Originally Posted by jinx2:
“Len and all the judges are having to give reasons as to why they choosing a couple to go through because when they didn't people were accusing them of "a fix.
Now Len is accused of "being rude" and the poor sod can't win.
Don't explain and you're a liar, do explain and you're meenie!
Len thought Katie and Anton danced better than Anita and Gleb and said so in an honest way that explained his decision in a 5 second sound bite. Maybe if he was given more time he could have given a point by point reason but by then half the viewers, myself included would have switched off the television set.
If you want to blame anyone, blame the people who enjoyed shouting fix (with a lot of noise from the newspapers). It is because of them the format had been forced to change and explanations demanded.”
I am not getting caught up in the fix thing. I was disappointed to see Anita go but am willing to accept the judges simply made their choices based on their honest feelings.
I don't really agree with the rest of your post, however. I just quickly watched Len's bit again. He didn't give any reason why he picked Katie. He said he was deciding based on the DO alone then that it was not close. He gave no specific reason at all. I am not saying he should be giving a detailed critique but watch it again and you will see he gives no actual reason. So it isn't really a case of "he can't win". Give a reason in a fair and sensitive way and it would have been fine.
I think the reason people are saying he was rude is because there was no need to say it wasn't even close. He could have just said he was picking Katie, with ideally at least a line or two why. He didn't need to add a line that came over like a snidey put down. He may not have meant it in a bad way but it came over that way. I think he possibly has a problem with Gleb (traditionalist blah blah) but maybe he could have been a bit more sensitive to Anita.