|
||||||||
This is Most Definitely Not An Appreciation Thread - Part 23 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#12726 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,240
|
I think the idea of re-writing the question cards is a great one.
I'll start - Considering she's a attractive woman, how do you think Tess manages to come dressed as a pantomime dame who's been at the bargain basement "party rejects" bin every week? Next... |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#12727 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,225
|
Quote:
The problem with RR rewriting the questions is each one would finish with "wouldn't you say, Oksana?" which would make no sense when the other couples are being questioned.
Unless she pops up in each interview like a dancing gooseberry - I wouldn't mind that. ![]() Robert is happy and smug, Anton and Brendan are killing themselves laughing, Claudia plays up to it and just ends every sentence she says with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" and Tess cannot work out what's going on because she never picks up the new cards anyway - she's still working off her script from the very first show she ever did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12728 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
"So, in all seriousness, what do you think of dancing your Waltz to Sex Bomb this week?"
(Though in fairness someone, think it may have been Gethin, touched on music choices this week. Think it may have been with Judge Rinder and Oksana.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12729 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
Ok but that would be amazing, especially if she had no idea what was happening. Every interview Claudia does tonight, all her questions end with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" Doesn't matter who she's interviewing. Meanwhile the other couples are getting increasingly confused and have no idea if they're meant to be answering or not. Oksana keeps being pushed to the front of the area so she can answer questions so basically she ends up being the interviewer because she has to pass every question back to the couple being interviewed.
Robert is happy and smug, Anton and Brendan are killing themselves laughing, Claudia plays up to it and just ends every sentence she says with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" and Tess cannot work out what's going on because she never picks up the new cards anyway - she's still working off her script from the very first show she ever did. ![]() Wouldn't you say, Oksana? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12730 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,225
|
Quote:
excellent.I think Danny could get away with it as well. He has definite snerk going on and I'd love to see the questions Oti could come up with ![]() 1) On a scale of 1 -10 how much do you think Danny and I deserve to win this series? 2) On a scale of 1 -10 how good an idea do you think it is to beat me to the glitterball this year? 3) Considering your answers to questions to 1 and 2, do you really want to win Strictly this year? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12731 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
Oti's questions:
1) On a scale of 1 -10 how much do you think Danny and I deserve to win this series? 2) On a scale of 1 -10 how good an idea do you think it is to beat me to the glitterball this year? 3) Considering your answers to questions to 1 and 2, do you really want to win Strictly this year? Wouldn't you say, Oksana? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12732 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
"So, in all seriousness, what do you think of dancing your Waltz to Sex Bomb this week?"
(Though in fairness someone, think it may have been Gethin, touched on music choices this week. Think it may have been with Judge Rinder and Oksana.) Yes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12733 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,240
|
Quote:
Oti's questions:
1) On a scale of 1 -10 how much do you think Danny and I deserve to win this series? 2) On a scale of 1 -10 how good an idea do you think it is to beat me to the glitterball this year? 3) Considering your answers to questions to 1 and 2, do you really want to win Strictly this year? When answering the following, please bear in mind that I have sharpened this stiletto heel and fully intend to use it should the occasion arise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12734 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
<channels Rob>
Yes. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12735 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Out on a limb
Posts: 3,090
|
Quote:
We already have sweetie but brave aggs is still there. Perhaps Bognor could become a new HQ?
Now there's a thought. Do I need to send the helicopter for you? Making slow progress, my fault, Richard Arnold was on his way to visit Erin when he offered to help row, neither rowing or navigation being his forte a crate has been opened, progress slowed but more enjoyable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12736 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
Ok but that would be amazing, especially if she had no idea what was happening. Every interview Claudia does tonight, all her questions end with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" Doesn't matter who she's interviewing. Meanwhile the other couples are getting increasingly confused and have no idea if they're meant to be answering or not. Oksana keeps being pushed to the front of the area so she can answer questions so basically she ends up being the interviewer because she has to pass every question back to the couple being interviewed.
