• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
This is Most Definitely Not An Appreciation Thread - Part 23
<<
<
510 of 674
>>
>
tabithakitten
19-11-2016
I think the idea of re-writing the question cards is a great one.

I'll start -

Considering she's a attractive woman, how do you think Tess manages to come dressed as a pantomime dame who's been at the bargain basement "party rejects" bin every week?

Next...
franglemand
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“The problem with RR rewriting the questions is each one would finish with "wouldn't you say, Oksana?" which would make no sense when the other couples are being questioned.

Unless she pops up in each interview like a dancing gooseberry - I wouldn't mind that. ”

Ok but that would be amazing, especially if she had no idea what was happening. Every interview Claudia does tonight, all her questions end with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" Doesn't matter who she's interviewing. Meanwhile the other couples are getting increasingly confused and have no idea if they're meant to be answering or not. Oksana keeps being pushed to the front of the area so she can answer questions so basically she ends up being the interviewer because she has to pass every question back to the couple being interviewed.

Robert is happy and smug, Anton and Brendan are killing themselves laughing, Claudia plays up to it and just ends every sentence she says with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" and Tess cannot work out what's going on because she never picks up the new cards anyway - she's still working off her script from the very first show she ever did.
Fudd
19-11-2016
"So, in all seriousness, what do you think of dancing your Waltz to Sex Bomb this week?"

(Though in fairness someone, think it may have been Gethin, touched on music choices this week. Think it may have been with Judge Rinder and Oksana.)
Fudd
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by franglemand:
“Ok but that would be amazing, especially if she had no idea what was happening. Every interview Claudia does tonight, all her questions end with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" Doesn't matter who she's interviewing. Meanwhile the other couples are getting increasingly confused and have no idea if they're meant to be answering or not. Oksana keeps being pushed to the front of the area so she can answer questions so basically she ends up being the interviewer because she has to pass every question back to the couple being interviewed.

Robert is happy and smug, Anton and Brendan are killing themselves laughing, Claudia plays up to it and just ends every sentence she says with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" and Tess cannot work out what's going on because she never picks up the new cards anyway - she's still working off her script from the very first show she ever did.”

That woulld be brilliant.

Wouldn't you say, Oksana?
franglemand
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“ excellent.
I think Danny could get away with it as well.
He has definite snerk going on and I'd love to see the questions Oti could come up with ”

Oti's questions:
1) On a scale of 1 -10 how much do you think Danny and I deserve to win this series?
2) On a scale of 1 -10 how good an idea do you think it is to beat me to the glitterball this year?
3) Considering your answers to questions to 1 and 2, do you really want to win Strictly this year?
Fudd
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by franglemand:
“Oti's questions:
1) On a scale of 1 -10 how much do you think Danny and I deserve to win this series?
2) On a scale of 1 -10 how good an idea do you think it is to beat me to the glitterball this year?
3) Considering your answers to questions to 1 and 2, do you really want to win Strictly this year?”

4) Consider your answers to questions 1, 2 and 3 again whilst pondering whether you whether want to see Christmas in on a drip. Now, question one again...

Wouldn't you say, Oksana?
aggs
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“"So, in all seriousness, what do you think of dancing your Waltz to Sex Bomb this week?"

(Though in fairness someone, think it may have been Gethin, touched on music choices this week. Think it may have been with Judge Rinder and Oksana.)”

<channels Rob>

Yes.
tabithakitten
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by franglemand:
“Oti's questions:
1) On a scale of 1 -10 how much do you think Danny and I deserve to win this series?
2) On a scale of 1 -10 how good an idea do you think it is to beat me to the glitterball this year?
3) Considering your answers to questions to 1 and 2, do you really want to win Strictly this year?”

And as an opener to said questions,

When answering the following, please bear in mind that I have sharpened this stiletto heel and fully intend to use it should the occasion arise.
Fudd
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“<channels Rob>

Yes.”

Be fair, his answers did acknowledge the question. He'd more likely respond with 'Good'.
kassieq
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by sofakat:
“We already have sweetie but brave aggs is still there. Perhaps Bognor could become a new HQ?

Now there's a thought.

Do I need to send the helicopter for you?”

Oh thanks sweetie, much appreciated.

Making slow progress, my fault, Richard Arnold was on his way to visit Erin when he offered to help row, neither rowing or navigation being his forte a crate has been opened, progress slowed but more enjoyable.
Fudd
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by franglemand:
“Ok but that would be amazing, especially if she had no idea what was happening. Every interview Claudia does tonight, all her questions end with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" Doesn't matter who she's interviewing. Meanwhile the other couples are getting increasingly confused and have no idea if they're meant to be answering or not. Oksana keeps being pushed to the front of the area so she can answer questions so basically she ends up being the interviewer because she has to pass every question back to the couple being interviewed.

Robert is happy and smug, Anton and Brendan are killing themselves laughing, Claudia plays up to it and just ends every sentence she says with "wouldn't you say Oksana?" and Tess cannot work out what's going on because she never picks up the new cards anyway - she's still working off her script from the very first show she ever did.”

Going back to this - no, they have to give the new cards to Tess and insists she reads them, even by threatening to give Vernon a new phone with unlimited texts to force her. Because that approach with the judging panel would be even better... the judges all sitting there with confused expressions on their faces as Oksana states what she thinks about the dance - four times over - before scurrying upstairs to speak for the couples as well.

