|
||||||||
How does on train wifi work? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,448
|
How does on train wifi work?
I've always wondered this. When I'm on a train, I can barely get a mobile signal most of the time, and obviously not at all in a tunnels.
How does wifi manage to work? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 720
|
It will still mostly be over 3G / 4G networks (although I think some uses satellite aswell, I may be wrong on that though).
However there are a couple of differences compared to your mobile: 1 - There isn't the restriction on size / other features that exists when it comes to mobile phones. So the hardware that contains the antenna etc can be much larger and better designed to pick up signal where your mobile probably wouldn't 2 - Mainly newer trains (especially the Voyager family) seem to act like mini Faraday cages, blocking a lot of the signal from even entering the train. As the hardware on the train can be outside on the roof etc, it isn't affected by this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,683
|
Yeah i believe it is something like the media use (like when they were sending live feeds from the moving election campaign busses).
They have a system that can switch between or merge the various 3G/4G networks on the fly. Also, as was said, the antenna will be outside the train and as big as it needs to be for very good reception. Bit like how my Huawei router gets a much better signal than my phone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,448
|
What about tunnels? Do they have repeaters in there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 868
|
It doesn't. Or, it didn't when I tried it the other week anyway!
Furthermore EE's signal couldn't seem to keep up with the speed of the train despite it apparently being "mobile enhanced" (not sure what that is) - 5 bars of actual signal but no throughput (on either phone or osprey hotspot) unless the train was stationary. I spent a disappointingly boring 3.5 hours! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
What about tunnels? Do they have repeaters in there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,288
|
Quote:
The Channel Tunnel has repeaters IIRC, at least for the French networks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 660
|
Quote:
If I recall correctly one bore of the Channel Tunnel carries the (some?) English mobile signals while the other carries French!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,541
|
Quote:
What about tunnels? Do they have repeaters in there?
The BBC used the same technology when they did the Olympics torch coverage online, they broadcast video of the torch from a vehicle as it travelled all over the country. EE even sell a service specifically for broadcasters with 4G that is prioritised traffic I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,294
|
Trains like the Pendolino in operation on the West Coast Mainline are truly shocking for signal. However for the internal Wifi they use big antennas, still shocking, I can't remember who they use now but Virgin used to use T-Mobile/EE and it would barely give any speed for the vast majority of the journey, they used to have maps showing on the line map where they expected good service and slow service and no service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
You should get signal from one of the networks bouncing in through the tunnel opening surely? most tunnels aren't that long.
Quote:
Trains like the Pendolino in operation on the West Coast Mainline are truly shocking for signal. However for the internal Wifi they use big antennas, still shocking, I can't remember who they use now but Virgin used to use T-Mobile/EE and it would barely give any speed for the vast majority of the journey, they used to have maps showing on the line map where they expected good service and slow service and no service.
Virgin used to have on board amplifiers for certain networks. Orange may have been one of them? I'd guess it depends on the generation of equipment. I've used FGW Wifi and it's been okay - and as it is brand new it likely has LTE and even satellite capability. Don't expect to stream video though, as they use traffic management to stop it |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 502
|
Quote:
Trains like the Pendolino in operation on the West Coast Mainline are truly shocking for signal. However for the internal Wifi they use big antennas, still shocking, I can't remember who they use now but Virgin used to use T-Mobile/EE and it would barely give any speed for the vast majority of the journey, they used to have maps showing on the line map where they expected good service and slow service and no service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,294
|
Quote:
Virgin used to have on board amplifiers for certain networks. Orange may have been one of them?
Quote:
I was on a Virgin Train last week. WiFi was useless for much of the journey, handset signal was patchy at best, even when still in London. They still have stickers everywhere saying "WiFi from T-Mobile". Has no one told them that brand is dead and buried?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midlands
Posts: 502
|
Quote:
It's been like that for years, despite MBNL having the best 3g coverage it simply doesn't work well travelling at 125mph, I think 4G is meant to be slightly more resilient at high speeds so I'd hope that before long with higher 4g power levels there'll be some improvement. Whenever I'm down in London I effectively lose 4 hours of working that could be put to much better use if there were the proper infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North West
Posts: 4,883
|
Quote:
Virgin used to have on board amplifiers for certain networks. Orange may have been one of them?
Quote:
It's been like that for years, despite MBNL having the best 3g coverage it simply doesn't work well travelling at 125mph, I think 4G is meant to be slightly more resilient at high speeds so I'd hope that before long with higher 4g power levels there'll be some improvement. Whenever I'm down in London I effectively lose 4 hours of working that could be put to much better use if there were the proper infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,294
|
Quote:
Its interesting you should mention this, back in early March me and the hubby headed to London for a few days. I still had one of the first EE 100GB Dan & Phil sims knocking around. On the journey there and back I didn't lose signal once, even better I would say I was only on 3G 1/5 of the time, it was 4G all the way through. Admittedly I was using a Lumia 1020 and tethered to it. I really was surprised at the service level and quality, admiring how much ground EE has made. Never in a million years did I expect to get a strong signal on a train outside London. It might have been the equipment on the Pendolino trains has been upgraded. If it wasn't for the fact I am with Vodafone due to a discount I would have no problems moving to them, even if the pay monthly allowances a shite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 8,078
|
Quote:
It doesn't. Or, it didn't when I tried it the other week anyway!
Furthermore EE's signal couldn't seem to keep up with the speed of the train despite it apparently being "mobile enhanced" (not sure what that is) - 5 bars of actual signal but no throughput (on either phone or osprey hotspot) unless the train was stationary. I spent a disappointingly boring 3.5 hours! ![]() The reason there is often no connection at speed is to do with a combination of doppler effects, and rapid signal fade, this thread gives some background, and a link to a report from Korea http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1837375 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,875
|
4G can work quite well at very high speeds, it all depends on how close the mast is to the track.
I wonder how 800MHz 3 4G works on trains. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 8,078
|
Quote:
4G can work quite well at very high speeds, it all depends on how close the mast is to the track.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,541
|
Quote:
Or how far ? Having the mast right next to the track isn't going to be very helpful, particularly if the track is straight ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 8,078
|
Quote:
Because the ones which are designed to cover the railway have 2 sectors pointing in the two directions. It is also a bit easier to get masts near railways as the landowners are a bit more accommodating and I wouldn't have thought the planning system was too much of a problem either.
Having a mast next to the track, and firing down it, is only really going to benefit the driver (until the front of the train has passed !) Makes perfect sence for the train company UHF comms systems to use that method of course, and you often see a mast with two yagis firing up and down the track |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,541
|
Quote:
No, but if you're sat on a train, on a straight track, there's an awful lot of 'train' the signal has to pass through to get to you. If the mast is a mile or so away from the track, you are going to be line of sight for much longer periods.
Having a mast next to the track, and firing down it, is only really going to benefit the driver (until the front of the train has passed !) Makes perfect sence for the train company UHF comms systems to use that method of course, and you often see a mast with two yagis firing up and down the track |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 8,078
|
Quote:
We're talking about the WIFI services which these operators run, the mobile antennas are not inside the carriages. A lot of train site masts do only have 2 sectors pointing in the direction of the track, take a look next time you're around a railway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
A lot of train site masts do only have 2 sectors pointing in the direction of the track, take a look next time you're around a railway.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...bergavenny.jpg The old GSM-R sites used to use two yagi antennas, but these are slowly being dismantled. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:54.



