|
||||||||
Sky Sports Cricket Coverage 2016 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1076 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 319
|
It was mentioned in a Facebook Live video yesterday that both Nasser Hussain & Michael Atherton would be in Bangladesh for Sky. Ian Ward also mentioned he'd be presenting from the studio.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1077 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 93
|
i would imagine that sky will send out bumble nasir hussain michael atherton and botham
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1078 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,716
|
No sign of a September county game as yet.
Is there one in the bank? Would imagine Middlesex V Yorkshire on the 20th is being earmarked |
|
|
|
|
#1079 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 2,007
|
They will not announce a match until they know which, and more significantly when, they will be showing it. And that depends on the title chase.
If Yorkshire and Middlesex keep up with each other making the Lord's game a title decider it is certain to be shown. But if one of Yorkshire and Middlesex win their next two and other loses theirs, the champion will be decided in the penultimate round. So Sky will want to show whoever can win it then. And Somerset are not out of contention should they win their next two and the other two only draw or lose theirs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1080 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1081 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,716
|
Bumble also said that Sky doesn't have a contract to show 2 games a season
|
|
|
|
|
#1082 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,036
|
Bet it would have been on if it was Surrey v Lancashire, as that is who the majority of commentators played for (plus non player Colville a huge Surrey fan)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1083 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 10,702
|
Quote:
Bet it would have been on if it was Surrey v Lancashire, as that is who the majority of commentators played for (plus non player Colville a huge Surrey fan)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1084 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,036
|
Quote:
You don't seriously think the commentators make these kind of decisions do you?
To some extent, Yes. One of the excuses is 'No commentators available' Sky are clearly not interested in county cricket. They are the driving force for the 8 city franchise T20, and their commentators don't even bother to disguise their contempt for T20 fixtures like Derbyshire v Leicestershire. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1085 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,716
|
I don't think the commentators have any say at all..
However I do understand your point. Sky aren't hiding the fact that they have no time for county cricket. Its been treated awfully this summer... Although I suppose the other side of the coin is, without Sky would anyone else be interested? Its a tough one for the EBC. Personally I'm disgusted that there won't be a championship match shown, but the question is. Do enough people care? |
|
|
|
|
#1086 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gtr Manchester UK
Posts: 7,934
|
Top or bottom it's gonna be an exciting end, and if it's not shown it's a disgrace. However it does allow counties to webstream games + BBC commentary, Notts and Glamorgan have done it this season, so there's no reason the counties involved with the shake-up can't.
But in future, ECB needs to sell the one-day/Test rights to Sky, but have it's own youtube channel for the CC and let us sub to that if they can't do it for "free"/ad based. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1087 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,799
|
I find the BBC Commentary very good, you can bounce across all the games, on there website and app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1088 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,541
|
Quote:
No championship game on Sky
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1089 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,716
|
Quote:
I find the BBC Commentary very good, you can bounce across all the games, on there website and app.
Forgive me, as I have no clue on this subject but how costly is it to have 4 fixed cameras running at every ground? (They have £70 million in the bank) |
|
|
|
|
#1090 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 319
|
Quote:
i would imagine that sky will send out bumble nasir hussain michael atherton and botham
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1091 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gtr Manchester UK
Posts: 7,934
|
Quote:
I do too, the future is to stream county cricket with those commentary's. The ECB just need to realise that.
Forgive me, as I have no clue on this subject but how costly is it to have 4 fixed cameras running at every ground? (They have £70 million in the bank) I could stream the live pictures on youtube and get cash from the ads, or have it as a pay-channel, or simply allow viewers to watch free. The cam gives me pretty good pictures, but one costing a bit more would do so much better. If Lancs wanted a contribution, or even a sub, I'd be delighted to help. But in return I'd want all the games streamed - not just the days when Sky aren't showing something. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1092 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hull - UK City of Culture
Posts: 27,236
|
Am I getting confused here ?
Sky aren't showing any more county games. Fair enough. It would be nice if they were but sadly they have decided not to. I agree that the county game needs help so it would have been a double bonus. But how is showing games for free online helping the county game ? If a county were to stream games online then surely they should charge for it, they are in the business of making money after all. |
|
|
|
|
#1093 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,716
|
Quote:
Am I getting confused here ?
