Has The Ample Lady Already Sung ? - Is This Years Strictly A Jay Forgone Conclusion?

If last weeks robot tango dance could not stop the Jay Juggernaut its really beginning to look like nothing will.


Do you like Foregone Conclusions being the way to end series on Strictly Come Dancing ?

What was the last Forgone Conclusion that you can remember ?

Oh my goodness, jeans and a lumberjack shirt on Strictly, how disrespectful.

... so you assume that the contestants actually "choose" the costumes?

Personally I didn't like the jeans thing but as it fits with the concept I can see why they gave him that look

39 , highest male rumba ,

Never mind Jay ,

As Mercury Rev would say , I saw a goddess on a highway , , Aliona was on fire ,

I don't think many would agree to wear jeans and a lumberjack shirt on such a glitzy show as Strictly Come Dancing even if it was forced on them.

LOL, if you've actually watched SCD over the years you will realise how amusing that is given some of the dire concoctions we've seen over the years. Jeans and a shirt pales into insignificance in comparison

Who is the ample lady ?

Absolute travesty tonight, he should never have got those scores.

He has won it since that Jive

As far as I'm concerned I will see what the DO results are for tonight and next week but if it goes the way I think it does I will not be watching the final.

I don't enjoy it when it is a forgone conclusion at all.

Interesting that Len said, "You won't be dancing again tonight".

Jodie Prenger - her of the 'Singing' Terms and Conditions...

Cheers buddy ,

That woman , not keen on her


Ps where you been hiding

Yep , what a waste of time for the ladies taking part , they must be devastated watching jay getting shoe horned into the final at any cost .
I'm not keen on gleb at all but I felt for him and anita tonight . He was literally speechless . Her wee face going up the stairs . The comments were far too brutal and her routine was amazing , not one dull moment .
The marking and comments spoiled the show tonight . Trashed it .

Have to agree on something , Poor Anita , a lesser person would of been in tears
She is a trouper , hope the public keep her in , two fingers up to the judges ,

Cheers buddy ,

That woman , not keen on her [/quote]

You're welcome.

Well prepare yourself - she is on top of many a list of "Who do you think should take part next year" lists...



Have had a real hectic couple of weeks so have been forced to "lie low" for a while...glad to see I and my polls have been missed!!!

Hey Edy , told you Jay would be sound as a pound in the rumba ,

You're welcome.

Well prepare yourself - she is on top of many a list of "Who do you think should take part next year" lists...




Have had a real hectic couple of weeks so have been forced to "lie low" for a while...glad to see I and my polls have been missed!!![/quote]

Well she could do with the exercise , so why not ,

Yawn yawn

You tired luv

[quote=SKID1;80632502]You tired luv [/Q

Only by your post

Love it! Never thought I'd see Mercury Rev mentioned in a Strictly thread! And yes, Aliona was on fire!

[quote=Twinkle toes no;80632542]

Oh , thought it could of be Jaliona,s dreamy Rumba , sending you into a daydream

[quote=SKID1;80632606]
Nah lumberjack shirts don't do it for me. Or the non expressive faces ewwww.

I'm kind of afraid that it is, and it's rather spoiling this year's show for me to be honest!

He has WAY more experience than any of the others, far too much really to take part. It's just not fair to judge him in the same competition as non-dancers such as Anita.

Plus, though he might do the steps well, I just don't feel anything when he dances - personality, emotion, they're both lacking. He's improved a bit in that regard, I'll give him that, but he's still far too flat.

But, he is a sweet, cheeky chap, and he'd probably win the competition even if he came out and just stood there for the duration of the dance. *sigh*

Who originally said

It's not over until the fat lady sings (or something similar)

Makes me think of the Morcambe & Wise shows but the quote may have been earlier.