Robert is happy and smug, Anton and Brendan are killing themselves laughing, Claudia plays up to it and just ends every sentence she says with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" and Tess cannot work out what's going on because she never picks up the new cards anyway - she's still working off her script from the very first show she ever did. Stuff Blackpool, this is the Oksana edition! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12737 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Out on a limb
Posts: 3,090
|
Instead of Lens Lens we could have 'What would Oksana say?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12738 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In my shell
Posts: 3,178
|
Quote:
Totally unappreciating that because of some humourless sods I had to trawl through the utter crap that ITT has descended into to find out what Bobby Rinder did or said that was so bad some folks seem to believe he should be taken out and shot - it was funny for FFS - I blame all this on Trump and his addle-brained supporters.
Buggers off to Erin Island sans entourage but with crates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12739 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
Instead of Lens Lens we could have 'What would Oksana say?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12740 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Out on a limb
Posts: 3,090
|
Quote:
Ditto. Raspberry cider pour moi - thanks Sofs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12741 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
Thing is if the NAT starts to point at other threads and posters >>>> out there then they will come in and defend their opinions . I used to post in the NAT a lot when it was simple fun and sarky comments on the show / dresses / props etc .Once it got personal I felt it best not to join in if I am honest .
IMO if we have an issue with a thread or post or posts then by all means question them on that thread , or have a discussion out there .But it was never the trend on the NAT to unappreciate others opinions in here and snigger about it . In doing so then posters will come and defend themselves in here . Just my opinion Ed staying or going isn't the issue for me, it's how it's handled and at the minute we seem to be careering full steam ahead into a Series 6 situation, which isn't good for anyone and never makes for a benign series. I think we need to have all the irreverence we can muster, personally. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12742 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,052
|
Quote:
Just occasionally I like it when the celebs show sparks of their real selves not the PR, staged, all chums together and bestest thing ever-Iness off it. If they also respond to my shouted at the tele instructions, so much the better.
<super villain hand movements> Tristan, Aliona come back. 😭 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12743 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,240
|
Unappreciation is the order of the day in here but personally, I unappreciate unappreciation without a little tongue in cheek (I'm kinky like that).
Simple unappreciation can often come across a merely whinging and while I can whinge with the best of them, I think it's out of place in here without a little sarcasm (or something akin) attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12744 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
I don't think it's so much a problem with the NAT as the the show as whole, it seems to have gone terribly po-faced and - for all the Mexican dancing bands - rather humourless. It seems any comment that isn't in total praise of the wonderfullness of absolutely everything and everyone is jumped on until the squishy bits come out.
Ed staying or going isn't the issue for me, it's how it's handled and at the minute we seem to be careering full steam ahead into a Series 6 situation, which isn't good for anyone and never makes for a benign series. I think we need to have all the irreverence we can muster, personally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12745 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,110
|
Quote:
I think we need to have all the irreverence we can muster, personally. It is the understanding of that word - IRREVERENCE - which is the ultimate DOT word really - that is in jeopardy here. Po-faced and pontification are really not quite the same thing. Howl for the helicopter if you need it aggs! Always on standby! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12746 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
Me too! A good snark is good for the soul! we need some snarky pros back! It's quite something when you have to look to the celebs for snarkiness
Tristan, Aliona come back. 😭 Too far? Can I just unappreciate (this is a real whinge so sorry people) that I'm going to miss the show live tonight so will have to catch up later?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12747 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
Indeed. Spot on as usual.
It is the understanding of that word - IRREVERENCE - which is the ultimate DOT word really - that is in jeopardy here. Po-faced and pontification are really not quite the same thing. Howl for the helicopter if you need it aggs! Always on standby! Does it involve Shemar in a pilots uniform - in which case hitching a lift 👍
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12748 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13,160
|
Quote:
Me too! A good snark is good for the soul! we need some snarky pros back! It's quite something when you have to look to the celebs for snarkiness
Tristan, Aliona come back. 😭 His hair, on the other hand, can be mean 🦁 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12749 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,656
|
Quote:
Just occasionally I like it when the celebs show sparks of their real selves not the PR, staged, all chums together and bestest thing ever-Iness off it. If they also respond to my shouted at the tele instructions, so much the better.
<super villain hand movements> ![]() Quote:
What you're basically saying is they should have got a white cat for RR to stroke at the same time?
![]() I nearly put 'pussy' but relented. You should all be proud of me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12750 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,439
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29.






