|
||||||||
If Scott hadn't walked what would have happened with your fired |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,270
|
If Scott hadn't walked what would have happened with your fired
Seems suspicious that the week someone refused to go on it someone mysterious quits from the winning team
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Up the creak without a paddle
Posts: 5,542
|
Quote:
Seems suspicious that the week someone refused to go on it someone mysterious quits from the winning team
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,501
|
It could be that ironically they feared Scott may not do YF due to walking, especially as he seemed angry about things. So it probably just happened that the fired one did that instead then Scott was actually happy to do YF, and did it with good grace as well.
I suppose it's also possible they might have let the losing team off and talked it over before deciding to go ahead with a firing. As for your specific question maybe they would have just done the show with no fired candidate or perhaps got one or two already fired people to talk over things. I am sure they could still work something out even if they didn't have the most recently fired (or quitting) candidate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,746
|
Quote:
I suspect there would have been a double firing.
I expect it YF would still go on if Selina had been the only one fired, they could've still discussed the show and maybe brought in some earlier fired candidates to talk about the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 19
|
Yeh, they wouldn't of done a double firing next week and they need 5 for the interviews.
Haven't they done You're Fired's without guests before though? I think there was one 2 years ago where someones father passed away a few days before. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,314
|
Quote:
Seems suspicious that the week someone refused to go on it someone mysterious quits from the winning team
As for what would have happened, they would have just done the show without Selina and moved on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 210
|
A 20 minute comedy sketch from Romesh
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,501
|
Quote:
I suspect there would have been a double firing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
|
Honestly I don't think The Apprentice team knew Selina would be refusing to appear on YF at the time. It's not like they went "Oh well Selina isn't doing YF, quick, either make Scott quit or fire Gary!"
I think had Scott not quit we would have had a very stripped back YF. No panel members, just Jack and Romesh, relentlessly taking the piss out of Selina for not having the balls to appear on YF. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,501
|
Quote:
Yeh, they wouldn't of done a double firing next week and they need 5 for the interviews.
Haven't they done You're Fired's without guests before though? I think there was one 2 years ago where someones father passed away a few days before. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,092
|
Quote:
Yeh, they wouldn't of done a double firing next week and they need 5 for the interviews.
Haven't they done You're Fired's without guests before though? I think there was one 2 years ago where someones father passed away a few days before. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,746
|
Quote:
Sound familiar. It was a female contestant IIRC, but I think she was one of 2/3 people to be fired that week so they still had other contestants to fill her time with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 14,104
|
Quote:
Yeh, they wouldn't of done a double firing next week and they need 5 for the interviews.
Haven't they done You're Fired's without guests before though? I think there was one 2 years ago where someones father passed away a few days before. I'd say they would still have kept Gary anyway and just did a double next week - Gary wasn't really shown to have made errors which cost the team (it was basically Selina and Joseph - Gary/Charleine got a similar amount to Brett and Scott (think about maybe £5k difference at most) whilst Selina/Joseph were at least £50k down on Richard/Vana which was what really cost them, surprised that LAS didn't take Joseph to task more on that) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 19,193
|
They would have done a show about the show, showed unseen footage and taken the piss out of mistakes. Not having a fired guest to interview isn't the end of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,092
|
Quote:
Yep that was the triple firing from last year with Ella, Sarah and Steven
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,915
|
Quote:
Yep that was the triple firing from last year with Ella, Sarah and Steven
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,021
|
What did annoy me is they didn't take the time to ask the audience if Selina should have been fired.
In fact, they largely ignored her departure, maybe for fear of more 'revelations' from her. If I was part of the production company I think I would seriously be considering taking SWS to court. Gary was lucky. Without Scott falling on his sword I think he would have gone. I'm sure most years it is 4 (not 5) that make the interview process, so I assume 2 get fired next week (probably Charleine and Gary) |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,829
|
I suspect she didn't want to do the show as she didn't want to share the limelight with Scott.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
I think this is just a happy co-incidence. If Selina had gone on YF, Scott wouldn't have, as he was seen as a 'quitter', after Selina refused, they had to have a candidate on so contacted Scott.
They couldn't have known about Selina's refusal to be on YF before Scott quit, that's tantamount to saying she was told she'd be being fired before she was. The only other theory - and this is a long shot - after Selina refused to go on YF, they ordered her back to re-film the boardroom bit again, got all the other candidates back, and Scott, who was going to be fired the following week in a double firing, was asked to 'quit' the show in order to fill the YF quota, afterwards, the next weeks firing would be refilmed too with only one firing.... Long shot, as I said. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
...and Scott would be edited out of an entire task?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
Quote:
...and Scott would be edited out of an entire task?
Just fallen flat haven't we. LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,601
|
Quote:
I think this is just a happy co-incidence. If Selina had gone on YF, Scott wouldn't have, as he was seen as a 'quitter', after Selina refused, they had to have a candidate on so contacted Scott.
They couldn't have known about Selina's refusal to be on YF before Scott quit, that's tantamount to saying she was told she'd be being fired before she was. The only other theory - and this is a long shot - after Selina refused to go on YF, they ordered her back to re-film the boardroom bit again, got all the other candidates back, and Scott, who was going to be fired the following week in a double firing, was asked to 'quit' the show in order to fill the YF quota, afterwards, the next weeks firing would be refilmed too with only one firing.... Long shot, as I said. ![]() I think she's kicked off long after she was eliminated. Probably around about now isn, she's realised she probably think she can make a name for herself like Katie Hopkins, or be the next Steve Brookstein I think if Scott hadn't quit at the same time as luck would have it they might have shown two episodes, skipped the show altogether this week etc I love how they didn't mention her, attention is what she want's don't give it her. I'm not saying there are truth's in some of the things she has said but she's using it to try and establish herself after all some have made that sorta thing work. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15.


