across as a surprisingly blunt and ignorant tool in this series.
I don't like him anymore....but I think this was just an innocent joke, albeit from an ignorant man (although, I use that word, only in the biological sense).




”
unlike Duncan and am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.