Stuff Blackpool, this is the Oksana edition!
kassieq
19-11-2016
Instead of Lens Lens we could have 'What would Oksana say?"
tortoiseperson
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by kassieq:
“Totally unappreciating that because of some humourless sods I had to trawl through the utter crap that ITT has descended into to find out what Bobby Rinder did or said that was so bad some folks seem to believe he should be taken out and shot - it was funny for FFS - I blame all this on Trump and his addle-brained supporters.

Buggers off to Erin Island sans entourage but with crates.”

Ditto. Raspberry cider pour moi - thanks Sofs!
aggs
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by kassieq:
“Instead of Lens Lens we could have 'What would Oksana say?"”

Oksana's <camera> obscura.
kassieq
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by tortoiseperson:
“Ditto. Raspberry cider pour moi - thanks Sofs!”

Originally Posted by aggs:
“Oksana's <camera> obscura.”

aggs
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by duckylucky:
“Thing is if the NAT starts to point at other threads and posters >>>> out there then they will come in and defend their opinions . I used to post in the NAT a lot when it was simple fun and sarky comments on the show / dresses / props etc .Once it got personal I felt it best not to join in if I am honest .
IMO if we have an issue with a thread or post or posts then by all means question them on that thread , or have a discussion out there .But it was never the trend on the NAT to unappreciate others opinions in here and snigger about it . In doing so then posters will come and defend themselves in here . Just my opinion”

I don't think it's so much a problem with the NAT as the the show as whole, it seems to have gone terribly po-faced and - for all the Mexican dancing bands - rather humourless. It seems any comment that isn't in total praise of the wonderfullness of absolutely everything and everyone is jumped on until the squishy bits come out.

Ed staying or going isn't the issue for me, it's how it's handled and at the minute we seem to be careering full steam ahead into a Series 6 situation, which isn't good for anyone and never makes for a benign series.

I think we need to have all the irreverence we can muster, personally.
BMLisa
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“Just occasionally I like it when the celebs show sparks of their real selves not the PR, staged, all chums together and bestest thing ever-Iness off it. If they also respond to my shouted at the tele instructions, so much the better.
<super villain hand movements>”

Me too! A good snark is good for the soul! we need some snarky pros back! It's quite something when you have to look to the celebs for snarkiness

Tristan, Aliona come back. 😭
tabithakitten
19-11-2016
Unappreciation is the order of the day in here but personally, I unappreciate unappreciation without a little tongue in cheek (I'm kinky like that).

Simple unappreciation can often come across a merely whinging and while I can whinge with the best of them, I think it's out of place in here without a little sarcasm (or something akin) attached.
Fudd
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“I don't think it's so much a problem with the NAT as the the show as whole, it seems to have gone terribly po-faced and - for all the Mexican dancing bands - rather humourless. It seems any comment that isn't in total praise of the wonderfullness of absolutely everything and everyone is jumped on until the squishy bits come out.

Ed staying or going isn't the issue for me, it's how it's handled and at the minute we seem to be careering full steam ahead into a Series 6 situation, which isn't good for anyone and never makes for a benign series.

I think we need to have all the irreverence we can muster, personally.”

I loved Series 6 semi final night though; everyone on here being able to do the maths and realise the issue straight away whilst the BBC blundered on regardless and had to do a backtrack during the results.
sofakat
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“
I think we need to have all the irreverence we can muster, personally.”

Indeed. Spot on as usual.

It is the understanding of that word - IRREVERENCE - which is the ultimate DOT word really - that is in jeopardy here.

Po-faced and pontification are really not quite the same thing.

Howl for the helicopter if you need it aggs! Always on standby!
Fudd
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by BMLisa:
“Me too! A good snark is good for the soul! we need some snarky pros back! It's quite something when you have to look to the celebs for snarkiness

Tristan, Aliona come back. 😭”

Come back James!!!

Too far?

Can I just unappreciate (this is a real whinge so sorry people) that I'm going to miss the show live tonight so will have to catch up later?
aggs
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by sofakat:
“Indeed. Spot on as usual.

It is the understanding of that word - IRREVERENCE - which is the ultimate DOT word really - that is in jeopardy here.

Po-faced and pontification are really not quite the same thing.

Howl for the helicopter if you need it aggs! Always on standby!”

😘😘 thank you hunni.
Does it involve Shemar in a pilots uniform - in which case hitching a lift 👍
aggs
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by BMLisa:
“Me too! A good snark is good for the soul! we need some snarky pros back! It's quite something when you have to look to the celebs for snarkiness

Tristan, Aliona come back. 😭”

I don't think TTF could snerk if his hair depended on it.
His hair, on the other hand, can be mean 🦁
Tejas
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“Just occasionally I like it when the celebs show sparks of their real selves not the PR, staged, all chums together and bestest thing ever-Iness off it. If they also respond to my shouted at the tele instructions, so much the better.
<super villain hand movements>”

I love this stuff as well. Like Jamelia & Tristan on ITT last year - TV gold.

Originally Posted by Fudd:
“What you're basically saying is they should have got a white cat for RR to stroke at the same time?

I nearly put 'pussy' but relented. You should all be proud of me.”

Judge had a case on his TV show yesterday about someone who had paid a vet bill for a cat they were looking after for someone else... he nearly managed to get through the show without using the word pussy.
kaycee
19-11-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“Oksana's <camera> obscura.”

LOL Clever
<<
<
510 of 674
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map