• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Why The Negativity Over Abbey Clancey
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
TerryM22
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by lundavra:
“Could happen with Katie! Can't stand Anton but he does seem to appeal to some groups who are voting heavily for them.”

I love Anton, he is amazing.
Scorpio2
11-12-2015
She was overrated and ties with Chris Hollins as worst winner.
Mr Cellophane
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by Miriam_R:
“Did you feel for Abbey when he cheated on her (before strictly). That was apparently what a lovely man he was.

If she won because of Alijaz, why hasn't Alijaz's power lasted with Helen and get her to the final (if it's just him and not the partner that is the voting factor for viewers). I doubt a celeb could win based on just the popularity of a pro, there has to be some mix, otherwise lots of loved pros would have won the show already regardless of their celeb being liked or not.

If you dislike abbey fair enough, it's fair and reasonable not to connect with someone or dislike them, but she was one of the good dancers on the show (she wasn't bad technically by any stretch) and I doubt Alijaz alone was why she (and he won) won. Alijaz was lucky to to have such a good dancer to work with first time out, as he didn't come close to winning with Alison. all the pros benefit from having someone that can actually dance.

I wanted Natalie to win, I love dancers first and foremost, but I can give credit where credit is due and abbey was a beautiful dancer imo and I can happily admit that despite wanting the best dancer to win on the day.”


A very sensible post Miriam - in complete contrast to the spiteful post you were replying to!
Fred.
11-12-2015
I couldn't say Abbey was my favourite winner though I did like her dancing with Aljaz. Her ballroom was beautiful and she developed so well.

Thought she was pleasant and had a nice relationship with Aljaz, but did find her mildly irritating - for example forever playing with her hair. Didn't know anything about her marriage.

However I much preferred Abbey to Natalie G - who started good and stayed good so no 'journey' - she also made too many dramas out of crises for me. (Prefer Jay's attitude- though him not letting the PTB refer to any problems in any way is a bit far.)

I really liked Kevin in his first Series - remember him in the Tesspit almost in shock saying 'I didn't think it would be as intense as this!'. Found Susanna nice and enthusiastic, but a bit OTT. (I like Anita a lot too - but she's in danger of going OTT!)
sanfran1
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by Miriam_R:
“Did you feel for Abbey when he cheated on her (before strictly). That was apparently what a lovely man he was.

If she won because of Alijaz, why hasn't Alijaz's power lasted with Helen and get her to the final (if it's just him and not the partner that is the voting factor for viewers). I doubt a celeb could win based on just the popularity of a pro, there has to be some mix, otherwise lots of loved pros would have won the show already regardless of their celeb being liked or not.

If you dislike abbey fair enough, it's fair and reasonable not to connect with someone or dislike them, but she was one of the good dancers on the show (she wasn't bad technically by any stretch) and I doubt Alijaz alone was why she (and he won) won. Alijaz was lucky to to have such a good dancer to work with first time out, as he didn't come close to winning with Alison. all the pros benefit from having someone that can actually dance.

I wanted Natalie to win, I love dancers first and foremost, but I can give credit where credit is due and abbey was a beautiful dancer imo and I can happily admit that despite wanting the best dancer to win on the day.”

BIB. Two wrongs don't make a right. I knew nothing about her (or her marriage) before Strictly. I can only react to what I saw of her on Strictly.
I still believe that the Alijaz factor was a big part of the reason for her winning - he was new IIRC and it is true that some voters will always support their favourite pro.
Anyway, surely we can agree that Strictly is not just about the dancing; personality does influence viewers and in Abbey's case I definitely wasn't a fan.
coppertop1
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by lundavra:
“I liked her as well. There is a tendency to be a culture of bullying on many online systems which often can go way too far. It usually focuses on women particularly if they are attractive, blonde and do not have a Southern accent. Many seem to think this means they must be thick and of course being a 'WAG' completes the set of things they can use to attack the person.”

That's a very sweeping statement.

I didn't particularly like her, nor dislike her, and non of my non feelings about her were because she was attractive, blonde, and does not have a southern accent.

I am not saying your wrong I just wondered where such a sweeping statement came from?
DeltaBlues
11-12-2015
At the time I had no strong feelings over Abbey, she was just "there". I supported Sophie most of the way through the series then surprised myself by voting for Natalie in the final, but it was the least partisan I've ever been. I remember being quite surprised when Abbey won as I hadn't appreciated how much support she had, but I wasn't gutted or anything.

