DS Forums

 
 

Who would've won with the old format?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20-12-2015, 13:55
Sherlock_Holmes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,283
Lol
nah, I just think she's been underrated this series. I do like her equally as much as Vana, but everyone seems to like Vana.

LS didn't really see much of her abrasiveness, I don't think. He describes her as vivacious in the final five, and I think he really admired her enthusiasm.

Vana's been overrated, I think. She was so bad in the first three weeks she was lucky not to get fired.
Sure, you love them equally

But please tell me how bad Vana was in week 1 and week 2 (basically getting a "Joseph" in the final boardroom of week 2)

And Monkey, the Gary PM win was not that great either. He got a very negative edit and was lucky that the other team was a mess (there is a reason that four out of the final five were on his team).
Sherlock_Holmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 20-12-2015, 15:03
Alex_McNamee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 620
Sure, you love them equally

But please tell me how bad Vana was in week 1 and week 2 (basically getting a "Joseph" in the final boardroom of week 2)

And Monkey, the Gary PM win was not that great either. He got a very negative edit and was lucky that the other team was a mess (there is a reason that four out of the final five were on his team).
I do...
I think it's just I find it unfair that Charleine excelled in the first three or four weeks and then flew under the radar, whilst Vana was pretty much the opposite, yet people seem to have forgotten how much of a contender Charleine was after the first few weeks and how poor Vana was.
I do like them equally, I just feel compelled to support Charleine based on the unfair hate she's getting imo
Alex_McNamee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 22:53
Monkseal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
Sure, you love them equally

But please tell me how bad Vana was in week 1 and week 2 (basically getting a "Joseph" in the final boardroom of week 2)

And Monkey, the Gary PM win was not that great either. He got a very negative edit and was lucky that the other team was a mess (there is a reason that four out of the final five were on his team).
Yes, his win as PM got a negative edit on the main show. And then on "The Final Five" he got bigged up like he was the greatest PM of all time for the exact same task, with no criticism whatsoever. I thought it was an object lesson how they can portray the exact same set of events in two entirely different lights with very little effort.
Monkseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 23:05
ShotDownInFlame
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
Had it been the old format, Richard and Vana would have made then final with Richard probably winning in all honesty.

I also think Selina wouldn't have made it anywhere near as far, nor would Scott.

Brett, David, Jenny and Ruth would all have probably lasted a bit longer than they did.
ShotDownInFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 23:08
Squatch
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 629
I think Richard would have won as he performed so well, and showed his talent as a marketer.

Nowadays, performance doesn't count as much, and the process is quite separate from the final five onwards.
Squatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 00:19
Majik1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 457
We won't know, because their cvs weren't scrutinised. That guy a few years ago Alex? Would never have won. Sugar obviously saw his buisiness plan beforehand
Majik1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 04:17
SULLA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,047
Vana will need to go to Dragons Den
SULLA is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:45.