|
||||||||
New TV |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,446
|
New TV
I am currently looking for a new 32 inch tv for my bedroom to replace my old Phillips which has now bit the dust, i have my eye on http://www.johnlewis.com/sony-bravia...wi-fi/p1919520 and http://www.johnlewis.com/lg-32lf650v...asses/p1973301
does anyone on here have either of these TV's, i am leaning towards the LG as i like the 3D feature and it is also currently in stock, but then i have always heard that sony is the best brand out there and it is also cheaper in price but without the 3D. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,008
|
Go for the LG. Sony are over rated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
Quote:
Go for the LG. Sony are over rated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
|
Make no decision without seeing the picture on both sets with comparable input signals. If 3D is something you are likely to seldom use, and the Sony pq is better, then I would say go for the Sony. If 3D is important for films or gaming and you feel you'll regret not having it, plump for the LG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
Go for the LG. Sony are over rated.
In all fairness I think the value for money on Sony, Samsung, LG & Panasonic is actually very similar. LG & Samsung tend to be a bit less, but they seem to be less reliable and they don't seem to perform as well in my opinion either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Heart of England.
Posts: 8,633
|
I'm looking at new TVs at the moment and there are (relatively cheap) Sony and Panasonic UHDTVs getting better reviews than more expensive Samsungs.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,008
|
Quote:
Completely untrue, as always Sony and Panasonic are the best two brands, and LG/Samsung the middling two.
But. Sony are over rated and seem to have a non intuitive operating system. Panasonic are hobbled to only work in one country of the EU rather than the whole of it. They also seem to have problems coping with FEC changes on transponders necessitating a complete re install when this happens. Samsung had problems with dud capacitors, maybe fixed now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Heart of England.
Posts: 8,633
|
Quote:
That is your opinion which you regularly state.
But. Sony are over rated and seem to have a non intuitive operating system. Panasonic are hobbled to only work in one country of the EU rather than the whole of it. They also seem to have problems coping with FEC changes on transponders necessitating a complete re install when this happens. Samsung had problems with dud capacitors, maybe fixed now. LGs seem to have issues with input lag, so as a gamer I wouldn't touch them with a barge pole. Samsungs seem to have issues with smooth movement unless you're looking and their very high end models, so again I wouldn't be interested. Even the more modest Sony and Panasonc models (barring the cheap Vestel rebadges) are good all rounders in terms of picture quality and performance. Something that I hold in much higher regard than the (non)issues you have raised. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
That is your opinion which you regularly state.
But. Sony are over rated and seem to have a non intuitive operating system. Panasonic are hobbled to only work in one country of the EU rather than the whole of it. They also seem to have problems coping with FEC changes on transponders necessitating a complete re install when this happens. Samsung had problems with dud capacitors, maybe fixed now. It is also your opinion that Sony are over rated just as much as it it other that they are not. As for Samsung reliability, we still repair a hell of a lot of them, vastly more than we do Panasonic/Sony. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,469
|
If you are buying a "smart" TV you may need a power line adaptor, Winston will advise you as to the best one to buy.............
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
Quote:
As for Samsung reliability, we still repair a hell of a lot of them, vastly more than we do Panasonic/Sony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Caledonia
Posts: 5,687
|
Quote:
That is your opinion which you regularly state.
But. Sony are over rated and seem to have a non intuitive operating system. Panasonic are hobbled to only work in one country of the EU rather than the whole of it. They also seem to have problems coping with FEC changes on transponders necessitating a complete re install when this happens. Samsung had problems with dud capacitors, maybe fixed now. I'm looking forward to Sony and Panasonic's OLED offerings (I know they'll have LG panels but there's more to a TV than the panel I think) |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
That's pretty general across the service trade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
As for Samsung reliability, we still repair a hell of a lot of them, vastly more than we do Panasonic/Sony.
Pretty much any sales figures in the public domain now have Samsung as the number 1 seller - I suspect in reality Vestel actual shift the most units overall when you consider how many different sets go out under different badges from them though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
Quote:
Pretty much any sales figures in the public domain now have Samsung as the number 1 seller - I suspect in reality Vestel actual shift the most units overall when you consider how many different sets go out under different badges from them though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,008
|
Quote:
If you are buying a "smart" TV you may need a power line adaptor, Winston will advise you as to the best one to buy.............
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 416
|
I've had a couple of Samsungs, a couple of Panasonics and am now on my 1st Sony.
For PQ alone, the Sony wins hands down. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Huddersfield
Posts: 1,876
|
Quote:
That is your opinion which you regularly state.
But. Sony are over rated and seem to have a non intuitive operating system. Panasonic are hobbled to only work in one country of the EU rather than the whole of it. They also seem to have problems coping with FEC changes on transponders necessitating a complete re install when this happens. Samsung had problems with dud capacitors, maybe fixed now. Care to tell me why (apart from maybe the Irish border) this is so important? Never once have I taken my TV on a foreign (or domestic) holiday with me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
Quote:
Why do I keep reading this on here?
Care to tell me why (apart from maybe the Irish border) this is so important?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
But I'll bet your selling twice as many Samsung as Panasonic and Sony combined.
Pretty much any sales figures in the public domain now have Samsung as the number 1 seller - I suspect in reality Vestel actual shift the most units overall when you consider how many different sets go out under different badges from them though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Heart of England.
Posts: 8,633
|
Quote:
No, we sell 95% Panasonic TVs. The odd Linsar, Samsung, Sony, Hisense goes out too but we're know as a Panasonic seller& do the repairs for Panasonic too giving us the ability to look after people before & after they buy from us.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,981
|
Sony KDL-32W705C.
Rated 51% by Which? Pros: Decent HD picture quality, smart-TV apps, PVR feature, affordable price. Cons: Abysmal sound quality, SD picture could be better, smart TV not great to use, narrow viewing angle. By contrast: Samsung UE32H6200 Rated 76% by Which? Pros: Great picture quality, superb sound, excellent features. Cons: Smart TV not great to use with standard remote. Samsung UE32H6400 Rated 79% by Which? Pros: Great picture quality, decent sound, impressive smart TV and other features. Cons: Smart touch control could be easier to use. http://www.which.co.uk/reviews/telev...ow-we-test-tvs |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,206
|
Quote:
You're perhaps the man in the know - have you any experience of Panasonic's own refurbs? You can get a good deal on their 2015 models via their outlet store if you're willing to take a punt. Are they worth it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
If you are buying a "smart" TV you may need a power line adaptor, Winston will advise you as to the best one to buy.............
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
You're perhaps the man in the know - have you any experience of Panasonic's own refurbs? You can get a good deal on their 2015 models via their outlet store if you're willing to take a punt. Are they worth it?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:04.