Retrospectively, I've warmed to her much more and there are a couple of her dances (samba and Charleston) which I've fairly recently added to my YouTube Strictly playlist - not because I think they're the BEST DANCES EVAH or anything like that (I've got Chris Hollins' Charleston in there too ) but simply because I enjoy watching them and I can finally, belatedly, appreciate her love of dance that I didn't really pick up on or connect with at the time.
DiamondDoll
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by DeltaBlues:
“At the time I had no strong feelings over Abbey, she was just "there". I supported Sophie most of the way through the series then surprised myself by voting for Natalie in the final, but it was the least partisan I've ever been. I remember being quite surprised when Abbey won as I hadn't appreciated how much support she had, but I wasn't gutted or anything.

Retrospectively, I've warmed to her much more and there are a couple of her dances (samba and Charleston) which I've fairly recently added to my YouTube Strictly playlist - not because I think they're the BEST DANCES EVAH or anything like that (I've got Chris Hollins' Charleston in there too ) but simply because I enjoy watching them and I can finally, belatedly, appreciate her love of dance that I didn't really pick up on or connect with at the time.”

That is such a nice thing to say about AC.
VicsMum
11-12-2015
I don't think she won solely because of Aljaz but it would be disingenuous to say a new male pro isn't a pull for the typical demographic of this programme:

Artem won in his first year with Kara.

Pasha got to the final with Chelsee in his first year (and wuzrobbed).

Aljaz won with Abbey and Kevin got to the final with Susanna, both in their first year.

As for this year, Gleb and Giovanni have come this far with their ladies and while there's a question mark over Georgia's head, Anita is most likely to get to the final.
HopesandDreams
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by Miriam_R:
“Did you feel for Abbey when he cheated on her (before strictly). That was apparently what a lovely man he was.

If she won because of Alijaz, why hasn't Alijaz's power lasted with Helen and get her to the final (if it's just him and not the partner that is the voting factor for viewers). I doubt a celeb could win based on just the popularity of a pro, there has to be some mix, otherwise lots of loved pros would have won the show already regardless of their celeb being liked or not.

If you dislike abbey fair enough, it's fair and reasonable not to connect with someone or dislike them, but she was one of the good dancers on the show (she wasn't bad technically by any stretch) and I doubt Alijaz alone was why she (and he won) won. Alijaz was lucky to to have such a good dancer to work with first time out, as he didn't come close to winning with Alison. all the pros benefit from having someone that can actually dance.

I wanted Natalie to win, I love dancers first and foremost, but I can give credit where credit is due and abbey was a beautiful dancer imo and I can happily admit that despite wanting the best dancer to win on the day.”

Miriam what a gracious post, thank you.

I respect everyone's opinion of course, but I absolutely adored Abbey from day one. I accept for those really in the know regards technicality et al, she perhaps was not up with some of the other dancers, but her relationship with Alijaz was amazing, and she for me, had such elegance, a real natural beauty, and an absolute joy to watch.

In real life she is just as lovely not uppity at all, not a sniff of diva about her, polite and in real life just as beautiful off the screen as she was on it.

My absolute favourite strictly dancer and I am over the moon she is on the Christmas show, I cannot wait.
-Sid-
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by LoracShakti:
“I think my problem with her started in Blackpool when she had gapping so big in her Quickstep that a Blackpool tram could have driven through it. Yet 3 of the judges gave her a 10. .”

Yeah. Such an obvious fault so blatantly ignored. That was the start of the Abbey promotion which then went into over-drive. Put me right off.

Lovely Waltz. But that was it really.
Miriam_R
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by sanfran1:
“Two wrongs don't make a right. I knew nothing about her (or her marriage) before Strictly. I can only react to what I saw of her on Strictly.”

Sure, two wrongs don't make a right, in general terms. However the way Abbey behaved on the show though is more a matter of interpretation, isn't is, or I think so anyway. Some viewers may have seen it as you did (and you prob weren't the only one) while some others may have just thought she was no exception to previous over tactile and perhaps over flirty celebs (male and female) before her. It's debatable whether she actually did anything wrong, as I suppose we all have different boundaries depending on certain factors. However what he did I think leaves very little room for debate and is beyond what Abbey did. If you were't aware then fair enough. Even just based on Abbey alone though, she didn't cause any harm that I could see, and no worse than others, imo.

Originally Posted by sanfran1:
“True that some voters will always support their favourite pro.”

It's true they absolutely do, but plenty of the pros do badly the year after they do well (and vice versa) based on the celeb they had from one year to the next, so it is the mix rather than just the pro on their own. The celeb changes the pros fortunes each year, that's why year on year we debate whether our loved pros will get so called duffers or not because it's a big factor most of the time.

Originally Posted by sanfran1:
“BIB. surely we can agree that Strictly is not just about the dancing; personality does influence viewers and in Abbey's case I definitely wasn't a fan.”

