Originally Posted by viva.espana:
“Agree. And if you look at the background to this, so many of his and Lady C's clashes have centred around her saying she's a lady (as in, she's cultured, has standards, morals etc) and him saying no lady would behave in the way she does. It's always been about behaviour, not sexuality. And because the 'lady' word gets bandied about so much between them, I think his mind just went to the Walliams' character's 'laydeee' catch-phrase, and he added his own 'comedy' with the coarse Everett leg cross to qualify his 'unladylike' sneer at her.
That's how I see it anyway.”
“Agree. And if you look at the background to this, so many of his and Lady C's clashes have centred around her saying she's a lady (as in, she's cultured, has standards, morals etc) and him saying no lady would behave in the way she does. It's always been about behaviour, not sexuality. And because the 'lady' word gets bandied about so much between them, I think his mind just went to the Walliams' character's 'laydeee' catch-phrase, and he added his own 'comedy' with the coarse Everett leg cross to qualify his 'unladylike' sneer at her.
That's how I see it anyway.”
That's my take on it also, it wasn't homophobic based.







I don't believe Duncan did consciously mean offence in the way it has been described on here and I have already said that. Even in my reply to you I said I didn't think it definitely meant that. I just pointed out that because your girlfriend says it in the way you described that doesn't mean Duncan didn't mean offence by it, the situations aren't comparable. That is all