|
||||||||
Who would've won with the old format? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,283
|
Quote:
Lol
![]() nah, I just think she's been underrated this series. I do like her equally as much as Vana, but everyone seems to like Vana. LS didn't really see much of her abrasiveness, I don't think. He describes her as vivacious in the final five, and I think he really admired her enthusiasm. Vana's been overrated, I think. She was so bad in the first three weeks she was lucky not to get fired. ![]() But please tell me how bad Vana was in week 1 and week 2 (basically getting a "Joseph" in the final boardroom of week 2) ![]() And Monkey, the Gary PM win was not that great either. He got a very negative edit and was lucky that the other team was a mess (there is a reason that four out of the final five were on his team). |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
Sure, you love them equally
![]() But please tell me how bad Vana was in week 1 and week 2 (basically getting a "Joseph" in the final boardroom of week 2) ![]() And Monkey, the Gary PM win was not that great either. He got a very negative edit and was lucky that the other team was a mess (there is a reason that four out of the final five were on his team). I think it's just I find it unfair that Charleine excelled in the first three or four weeks and then flew under the radar, whilst Vana was pretty much the opposite, yet people seem to have forgotten how much of a contender Charleine was after the first few weeks and how poor Vana was. I do like them equally, I just feel compelled to support Charleine based on the unfair hate she's getting imo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
Quote:
Sure, you love them equally
![]() But please tell me how bad Vana was in week 1 and week 2 (basically getting a "Joseph" in the final boardroom of week 2) ![]() And Monkey, the Gary PM win was not that great either. He got a very negative edit and was lucky that the other team was a mess (there is a reason that four out of the final five were on his team). |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
|
Had it been the old format, Richard and Vana would have made then final with Richard probably winning in all honesty.
I also think Selina wouldn't have made it anywhere near as far, nor would Scott. Brett, David, Jenny and Ruth would all have probably lasted a bit longer than they did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 629
|
I think Richard would have won as he performed so well, and showed his talent as a marketer.
Nowadays, performance doesn't count as much, and the process is quite separate from the final five onwards. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 457
|
We won't know, because their cvs weren't scrutinised. That guy a few years ago Alex? Would never have won. Sugar obviously saw his buisiness plan beforehand
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,047
|
Vana will need to go to Dragons Den
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:45.