Yes, I can absolutley agree it does.
All I meant was, regardless of whether you like someone's character, won't change whether they are actually technically good or not which is the area that is large focus of determining whether someone can actually dance. Adding the emotion and character are other aspects of bringing to life a dance, but if someone can grasp the technical elements which is the actual skill to dance then they can dance, regardles of whether they can add that connecting quality that makes it beyond technical dancing and regardless of whether you like, love or loathe them.

Some people in general equate not connecting to a dance emotionally as a person not being able to dance, but the skill of dancing is the actual technique which you build first and foremost before anything else. You can have a dancer that is cold and cannot emote, but is still a physical dancer. You can have a good actor that can emote feeling, but is not a dancer if they can't physical do the actual dance skill part. Sure, the dance may not feel alive as just steps and movements, but visually and physically you are still seeing dancing. Watching a dance to no sound or music may not be enjoyabel, but it's still dancing. The form will still be recognisable.

Emotionally people may not have connected to Abbey which is totally fair, but technically she was nowhere near bad (in my own eyes, as someone that danced nearly all my childhood and young adult life), so the disconnect with her may have had less to do with her dancing as she could techically dance. Apologies if I am wrong. Abbey wasn't the best on the show, or in the history of the show and yes, some hit and miss rouines here and there, but still more than decent overall for the series considering she's not a long-life professional/specialist latin or ballroom dancer.

But yes, I totally understand that we connect differently to people as personalities which can aid our appreciation of their dancing ability and emotional expression.
Miriam_R
11-12-2015
I don't think she won solely because of Aljaz but it would be disingenuous to say a new male pro isn't a pull for the typical demographic of this programme:

Without question could be a pull, but that pull aided by the celebrity. And also, if we're talking demographic, women are other women's biggest demographic, if we're to believe what is suggested by those people that visualise their target audiences. it is believed men can predominantly only watch and suport somethng predominantly with males in it, whereas females can watch and suport anything with males or females in it. The idea is if any woman on tv is to get support, she needs a female audience at minimum. Not my rules, what those gods of tv, film and media say about their ideas of viewership.

Originally Posted by VicsMum:
“
Artem won in his first year with Kara.
Yes, Kara who was a lovely girl and also a lovely dancer. Both prob aided by the talk of a romance which may have helped connect some viewers to them, on top of the dancing. Artem was painted as the cold, strict terminator, with Kara his contrasting smiley, chirpy lovely opposite. The difference may have intrigued some viewers and he was blessed to be able to create nice routines with someone that had the tools for him to do it with on his very first outing. Artem didn't get as far with with Ferne, so he lacks pull with lesser dancers, but does well with good dancers. So the trend is perhaps his dancer's ability as much as himself.

Pasha got to the final with Chelsee in his first year (and wuzrobbed).
Yes, Chelsee who was sometimes seen as a dippy but harmless very nice girl that, like Kara, had a talent to dance. They had a nice relationship, so easy to watch as a pair on and off the floor. Pasha is a nice man too, so together they were a nice combo and he, like Artem was, lucky to have a talented dancer on his first outing. He does well with good dancers, didn't get as far with Rachel and Carol (though granted prob further than expected with Carol).
I would agree, I think Chelsee should have won that year, though I wouldn't say robbed as such, as the public vote is the correct vote (regardless of whether I persoanlly agree with it).

Aljaz won with Abbey and Kevin got to the final with Susanna, both in their first year.
Alijaz, i see pretty much in the same way as Artem and Pasha. Did well with two good dancers, but made no real mark with a lesser dancer like Alison. When the pros has a limited pro, sometimes himself is not enough.

As for this year, Gleb and Giovanni have come this far with their ladies and while there's a question mark over Georgia's head, Anita is most likely to get to the final.”

Gleb and Giovanni, both again have very decent dancers, Anita extremely decent for a total novice! So again, they have the tools to a degree. Georgia imo is a better dancer than Anita, so it's a shame for Giovanni that he might just miss out on the final in his first year, but how lucky was he to get a dancer in Georgia. he's even said it himself.

With Gleb, Alijaz, Giovanni, Pasha and Artem, all, imo, did well in there opening years because they were not limited by their partners. They could show what they were made of, as well as showcase their partner too. If Alijaz had Alison first year, Artem had Ferne in the first year, Pasha had Rachel the first year and Giovanni say.... the least best dancing female this year, their fortunes may well have been diffferent for their debut series. I know, prob silly to speculate, but as we know that they didn't get as far with certain partners, it may well be a good guess they would have similarly not got as far with them if they had been paried with them on their very first outing. Then we'd be saying, lets hope we see them with a better dancer next year, like has been said of Oti this year, or Joanne last year. We're not sure of how we totally feel for Oti and Joanne becasue they've not had good partners. It will be interesting to see how Giovanni and Gleb will fair with lesser dancers, as Pasha, Artem and Aljaz certainly had contrasting years when they didn't have good dancers.

