• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Broadcasting
Sky Sports Cricket Coverage 2016
<<
<
58 of 69
>>
>
Judio
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Paul1511:
“What a selfish comment?

Not that I am surprised, I remember when the opposite happened years ago and cricket over an into the start of NFL. The NFL fans were spewing.

Get over it. Live sport is unpredictable, it happens.”

The ENGLISH cricket
The AMERICAN Football

Its not selfish ???
Neil_Harris
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Paul1511:
“What a selfish comment?

Not that I am surprised, I remember when the opposite happened years ago and cricket over an into the start of NFL. The NFL fans were spewing.

Get over it. Live sport is unpredictable, it happens.”

All I would say on this is, why risk the 2 live sports they had overlapping. They have 5 channels.

Oh and what was NFL doing on 2 anyhow. It's the cricket channel
Darren Lethem
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Neil_Harris:
“All I would say on this is, why risk the 2 live sports they had overlapping. They have 5 channels.

Oh and what was NFL doing on 2 anyhow. It's the cricket channel ”

They have 5 channels and the cricket was on 2 of them in the schedule but nobody thought to record SS4 just in case did they ?
Judio
24-10-2016
The Series Link did not pick up SS4
Neil_Harris
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Darren Lethem:
“They have 5 channels and the cricket was on 2 of them in the schedule but nobody thought to record SS4 just in case did they ?”

Of course Darren, it's my silly fault that I didn't think to look for the cricket on sky sports 4, in addition to my series link on sky sports 2.
Paul1511
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Judio:
“The ENGLISH cricket
The AMERICAN Football

Its not selfish ???”

Wow. Selfish and Xenophobic.

You really are a treat.
jazzydrury3
24-10-2016
If at the end of play yesterday, on there graphic they said Cricket Monday 24 October 4.45am, Sky Sports 2, And underneath they said Sky Sports 4, then people would have recorded both.

Why would anybody had randomly recorded Sky Sports 4
Darren Lethem
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Neil_Harris:
“Of course Darren, it's my silly fault that I didn't think to look for the cricket on sky sports 4, in addition to my series link on sky sports 2.”

I never said it was your fault, stop acting like a kid. You questioned why, when they have 5 channels, it over ran. I simply answered that they did think of that by putting it on two channels. Of course that doesnt help series link but they did come up with a solution and an answer to your question. The chances of the NFL game needing overtime and the test going into a 5th day were slim but it did happen.

I feel for those who had series link set up but live sport can often over run, ask Eastenders fans during Wimbledon fortnight
jazzydrury3
24-10-2016
I guess if it hadn't been such a vital ending to the Test Match there wouldnt be anybody moaning.

Sky Actually have 6 Sports Channels, if you include MIx
Darren Lethem
24-10-2016
You have two options

Moan about it and let it ruin your day

or

Move on and forget it, far worse things happen in life
alfamale
24-10-2016
I did not see any sky sports4 mention of cricket. England cricket is always on skysport2, especially the very last session of what could have been the closest test of all time (and how they still milk the 2005 close finish). So when i'm finding sky sports rather expensive because of my current financial circumstances but love my cricket i expect Sky to deliver something far better. I was fuming when i got up 7.30am and found myself fast forwarding through nfl to eventually find the last 3 balls of the Test match had recorded.

Anyone who recorded NFL would have expected it to become cricket at 4.45am. Anyone watching NFL at 4.45am could have been asked to change channel. And anyone at sky sports who even scheduled such a clash should be sacked. For the first time ever i am going to write a complaint (i think i must be getting old, oh well). Anyone know the sky(sports) email address most likely to get me a response?
inothernews
24-10-2016
Reminds me of the time my dear old mum recorded 3 hours of ceefax and music for me instead of the cricket.

I can quite understand how fed up you would be if you had set 'record' only to be let down by a channel change.
1066simon
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Judio:
“The ENGLISH cricket
The AMERICAN Football

Its not selfish ???”

100% agree with you Judio.
1066simon
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Paul1511:
“Wow. Selfish and Xenophobic.

You really are a treat.”

Xenophobic? Why don't you use words you can understand.
1066simon
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Neil_Harris:
“Of course Darren, it's my silly fault that I didn't think to look for the cricket on sky sports 4, in addition to my series link on sky sports 2.”

Spot on, Neil.
1066simon
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Darren Lethem:
“I never said it was your fault, stop acting like a kid. You questioned why, when they have 5 channels, it over ran. I simply answered that they did think of that by putting it on two channels. Of course that doesnt help series link but they did come up with a solution and an answer to your question. The chances of the NFL game needing overtime and the test going into a 5th day were slim but it did happen.

I feel for those who had series link set up but live sport can often over run, ask Eastenders fans during Wimbledon fortnight”

'Stop acting like a kid'. Pot and kettle spring to mind.
Judio
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Paul1511:
“Wow. Selfish and Xenophobic.

You really are a treat.”

It is not Xenophobic to expect to see your own cricket team in your own country on TV
jazzydrury3
24-10-2016
The Verdict hasn't been moved has it.

According to SSNHQ this morning and the EPG there was a live Verdict at 3pm, what is on there now is What looks like the beginning of the highlights
Cricketblade
24-10-2016
I'm looking forward to seeing how ITV drag out the play today for a hour with no on screen presenters!
jazzydrury3
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Cricketblade:
“I'm looking forward to seeing how ITV drag out the play today for a hour with no on screen presenters!”

Maybe they could do a 30 minute programme, and put a old Mr Bean, On the Buses type thing on
Neil_Harris
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by jazzydrury3:
“Maybe they could do a 30 minute programme, and put a old Mr Bean, On the Buses type thing on”

Perhaps they could show classic IPL (It's the kind of thing sky would do)
Neil_Harris
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Darren Lethem:
“I never said it was your fault, stop acting like a kid. You questioned why, when they have 5 channels, it over ran. I simply answered that they did think of that by putting it on two channels.”

Thanks Darren for another pleasant exchange.
jazzydrury3
24-10-2016
The Verdict was just half an hour, I guess not much they could really discuss.

I guess all in all the nature of how the day panned out didn't help Sky.

If England had got 2 wickets in the first 2 balls today, the NFL fans would be moaning about it being put behind the red button or Moved to SS4, when the cricket could have been over in 2 balls.

Obviously regarding the Verdict, there wasn't enough highlghts to fill an hour, and not much to discuss on a hour long Verdict.

Maybe in the sub continent they need to start half an hour early, cause it always tends to get dark 5 minutes after play is ended/
Darren Lethem
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Neil_Harris:
“Perhaps they could show classic IPL (It's the kind of thing sky would do)”

Your life is cricket. Your twitter shows that. Nothing else matters in your life and therefore you cannot handle it when anybody dare come up with, a perfectly reasonable, reason why cricket may not be the most important thing in the world.

I shall now do what I should have done long ago and block you. You are a prime example of a first world problems man.
Darren Lethem
24-10-2016
Originally Posted by Cricketblade:
“I'm looking forward to seeing how ITV drag out the play today for a hour with no on screen presenters!”

Originally Posted by jazzydrury3:
“Maybe they could do a 30 minute programme, and put a old Mr Bean, On the Buses type thing on”

Highlights on for 45 minutes followed by Football Rivalries
<<
<
58 of 69
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map