Sky aren't showing any more county games. Fair enough. It would be nice if they were but sadly they have decided not to. I agree that the county game needs help so it would have been a double bonus. But how is showing games for free online helping the county game ? If a county were to stream games online then surely they should charge for it, they are in the business of making money after all. I'm going to try not to antagonise you. As I know I normally do. You seem to be defending sky here so can I ask you a question. Let's just say I solely subscribed to sky for cricket. Since they had the contract, they've covered county cricket brilliantly. Championship, Pro 40, T20 et al. We've had championship cricket every September, this year promises one of the closest ever finishes. Recently my bill went up. Today I learn the championship finale won't be televised. I'm allowed to be grumpy surely? As for streaming them free online. I doubt anyone will stay away from the ground to watch it. And if 1 person watches for 10 minutes and gets into cricket , then surely that's good? |
|
|
|
|
#1094 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 234
|
Quote:
Am I getting confused here ?
Sky aren't showing any more county games. Fair enough. It would be nice if they were but sadly they have decided not to. I agree that the county game needs help so it would have been a double bonus. But how is showing games for free online helping the county game ? If a county were to stream games online then surely they should charge for it, they are in the business of making money after all. If they can entice more people to watch County Cricket even if it's via a stream then that increases exposure. Potentially that increases the possibility of making more money in the longer term (whether or not through charging for streams). |
|
|
|
|
|
#1095 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 234
|
Quote:
Today I learn the championship finale won't be televised.
I'm allowed to be grumpy surely? I guess the question is whether or not there is actually a customer who'll pay for the rights to transmit live County Championship cricket or not, and perhaps the ECB think not, which is why it's bundled with International cricket and not actually required to be shown if there's a conflict of interest... |
|
|
|
|
|
#1096 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hull - UK City of Culture
Posts: 27,236
|
Quote:
Hello Darren.
I'm going to try not to antagonise you. As I know I normally do. You seem to be defending sky here so can I ask you a question. Let's just say I solely subscribed to sky for cricket. Since they had the contract, they've covered county cricket brilliantly. Championship, Pro 40, T20 et al. We've had championship cricket every September, this year promises one of the closest ever finishes. Recently my bill went up. Today I learn the championship finale won't be televised. I'm allowed to be grumpy surely? As for streaming them free online. I doubt anyone will stay away from the ground to watch it. And if 1 person watches for 10 minutes and gets into cricket , then surely that's good? |
|
|
|
|
#1097 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hull - UK City of Culture
Posts: 27,236
|
Quote:
That depends on whether your aim is exposure or money.
If they can entice more people to watch County Cricket even if it's via a stream then that increases exposure. Potentially that increases the possibility of making more money in the longer term (whether or not through charging for streams). All I am saying is, if it is to be streamed they should charge for it so the counties can make some brass from it. |
|
|
|
|
#1098 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,776
|
Quote:
To me, this is more of an issue with how the rights are packaged than with Sky. If the ECB had actually wanted the County Championship to be shown (more regularly) then they could or should have included that requirement in the contract with Sky and/or offered packages containing just County Cricket that would be required to be shown.
I guess the question is whether or not there is actually a customer who'll pay for the rights to transmit live County Championship cricket or not, and perhaps the ECB think not, which is why it's bundled with International cricket and not actually required to be shown if there's a conflict of interest... have to check if they do actually meet the requirement this year. Quote:
plus 60 days of domestic cricket every season.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/england/...ry/551654.htmlwas widely reported in the press and even in Sky press releases of 60 days of domestic cricket have to count all the days up to see if it meets the requirements. Guessing with the blast having a huge block as met they covered a lot of T20 games and then the One days games meant they didn't actually have to show 2 County championship games to meet the criteria. Whereas when the T20 was in a block they couldn't show that many T20 games that they do now so had some days they could spend on the County championship. |
|
|
|
|
#1099 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,716
|
Quote:
Can I ask you a question Neil ? How do you deduce that I am defending Sky ?
|
|
|
|
|
#1100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hull - UK City of Culture
Posts: 27,236
|
Quote:
Maybe not defending, more sympathetic to their cause. Basically on their side.
I said Sky aren't showing any more county games. Fair enough. It would be nice if they were but sadly they have decided not to. I agree that the county game needs help so it would have been a double bonus. How is that either defending Sky or being sympathetic to them OR 'on their side' ??
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:17.