As for Kevin, well, I will hold my hands up. Yes Susanna was the talked about tv presenter at the time, but I am surprised they got far, but... they did, and well done to them. However not surprised at all that he got to the final with Frankie, as she was pretty much a contender from very early on and she could dance. With Kellie, well, they made it to this later point, so have really done well again (be it having survived two dance offs to get there).

I know this show is watched by lots of females, but not all females will just vote for a male (celeb or pro) that they fancy. Amongst my friends my girlfriends have like watching the female pros and female celebs as much as the male ones, and a girl may vote easily for a girl celeb that inspires her (from the dancing) as much as a man she likes watching dance because it's the gender she naturally gravites towards.
So the pull of a male pro can be great, but I still think it's perfectly sensible to assume they can't do it on their own. Has there ever been a female winner of this show were there was an obvious love for her pro but no love or appreciation for her. It seems unobvious to me that a succesful male pro has not been in some way aided by the appeal (of whatever kind) of that of their female celeb. Jill, Kara, Abbey, Alesha, Caroline, even Natasha, they seemed liked enough at the time for people to want them to win (alongside that of the will of their pro to win).

Anyway, I apologise for going on, and randomly picking out your post. It's not personal really to you, I just had general thoughts on what you said.
Miriam_R
11-12-2015
Originally Posted by lundavra:
“Could happen with Katie! Can't stand Anton but he does seem to appeal to some groups who are voting heavily for them.”

It def could, esp as this year seems to have that "this is his best opportunity to date with a half decent dancer" type of feeling with him and Katie.

With the likes of Judy, Nancy, Widdy it wouldn't really seem right to try and get Anton to a latter stage of the competition, but with Katie who is a contrast to those three, it seems to make more sense, not that there necessarily has to be sense in the type of person that makes it to the final if it's just seen as an entertaainment show.

Anton could be back to Widdy types after Katie, so I get this sense that it's an opportunity that some might feel needs to be grabbed.
lundavra
12-12-2015
Originally Posted by Miriam_R:
“It def could, esp as this year seems to have that "this is his best opportunity to date with a half decent dancer" type of feeling with him and Katie.

With the likes of Judy, Nancy, Widdy it wouldn't really seem right to try and get Anton to a latter stage of the competition, but with Katie who is a contrast to those three, it seems to make more sense, not that there necessarily has to be sense in the type of person that makes it to the final if it's just seen as an entertaainment show.

Anton could be back to Widdy types after Katie, so I get this sense that it's an opportunity that some might feel needs to be grabbed.”

The other factor is that there are many malicious people who would love to get enough to vote so the glitterball did not go to one of the better dancers. Katie is good but everyone knows she is not the best, probably including herself.
Bless You
12-12-2015
I enjoyed watching Abbey dance and I'm glad she won.
The_Bonobo
12-12-2015
Originally Posted by lundavra:
“The other factor is that there are many malicious people who would love to get enough to vote so the glitterball did not go to one of the better dancers. Katie is good but everyone knows she is not the best, probably including herself.”

Better dancer? Is that not a subjective opinion? Just like who you think is the better singer, or any art form?
I understand that ballroom has rules but there is a limit to the notion that someone is definitively the best (even more so on Strictly which is an entertainment show). If you feel it, if you are entertained by the dancing, that makes them "your" best dancer. There is no fact in it, just opinion. Not that Katie is my "best" but come on...
davegold
12-12-2015
Originally Posted by lundavra:
“The other factor is that there are many malicious people who would love to get enough to vote so the glitterball did not go to one of the better dancers. Katie is good but everyone knows she is not the best, probably including herself.”

You vote for the couple, not just the celeb. If you want the glitterball to go to the best ballroom couple you might choose Katie and Anton (or you might not).
Liza with a Zee
12-12-2015
Originally Posted by jfan:
“There has been a couple of negative threads involving Abbey Clancey winning and I don't get it.

I thought she was brilliant - not a 100% on this but didn't she come from a non dancing background?

The thing I liked the most was that she was always introduced as being Peter Crouch's partner but the table turned and now it's Peter's turn to be introduced as Abbey Clancey's (the lady who won Strictly) partner.

Personally I was delighted for her.”

I thought she was great too. She deserved to win. Didn't particularly like here u til she done her walking on sunshine QS. That won me over.
VicsMum
12-12-2015
Originally Posted by Miriam_R:
“Anyway, I apologise for going on, and randomly picking out your post. It's not personal really to you, I just had general thoughts on what you said.”

.

No worries, I understand and I think your points are very valid too.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map